Varicella-zoster virus encephalitis mimicking toxoplasmosis relapse
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Case report.
A 37-year-old woman was admitted with seizures, confusion, and fever following weeks of apathy and self-neglect. HIV-1 infection and cerebral toxoplasmosis were diagnosed 4 months before, with good clinical and radiologic response to sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine after 1 month1 (figure, A). After discharge she had poor adherence to antitoxoplasmosis and antiretroviral drugs.
(A) Brain MRI at the time of cerebral toxoplasmosis diagnosis (a) and after 1 month of toxoplasmosis treatment (b). (B) Brain MRI at admission showing increase in lesion number and contrast uptake. (C) Brain MRI showing radiologic response to toxoplasmosis treatment. (D) Brain MRI after progressive clinical deterioration showing increase in lesion number and multiple new enhancing vessels in the perforator and peripheral distribution of middle cerebral artery territories. (E) Brain MRI after 2 months of foscarnet treatment. Despite significant clinical improvement, radiologic lesions persist.
At this admission, examination revealed slow verbal and motor responses, disorientation, and pyrexia (38°C). Hemoglobin was 5.9 g/dL, CD4 = 4 cells/μL (1%), and HIV viral load was 114.294 copies/mL. Serologies were reactive for Toxoplasma and negative for Cryptococcus, hepatitis B and C, and syphilis. Brain MRI revealed more gadolinium-enhancing lesions (figure, B). Toxoplasmosis treatment and truvada/darunavir/ritonavir were restarted, with clinical and radiologic improvement of enhancement pattern after 6 weeks (figure, C).
Two weeks later, clinical worsening ensued, with fluctuating consciousness, apathy, aphasia, and food and medication refusal. MRI showed significant increase in T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery lesion number and extension and multiple new hemorrhagic and enhancing lesions following arterial territories (figure, D). CSF analysis showed 8 white cells/mm3, protein 1,330 mg/dL, and positive varicella-zoster virus (VZV) DNA (negative cryptococcal antigen, HIV, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex virus, and adenovirus PCR, antineuronal antibodies). Acyclovir (10 mg/kg, tid) was added.
Deterioration continued, with no eye or verbal response to stimuli, food and medication refusal, and tetraparesis with hyperreflexia and bilateral extensor plantar response. EEG excluded status epilepticus. CSF showed 1,350 erythrocytes/mm3, protein 2,400 mg/dL, no lymphocytes, and lower VZV DNA copies.
VZV hemorrhagic encephalitis with vasculopathy was assumed, so foscarnet (60 mg/kg/day) and IV methylprednisolone (3 g over 3 days) were added. Rapid improvement ensued, with the patient being alert with spontaneous eye opening and directing gaze to stimuli after 2 days and showing intentional movements later. Throughout, her attention fluctuated and she refused to engage. Despite considerable clinical improvement, MRI performed 2 months later still demonstrated widespread cerebral lesions (figure, E).
Discussion.
Encephalitis etiology frequently remains unknown.2,3 In immunosuppressed patients, CNS infections are among the most common complications, but clinical, radiologic, and laboratory features are similar in CNS infections, neoplasms, and HIV encephalopathy. Concurrent CNS pathologies must be considered when patients do not respond to treatment or present with rebound worsening, after excluding treatment nonadherence, drug resistances, misdiagnosis, and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Toxoplasmosis-IRIS is rare, and new perivascular/vascular gadolinium-enhancing lesions extending through perforator territories of middle cerebral arteries with punctate hemorrhagic signal with restricted diffusion-weighted signal areas and CSF VZV DNA were more suggestive of VZV vasculopathy in the case reported.
VZV is estimated to cause 5%–8% of adult encephalitis cases.3 Clinical suspicion is essential, especially in immunocompromised patients. In HIV-infected patients, VZV encephalitis is less frequent than tuberculosis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, cryptococcosis, or primary CNS lymphoma. In addition, its presentation is usually subacute and unspecific (headache, fever, altered consciousness, seizures, and/or focal neurologic deficits)4 and the rash is absent.5 VZV encephalitis is catastrophic despite therapy, with an estimated 33% mortality in HIV-infected patients and frequent neurologic sequelae in survivors.
VZV causes a productive infection in arteries,5 with secondary inflammation inducing vascular remodeling causing stenosis/occlusion. Hemorrhage can result from necrotizing angiitis or media disruption with aneurysm formation.6 Therefore, VZV infection must be considered in cryptogenic stroke patients or CNS vasculitis.
Brain MRI usually shows multiple ischemic lesions typically involving the gray-white matter junction.4 Angiographic features include focal stenosis, often with poststenotic dilation.4,5 CSF is normal (40% of HIV-infected patients) or shows modest pleocytosis, erythrocytes, and/or increased proteins.4 VZV DNA in CSF has 98% specificity and 80% sensitivity in HIV-infected patients,7 with a correlation between the viral load and CNS disease severity. However, VZV DNA becomes undetectable after weeks.5 CSF anti-VZV immunoglobulin G (IgG) has greater diagnostic value, increasing as VZV DNA becomes undetectable.
Optimally, CSF/serum VZV IgG index is needed to confirm intrathecal antibody production. DNA or IgG virologic confirmation in CSF is required for VZV encephalitis diagnosis, and only a negative result in both can rule out this infection. VZV in CSF is not routinely or timely tested, and VZV encephalitis diagnosis may be frequently missed.
First-line treatment for VZV encephalitis is acyclovir (10–15 mg/kg, tid, 10–14 days).2,4 In severe cases, oral/IV steroids are an option for arterial inflammation,4 but long-term steroids are not recommended.1,4 If acyclovir resistance is suspected, foscarnet is advised.1
In our patient, timely histopathologic confirmation was impossible; however, VZV DNA in CSF and sustained improvement after foscarnet and steroids support our diagnosis.
Conclusions.
VZV encephalitis has an unspecific presentation and may explain a significant proportion of cases of encephalitis classified as undetermined. Clinical suspicion is essential and routine screening for VZV in CSF needs to be implemented.
Footnotes
Author contributions: Inês B. Marques contributed to data acquisition and drafted the manuscript. Stuart Flanagan contributed to data acquisition and revised the draft critically for important intellectual content. Heather Noble contributed to data acquisition and revised the draft critically for important intellectual content. Gavin Giovannoni revised the draft critically for important intellectual content. Monica Marta contributed to data acquisition, participated in the manuscript design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript.
Study funding: No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure: I.B. Marques received research support from Tecnifar. S. Flanagan received travel funding from BHIVA/MSD, is on the advisory board for the social media editor at STI Journal, and was an on-air media doctor for BBC. H. Noble reports no disclosures. G. Giovannoni is on the scientific advisory board for Biogen-Idec, Fiveprime, Genzyme, GW Pharma, Ironwood, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Synthon BV, Teva, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, and Canbex; has received honoraria from Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, GW Pharma, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Teva; is an editor for Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders; has consulted for Biogen-Idec, Fiveprime, Genzyme, GQ Pharma, Ironwood, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Synthon BV, Teva, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, and Canbex; is on the speakers' bureau for Novartis and Teva; and has received research support from Genzyme and Merck. M. Marta has received travel funding from Biogen-Idec and Abbott Laboratories and has received research support from Merck-Serono. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosures. The Article Processing Charge was paid by the authors.
- Received September 15, 2014.
- Accepted in final form January 8, 2015.
- © 2015 American Academy of Neurology
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
References
- 1.↵
- Masur H,
- Brooks JT,
- Benson CA,
- Holmes KK,
- Pau AK,
- Kaplan JE
- 2.↵
- Tunkel AR,
- Glaser CA,
- Bloch KC,
- et al
- 3.↵
- Granerod J,
- Ambrose HE,
- Davies NW,
- et al
- 4.↵
- Gilden D,
- Cohrs RJ,
- Mahalingam R,
- Nagel MA
- 5.↵
- Nagel MA,
- Cohrs RJ,
- Mahalingam R,
- et al
- 6.↵
- Nagel MA,
- Traktinskiy I,
- Azarkh Y,
- et al
- 7.↵
- Corral I,
- Quereda C,
- Antela A,
- et al
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Nicole Sur and Dr. Mausaminben Hathidara
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
The value of detecting anti-VZV IgG antibody in CSF to diagnose VZV vasculopathyM. A. Nagel, B. Forghani, R. Mahalingam et al.Neurology, February 07, 2007 -
Articles
The varicella zoster virus vasculopathiesClinical, CSF, imaging, and virologic featuresM. A. Nagel, R. J. Cohrs, R. Mahalingam et al.Neurology, March 10, 2008 -
Clinical and Ethical Challenges
The challenging patient with varicella-zoster virus diseaseMaria A. Nagel, Don Gilden et al.Neurology: Clinical Practice, April 15, 2013 -
Views & Reviews
VZV vasculopathy and postherpetic neuralgiaProgress and perspective on antiviral therapyDonald H. Gilden, Randall J. Cohrs, Ravi Mahalingam et al.Neurology, January 10, 2005