Abstract
Objectives Adenosine deaminase 2 deficiency (DADA2) is a genetic, neurologic, and systemic vasculitis syndrome, which can lead to recurrent strokes, typically lacunar. In the cohort of now 60 patients followed up at the NIH Clinical Center (NIH CC), no patient has had a stroke since starting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockade. We present a family with multiple affected children to highlight the importance of TNF blockade not just as secondary stroke prevention but also as primary stroke prevention in genetically affected but clinically asymptomatic patients.
Methods A proband with recurrent cryptogenic strokes was referred for evaluation at the NIH CC. The parents and 3 clinically asymptomatic siblings were also evaluated.
Results The proband was diagnosed with DADA2 based on biochemical testing; her antiplatelet therapies were discontinued, and she was started on TNF blockade for secondary stroke prevention. Her 3 asymptomatic siblings were subsequently tested and 2 were found to be biochemically affected. One of them elected to start TNF blockade for primary stroke prevention and the other sibling declined this approach and experienced a stroke. A second genetic sequence variant was subsequently identified in the ADA2 gene.
Discussion This family illustrates the importance of testing for DADA2 in young patients with cryptogenic stroke, given the hemorrhagic risks with antiplatelet drugs in these patients and effectiveness of TNF blockade as secondary stroke prevention. In addition, this family highlights the importance of screening all siblings of affected patients because they may be presymptomatic, and we advocate starting TNF blockade for primary stroke prevention in those who are found to be genetically or biochemically affected.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Editor Josep O. Dalmau, MD, PhD, FAAN.
- Received June 17, 2022.
- Accepted in final form October 17, 2022.
- Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
