Remyelination therapy goes to trial for multiple sclerosis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

With a number of new drugs approved, the last decade has seen tremendous progress in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). All current drugs work by decreasing inflammation through modulation of the immune system, and while they have been very efficient in reducing the rate of relapses, their impact on the chronic disease course is unknown. A current thought in the MS therapeutics community is that drugs that enhance remyelination may be more effective in reducing long-term disability. This hypothesis is based on the observation that disability in MS increases with age as the capacity of oligodendrocytes to remyelinate decreases.1 Additional support for this hypothesis comes from extensive preclinical studies showing that promoting remyelination either by transplanting myelinating stem cells2,3 or by pharmacologic enhancement of endogenous myelination processes reduces clinical severity in animal models of MS.4,5 In this issue of Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, Tran et al.6 take this possibility to its exciting next step by reporting the results of the phase I clinical trial of the first drug aimed at promoting myelin repair.
The drug under study is a monoclonal antibody named BIIB033. Monoclonal antibodies are becoming very popular therapeutic agents due to their high affinity and specificity to their target, which results in safe and selective treatments. In addition, their advantageous patent protection compared to traditional drugs and their straightforward (although expensive) development process make these novel therapeutics much coveted by pharmaceutical companies. In the current article, the authors report that the drug under study is safe and the rate of adverse events low, which is the main goal of phase I trials. These timely results are important for physicians and patients considering enrolling in the already-ongoing phase II trial.
BIIB033 targets LINGO-1, a protein expressed in oligodendrocytes and neurons that has been shown to naturally inhibit oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination.7 This protein was also found to have increased expression in oligodendrocyte precursors from MS lesions.8 These discoveries led to the hypothesis that LINGO-1 inhibitors may enhance remyelination, which was later demonstrated using an anti-LINGO-1 antibody in several animal models of demyelination.9 LINGO-1 is a leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin domain-containing Nogo receptor-interacting protein shown to interact with EGFR, ErB2, NgR1, and TrkB receptors in the CNS.8 BIIB033 is thought to disrupt some or all of these interactions, leading to the activation of pathways critical for myelination (figure).
Cellular specificity of these interactions remains to be fully elucidated.
Most monoclonal antibodies, and BIIB033 is no exception, have low penetration into the CNS, which suggests that very high doses may be required to obtain a therapeutic effect. In this article, as well as in the ongoing phase II trial, doses up to 100 mg/kg were used. The researchers measured the concentration of BIIB033 in CSF and concluded that doses higher than 10 mg/kg may result in concentrations in the CNS equivalent to those shown to enhance remyelination in animal models of MS. Surprisingly, in this study, the concentration of BIIB033 in the CSF did not appear to correlate with the dose administered, which will need to be further clarified in future studies.
One of the drawbacks of antibody therapies is that patients may develop an immune response against the therapeutic molecule, rendering the drug no longer useful in those patients. In this article, they evaluated the rate of production of antibodies against BIIB033 and found it to be low. While this is encouraging, in this study the patients received only 1 or 2 doses of the drug, which is not representative of the therapeutic paradigm in the long-term. Unfortunately, they also found antibodies against BIIB033 in one placebo-treated individual (false-positive), which indicates that a better assay may be needed.
Perhaps the biggest challenge for bringing myelin repair therapies to the clinic is how to monitor efficacy. Although the goal of this phase I trial was simply to assess safety and tolerability, they did include several diagnostic endpoints to assess myelin integrity. The patients were subjected to conventional and nonconventional MRI. Not surprisingly, the authors found that conventional MRI, as well as fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and diffusion tensor imaging, were not very useful to detect changes in myelin. They also used magnetization transfer ratio, a novel MRI technique that aims to show myelin changes,10 which appeared promising. Nevertheless, accurate methods to assess remyelination are critical, and to date there are no fully validated tools to quantify this reparative process. Other ongoing research efforts to develop approaches to monitor changes in myelin include tracers for PET, which may provide the sensitivity and specificity required for this important task.
The phase II trial for BIIB033 will be carried out in combination with Avonex (interferon beta), which is one of the front-line anti-inflammatory MS drugs currently in use. This is an important consideration, since the newly formed myelin will need to be protected from the autoimmunity that resulted in the demyelination in the first place. It will be encouraging if this combinatorial approach provides benefit equivalent to the more potent, and risky, anti-inflammatories currently used when the front-line therapies fail to provide benefit.
We have now reached a potential turning point in MS therapeutics. Over the past decade considerable effort has been exerted to develop therapeutic strategies to enhance myelin repair. These attempts have been based largely on a significant body of data that has defined the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that drive oligodendrocyte maturation and the myelination process. The anti-LINGO-1 trial is likely the first of many that will test drugs that have been shown to enhance remyelination in murine models. Soon we should know whether this approach will provide benefit to patients with MS, which would be the first evidence that enhancing myelin repair may alter the course of this disease. Although the jury is still out on the phase II trial, the phase I verdict is promising.
STUDY FUNDING
No targeted funding reported.
DISCLOSURE
P. Brugarolas reports no disclosures. B. Popko serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association; is on the research committee of the Greater Illinois Chapter of NMSS; holds patents for animal models for demyelinating disorders, cell-based screen for agents useful for reducing demyelination, and methods for treating demyelination disorders; and has received support from NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NCATS, Target ALS/University of Pennsylvania, American Heart Association, Myelin Repair Foundation, and National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosures.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the editorial. The Article Processing Charge for this editorial was waived at the discretion of the Editor.
- © 2014 American Academy of Neurology
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
REFERENCES
- 1.↵
- Franklin RJ,
- Gallo V
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- Mei F,
- Fancy SP,
- Shen YA,
- et al
- 6.↵
- Tran JQ,
- Rana J,
- Barkhof F,
- et al
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MSM. Filippi, M. Bozzali, M.A. Horsfield et al.Neurology, January 11, 2000 -
Articles
A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MSC. Tortorella, B. Viti, M. Bozzali et al.Neurology, January 11, 2000 -
Articles
Early structural changes in acute MS lesions assessed by serial magnetization transfer studiesVincent Dousset, Annick Gayou, Bruno Brochet et al.Neurology, October 01, 1998 -
Views & Reviews
Imaging outcome measures of neuroprotection and repair in MSA consensus statement from NAIMSJiwon Oh, Daniel Ontaneda, Christina Azevedo et al.Neurology, February 20, 2019