Abstract
Background and Objectives Antibodies (Abs) against the cytoplasmic protein glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) are detected in patients with neurologic syndromes together referred to as GAD65-Ab spectrum disorders. The response of some of these patients to plasma exchange or immunoglobulins indicates that GAD65-Abs could contribute to disease pathogenesis at least at some stages of disease. However, the involvement of GAD65-reactive B cells in the CNS is incompletely understood.
Methods We studied 7 patients with high levels of GAD65-Abs and generated monoclonal Abs (mAbs) derived from single cells in the CSF. Sequence characteristics, reactivity to GAD65, and the role of somatic hypermutations of the mAbs were analyzed.
Results Twelve CSF-derived mAbs were generated originating from 3 patients with short disease duration, and 7/12 of these mAbs (58%) were GAD65 reactive in at least 1 detection assay. Four of 12 (33%) were definitely positive in all 3 detection assays. The intrathecal anti-GAD65 response was polyclonal. GAD65-Abs were mostly of the IgG1 subtype and had undergone affinity maturation. Reversion of 2 GAD65-reactive mAbs to their corresponding germline-encoded unmutated common ancestors abolished GAD65 reactivity.
Discussion GAD65-specific B cells are present in the CNS and represent a sizable fraction of CSF B cells early in the disease course. The anti-GAD65 response in the CSF is polyclonal and shows evidence of antigen-driven affinity maturation required for GAD65 recognition. Our data support the hypothesis that the accumulation of GAD65-specific B cells and plasma cells in the CSF is an important feature of early disease stages.
Glossary
- Ab=
- antibody;
- AI=
- Ab index;
- CA=
- cerebellar ataxia;
- GABA=
- γ-aminobutyric acid;
- GAD=
- glutamic acid decarboxylase;
- GAD65-Ab SD=
- GAD65 antibody spectrum disorder;
- Ig=
- immunoglobulin;
- LE=
- limbic encephalitis;
- LGI1=
- leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1;
- mAb=
- monoclonal antibody;
- NNO=
- neuritis nervi optici;
- OCB=
- oligoclonal band;
- SHM=
- somatic hypermutation;
- SPS=
- stiff-person syndrome;
- TLE=
- temporal lobe epilepsy;
- UCA=
- unmutated common ancestor
The cytoplasmic protein glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of the major inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA).1 High serum levels of antibodies (Abs) against the isoform GAD65 have been associated with neurologic syndromes like stiff-person syndrome (SPS), cerebellar ataxia (CA), limbic encephalitis (LE), and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE)2,-,6 together referred to as GAD65 antibody spectrum disorders (GAD65-Ab SDs) and circulating GAD-reactive B cells in peripheral blood are abundant in these patients.7 However, low levels of GAD65-Abs are also detectable in around 1%–8% of patients with diverse neurologic disorders and healthy controls.8,-,10 This finding complicates the evaluation of serum GAD65-Abs in patients presenting with neurologic symptoms and questions the relevance of these peripheral GAD65-Abs in disease pathogenesis. Currently, the detection of GAD65-Abs in CSF in SPS and an intrathecal production of GAD65-Abs in CA and TLE are therefore proposed as diagnostic criteria for GAD65-Ab–associated neurologic disorders,11 highlighting the relevance of an intrathecal anti-GAD65 response in these disorders. Still, the intrathecal B-cell repertoire and the abundance of GAD65-specific B cells in the CNS are largely unknown. A more refined understanding of the immune response in these patients would however be of dire need, as an effective treatment in patients with GAD65-Ab SD remains challenging. We previously found that immune therapy including B-cell depletion with rituximab did not result in an improvement of outcome in patients with long-standing disease.12 In contrast, prompt initiation of treatment was associated with good outcome in a cohort of patients with GAD65-Ab–associated CA.13 Therefore, early initiation of immune therapy seems to be critical, and understanding the involved immune reactions is crucial to facilitate therapeutic decisions. We now sought to analyze autoimmunity to GAD65 in the CNS by generating a panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) derived from B cells in the CSF of 7 patients with GAD65-Ab SD. We could detect a sizeable fraction of GAD65-reactive B cells in the CNS in 3 patients at early stages of disease and provide evidence that GAD65-reactive B cells experienced antigen-driven affinity maturation. Overall, these findings support a role of CNS B-cell responses against GAD65 in early disease pathogenesis.
Methods
Study Approval
The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki after approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, and the University of Ulm. All patients or their legal representatives gave written informed consent before study enrollment.
Patients
We included 7 patients with GAD65-Ab SD, all of which exhibited high GAD65-Ab titers both in serum and CSF and evidence of intrathecal GAD65-Ab production. Patient recruitment and CSF sampling were performed between September 2017 and April 2022. Intrathecal GAD65-Ab synthesis was determined by calculating the Ab index (AI) using the following formula: (CSF GAD65-specific IgG) × (serum total IgG)/([CSF total IgG] × [serum GAD65-specific IgG]), with an AI above 1.4 indicating intrathecal synthesis.14 Clinical information and CSF characteristics are provided in Table 1. Fresh CSF was centrifuged at 300g for 15 minutes at 4°C. Cell pellets were either immediately used for single-cell sorting (patient no. 1) or directly frozen in 500 μL freezing medium (90% fetal calf serum and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide), stored at −80°C for 3 days at −196°C afterward, and used later for single-cell sorting (patient nos. 2–7). All CSF samples were processed within 20 minutes after lumbar puncture.
Characterization of the Study Cohort and CSF Samples
Generation of Monoclonal Abs
After pre-enrichment of B cells by negative selection with magnetic cell sorting using anti-CD3, anti-CD14, anti-CD56, the enriched B cells were stained with the following Abs: anti-CD3, anti-CD14, anti-CD56, anti-CD19, anti-CD27, anti-CD20, anti-CD24, anti-CD138, and anti-CD38. After single-cell sorting, reverse transcription-PCR was performed, followed by cDNA amplification and a nested PCR approach as described previously.15 PCR products were sequenced and cloned into the expression vector pTT5. Immunoglobulin (Ig) G subclasses were determined as described previously.16 Ig vector pairs were transiently transfected into HEK.EBNA cells, and Ab purification was performed by immobilized metal affinity chromatography as described previously.17 A detailed description of CSF single-cell isolation, Ig sequence analysis, and production of mAbs is provided in the supplementary material as eMethods, links.lww.com/NXI/A808.
Screening for GAD65 Reactivity
ELISA
GAD65-Abs were detected and quantified by human anti-GAD65 ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun).
Staining of Brain Tissue
In a tissue-based assay, primate cerebellar tissue (Euroimmun, FB 1111-1010-17) was used. Patient-derived mAbs (50 μg/mL), sera (1:100), and CSF supernatant (1:1) were analyzed for brain reactivity following the manufacturer's instructions. For detection, the goat anti-human IgG Alexa Fluor 488 Ab (Southern Biotech 2049-30; 5 μg/mL) was applied.
Cell-Based Assay
In addition, mAbs tested positive in the assays described above were tested by indirect immunofluorescence test in a cell-based assay on GAD65-transfected HEK293 cells and control transfected cells (Euroimmun, FA 1022-1005-50). MAbs were used at a concentration of 50 μg/mL and in a first step diluted 1:10 followed by dilutions of 1:100/1:400/1:1,600/1:6,400/1:25,600 if positive, and applied undiluted if negative.
Generation of Germline Abs
To identify somatic hypermutations (SHMs) that arose throughout affinity maturation, we aligned the sequences of the heavy chains and light chains of our GAD65-reactive mAbs against the 2021-10-11 germline reference set with the international ImMunoGeneTics information system/HighV-Quest v.3.5.27. We selected 2 mAbs (5D1 and 7A2) and reverted the sequences in FR1, FR2, FR3, CDR1, CDR2, and flanking regions of CDR3 to the germ-line sequence by nucleotide synthesis (GeneArt, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and performed cloning into the pTT5 expression system as described above.
Statistics
Statistical significance was assessed with Prism Software (GraphPad) by unpaired or paired, nonparametric or parametric t test analysis, as appropriate. p Values of *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 were considered significant and designated accordingly. Kd values were calculated by nonlinear regression using Prism Software (GraphPad).
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. No deidentified patient data will be shared.
Results
Patient Cohort Characteristics and GAD65 Reactivity
We aimed to generate mAbs derived from CSF from patients with GAD65-Ab SD. We included 7 patients with GAD65-Abs and an associated neurologic disorder, 4 with LE, 2 patients with CA, and 1 patient with recurrent neuritis nervi optici (NNO). The patient with NNO (no. 5) is the daughter of a patient with high-titer GAD-Abs and an associated CA. The patient was tested negative for Abs against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and aquaporin-4. One patient received azathioprine at the time of sampling; the other patients were untreated. As described,18 autoimmune comorbidities were common. Specific oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in CSF were present in 3/7 patients (Table 1). All patients exhibited high GAD65-Ab levels both in serum and CSF detected by GAD65 ELISA (eFigure 1A, links.lww.com/NXI/A808) and tissue-based assay using primate cerebellar slices (eFigure 1, B and C, links.lww.com/NXI/A808) and showed evidence of an intrathecal GAD65-Ab production (Table 1).
GAD65-Ab–Producing B Cells Are Present in the CSF at Early Stages of the Disease
Next, we aimed to analyze GAD65 reactivity on a single-cell level. We performed single-cell sorting of CSF cells from all 7 patients and produced patient-derived mAbs (Figure 1A). The gating strategy to define B-cell subpopulations is illustrated in eFigure 2, links.lww.com/NXI/A808. We were able to generate 12 mAbs derived from CSF B cells from 3 patients (3 mAbs from patient 2, 5 mAbs from patient 4, 1 mAb from patient 6, and 3 mAbs from patient 7) (Table 2). The generated mAbs were screened for their binding capacity to GAD65 using ELISA. Hereby, we identified 4 mAbs with low affinity (5D1, 5D3, 7E8, and 7H8) and 2 mAbs with high affinity (7A2 and 7H1) to GAD65 in ELISA (Figure 1B, Table 2). We tested our mAbs in dilution series to determine their affinity and detected dissociation constant (Kd) values ranging from 3.9 pM to 2.4 μM (Figure 1, C and D). Five mAbs tested positive in a cell-based assay using GAD65-transfected HEK293 cells (Figure 2, A and B, Table 2). These 5 mAbs also showed a GAD65-specific staining pattern in tissue-based assay using primate cerebellar slices (Figure 2C, Table 2). Of interest, 2 mAbs (7E8 and 7H8) showed GAD65 reactivity in ELISA but were negative both in cell-based and tissue-based assays. On the contrary, another mAb (9C3) tested negative in ELISA but was positive both in cell-based and tissue-based assays. Together, 58% (7/12) of CSF-derived mAbs showed GAD65 reactivity when all detection assays were considered. Thirty-three percent (4/12) of CSF-derived mAbs showed GAD reactivity in all 3 applied detection assays (Table 2). GAD-reactive mAbs were derived from 3 patients (patients 2, 4, and 7) with short disease duration (2, 3, and 10 months). In patient 6 with a disease duration of 5 months, 1 non–GAD-reactive mAb could be generated. In patients 1, 3, and 5 with disease durations of 81, 122, and 172 months, respectively, we could not generate mAbs derived from CSF B cells.
(A) Overview of the technical workflow to generate CSF-derived mAbs (created with BioRender). (B–D) Patient-derived mAbs were tested for GAD65 reactivity in ELISA. The horizontal dashed line indicates 4× OD of the negative control. Data are shown as the mean of at least 3 independent experiments; error bars indicate the SEM. Kd values were calculated using nonlinear regression analysis. (B) MAbs were tested at a concentration of 40 μg/mL and undiluted (concentrations ranging from 0.35 to 5.29 mg/mL). (C and D) MAbs positive in the screening-ELISA and the mAb HK341 and the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-specific mAb 8.18C5 as controls were tested in different dilutions with high-affinity GAD65-reactive Abs presented in (C) and low-affinity GAD65-reactive Abs in (D). GAD = glutamic acid decarboxylase; Kd = dissociation constant; mAb = monoclonal antibody; na = nonapplicable; OD = optical density.
Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies
(A and B) Cell-based assay using HEK293 cells transfected with GAD65 or mock transfected was performed. MAbs were used at a concentration of 50 μg/mL and in a first step diluted 1:10 followed by dilutions of 1:100/1:400/1:1,600/1:6,400/1:25,600 if positive and applied undiluted if negative. (A) Representative pictures for mAb 7A2 are shown. (B) The highest dilutions for all mAbs that revealed a positive staining are depicted. (C) Tissue-based assay with indirect immunofluorescence on primate cerebellar slices was performed to detect anti–GAD65-specific staining patterns using the patient-derived mAbs (50 μg/mL). The mAb HK341 was used as a negative control. A condition with only secondary antibody was used as an additional negative control. #Marks mAbs that show a GAD65-specific staining pattern characterized by a leopard-like granular layer staining. GAD = glutamic acid decarboxylase; mAb = monoclonal antibody.
Detailed Characterization of mAbs Reveals a High Rate of SHMs in GAD65-Reactive mAbs
We analyzed the sequence characteristics of all generated mAbs. IgG subclass analysis revealed that all mAbs, except 7E8, belonged to the IgG1 subclass (Table 2). No clonal relationships were identified among the mAb sequences, indicating a polyclonal anti-GAD65 response (Table 2). The number of SHMs was determined in the V region of all Ab chains. Hereby, GAD65-specific mAbs revealed a high number of SHMs (immunoglobulin heavy chain V gene segment: mean: 19.0, standard error of the mean: 2.8; immunoglobulin kappa or lambda light chain V gene segment: mean: 10.7, SEM: 2.6), indicating that these mAbs had undergone affinity maturation (Table 2).
Affinity Maturation Is Required for GAD65 Recognition
To determine the role of affinity maturation for GAD65 reactivity, we reverted 2 monoclonal GAD65-reactive Abs (5D1 and 7A2) to their corresponding unmutated common ancestors (UCAs) (Figure 3A). Next, affinities to GAD65 of the patient-derived sequences and their UCA counterparts were compared by dilution series in GAD65 ELISA. Here, we found that reactivity to GAD65 was completely abolished for the UCA of mAb 7A2 (binding of mAb 5D1 UCA in ELISA could not be determined) (Figure 3B). In a cell-based assay using GAD65-transfected HEK293 cells, GAD65 reactivity was abolished for both UCAs (Figure 3C). Moreover, binding to primate brain tissue and pancreas islet cells was also abolished for both UCAs (Figure 3D).
(A) The differences of the amino acid (AA) sequences of heavy and light chains between the patient-derived sequences (PDS) and their corresponding UCAs are illustrated. The differing AAs are depicted in white letters and the AA positions in black numbers. (B) GAD65 reactivity of PDS of mAb 7A2 and the corresponding UCA were compared by GAD65 ELISA. MAb 5D1 is not included due to weak reactivity in ELISA with positivity only at high concentrations (>350 μg/mL); however, the corresponding UCA was not producible at such a high concentration. (C) Cell-based assay using HEK293 cells transfected with GAD65 was performed. MAbs representing PDS or UCAs were used at a concentration of 50 μg/mL and in a first step diluted 1:10 followed by dilutions of 1:100/1:400/1:1,600/1:6,400/1:25,600 if positive and applied undiluted if negative. The highest dilutions that revealed a positive staining are depicted. (D) Comparison of binding to primate cerebellar and pancreas tissue of patient-derived sequences (PDS) and unmutated common ancestors (UCAs). For the mAbs 5D1 and 7A2, binding of the PDS and UCAs to primate cerebellar tissue and pancreas tissue was compared by indirect immunofluorescence with concentrations of 50 μg/mL of the mAbs. Left panel: Binding to primate cerebellar tissue is illustrated. The dashed white lines confine the leopard-like staining pattern of the granular layer that is specific for GAD65-Abs. Right panel: Binding to primate pancreas islets is illustrated. Pancreas islet cells are marked with a dashed white circle. GAD65-specific staining pattern is marked with #. CDR = complementarity determining region; ctrl = control; FR = framework region; GAD = glutamic acid decarboxylase; HC = heavy chain; mAb = monoclonal antibody; neg = negative; pos = positive; κC = kappa light chain; λC = lambda light chain.
Discussion
Our study provides insights into the CSF GAD65-specific B-cell receptor repertoire in patients with GAD65-Ab SD. An intrathecal production of GAD65-Abs is currently considered an essential diagnostic criterion in GAD65-Ab SD at least in LE/TLE and CA.11 Furthermore, it was shown that GAD-specific OCBs are exclusively or predominantly present in the CSF compared with serum in patients with SPS, indicating that GAD-Abs are produced by B-cell clones within the CNS.19 However, direct proof of an intrathecal production of GAD65-specific Abs by CSF B cells was lacking so far. We were able to directly demonstrate that GAD65-Ab–producing cells are present in the CSF of patients with GAD65-Ab SD. We hereby provide evidence that GAD65-Abs can be produced by B cells within the CSF compartment resulting in a polyclonal anti-GAD65 response.
Our CSF-derived GAD65-specific mAbs showed comparable features to mAbs derived from patients with leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis20 and GABAA receptor encephalitis.21 Here, high proportions of Ab-secreting cells expressing LGI1-Abs or GABAAR-Abs and high numbers of SHMs were observed. In contrast, in patients with NMDAR encephalitis, conflicting results exist. Whereas 1 study reported the presence of clonally expanded plasma cells with hypermutated antigen receptors in the CSF of patients with NMDAR encephalitis,22 another group showed that CSF-derived NMDAR-reactive mAbs often lacked any mutation compared with the germline-sequence23,24 and only a small fraction of Ab-secreting cells within the CSF exhibited Abs against NMDAR.23,24 The high numbers of SHMs of our mAbs indicate that GAD65-Ab-producing B cells have undergone affinity maturation during germinal center reactions. Germinal centers constitute microenvironments that allow diversification of antigen-reactive B cells and Ab maturation via SHMs with the help of T follicular helper cells.25 Recently, the relevance of germinal center reactions in autoantibody-mediated diseases was studied in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, where a germinal center–based generation of aquaporin-4 Abs was shown by analyzing paired blood and deep cervical lymph node samples. Hereby, rituximab effectively eliminated the intranodal synthesis of aquaporin-4 Abs and aquaporin-4-reactive B cells, which might explain how rituximab can be clinically effective without concomitant reduction of serum autoantibody levels.26 In NMDAR encephalitis, tertiary lymphoid architectures in ovarian teratomas were suggested, and a production of NMDAR autoantibodies was detected from cultured teratoma explants and dissociated intratumoral B cells and from 3/7 cultures of cervical lymph nodes.27 Our data point to a relevance of germinal center reactions also in GAD65-Ab SD.
During B-cell development, 2 tolerance checkpoints with elimination of autoreactive B cells from the maturing B-cell repertoire exist. The central tolerance checkpoint affects immature B cells in the bone marrow, whereas the peripheral tolerance checkpoint relates to B cells at the transition from new immigrant to mature naive cells in the periphery.28 Defects in B-cell tolerance checkpoints have been identified as essential characteristics in the development of autoimmunity.29,-,34 We sought to determine the relevance of early defects in B-cell tolerance in the development of GAD65-Abs. To this aim, we reverted the sequence of 2 of our CSF-derived GAD65-reactive mAbs to their UCAs, thereby generating mAbs corresponding to the B-cell receptors expressed by naive B-cell precursors of these GAD65-Ab–producing cells. Hereby, GAD65 reactivity was abolished. SHMs, therefore, play an important role in the generation of GAD65 reactivity. Similarly, an essential role of SHMs in introducing autoantigen-specific reactivity has been described in other autoimmune disorders like for Abs against aquaporin-4,35 for Abs against desmoglein-3 in pemphigus vulgaris,36 and for Abs against double-stranded DNA or extractable nuclear antigen in systemic lupus erythematosus.37,38
In our patient cohort, we were only able to generate mAbs from patients with a short disease duration (2, 3, 5, and 10 months vs 81, 122, and 172 months). Most mAbs were isolated from plasmablasts and plasma cells. In 3 of the patients, we were able to isolate GAD-reactive mAbs derived from CSF B cells. Our patient cohort is small, and we cannot exclude that technical limitations account for our inability to generate mAbs in some patients. However, the fact that all patients who exhibited GAD-specific B cells in the CSF had a rather short disease duration supports the idea that B cell–mediated or Ab-mediated mechanisms—if relevant in disease pathogenesis—are more pronounced in early disease stages. Of note, the number of mAbs that we could retrieve per patient was lower compared with published data for LGI1 encephalitis20 and NMDAR encephalitis.23 This might be related to differences in the technical approach; however, it might also be related to a relatively small fraction of B cells within the CSF cells in GAD65-Ab SD even at early stages of disease. Previously, it was shown that in patients with long-standing GAD65-LE, numbers of activated CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells are increased in CSF and peripheral blood.39 On the contrary, numbers of B cells and plasma cells were not altered in the CSF and peripheral blood of patients with long-standing GAD65-Ab–associated LE.39 Recently, it was shown that patients with GAD65-associated TLE exhibit high numbers of plasma cells within the brain parenchyma in the first 6 years after symptom onset, albeit no signs of Ab-mediated tissue damage were found. In addition, dense infiltration of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells was observed. In contrast, with longer disease duration, the density of all lymphocytes decreased. As a conclusion, an early active inflammatory stage (≤6 years) with neuronal loss followed by an immunologically inactive or low-active stage was proposed.40 Fitting to these observations, it was shown that an early initiation of immune therapy and a subacute onset in GAD65-Ab–associated CA were associated with therapy response.13 Also, in line with these findings, we previously found no clinical response to rituximab treatment in long-lasting GAD65-associated neurologic disorders when the modified Rankin Scale is used as the outcome measure.12
Limitations of our study are the small patient number with heterogeneous clinical phenotypes, which is attributed to the rareness of GAD65-associated neurologic disorders, the requirement of direct processing of the CSF, and the elaborate procedure to generate the mAbs. Furthermore, no patients with SPS were included in our study. Therefore, our results cannot readily be translated to this patient subgroup.
Together, this study indicates that GAD65-specific B cells are generated during a normal immune reaction from B cells that are not specific for GAD65. Our data underline the importance of SHMs in introducing autoantigen-specific reactivity during an ongoing immune response. In part of the patients with a short disease duration, GAD65-specific B cells represent a remarkably high proportion of CSF B cells. The pathogenic relevance of these GAD65-specific B cells remains to be established.
Study Funding
This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy within the framework of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (EXC 2145 SyNergy–ID 390857198) and through SFB TRR 274, the Else-Kröner Fresenius Foundation, and the Gemeinnützige Hertie Stiftung.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Heike Rübsamen for excellent technical assistance and Naoto Kawakami and Anneli Peters for critical comments on the manuscript. Part of the flow cytometry analysis was supported by Dr. L. Richter, Core Facility Flow Cytometry, Biomedical Center, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich.
Appendix Authors
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Editor Josep O. Dalmau, MD, PhD, FAAN.
- Received August 2, 2022.
- Accepted in final form December 12, 2022.
- Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
