Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

Share

June 2015; 2 (3) ArticleOpen Access

Critical role for prokineticin 2 in CNS autoimmunity

Mhamad Abou-Hamdan, Massimo Costanza, Elena Fontana, Marco Di Dario, Silvia Musio, Cenzo Congiu, Valentina Onnis, Roberta Lattanzi, Marta Radaelli, Vittorio Martinelli, Severo Salvadori, Lucia Negri, Pietro Luigi Poliani, Cinthia Farina, Gianfranco Balboni, Lawrence Steinman, Rosetta Pedotti
First published April 9, 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000095
Mhamad Abou-Hamdan
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Massimo Costanza
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Fontana
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Di Dario
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Musio
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cenzo Congiu
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentina Onnis
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberta Lattanzi
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Radaelli
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vittorio Martinelli
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Severo Salvadori
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucia Negri
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pietro Luigi Poliani
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cinthia Farina
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gianfranco Balboni
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence Steinman
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosetta Pedotti
From the Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Disorder Unit (M.A.-H., M.C., S.M., R.P.), Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine (E.F., P.L.P.), Pathology Unit, University of Brescia, Italy; Institute of Experimental Neurology (M.D.D., M.R., V.M., C.F.), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (C.C., V.O., G.B.), Pharmaceutical, Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Sciences Unit, University of Cagliari, Italy; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Vittorio Erspamer (R.L., L.N.), Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (S.S.), University of Ferrara, Italy; and Department of Neurology (L.S., R.P.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Critical role for prokineticin 2 in CNS autoimmunity
Mhamad Abou-Hamdan, Massimo Costanza, Elena Fontana, Marco Di Dario, Silvia Musio, Cenzo Congiu, Valentina Onnis, Roberta Lattanzi, Marta Radaelli, Vittorio Martinelli, Severo Salvadori, Lucia Negri, Pietro Luigi Poliani, Cinthia Farina, Gianfranco Balboni, Lawrence Steinman, Rosetta Pedotti
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Jun 2015, 2 (3) e95; DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000095

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1040

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential role of prokineticin 2 (PK2), a bioactive peptide involved in multiple biological functions including immune modulation, in CNS autoimmune demyelinating disease.

Methods: We investigated the expression of PK2 in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS), and in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. We evaluated the biological effects of PK2 on expression of EAE and on development of T-cell response against myelin by blocking PK2 in vivo with PK2 receptor antagonists. We treated with PK2 immune cells activated against myelin antigen to explore the immune-modulating effects of this peptide in vitro.

Results: Pk2 messenger RNA was upregulated in spinal cord and lymph node cells (LNCs) of mice with EAE. PK2 protein was expressed in EAE inflammatory infiltrates and was increased in sera during EAE. In patients with relapsing-remitting MS, transcripts for PK2 were significantly increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared with healthy controls, and PK2 serum concentrations were significantly higher. A PK2 receptor antagonist prevented or attenuated established EAE in chronic and relapsing-remitting models, reduced CNS inflammation and demyelination, and decreased the production of interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-17A cytokines in LNCs while increasing IL-10. PK2 in vitro increased IFN-γ and IL-17A and reduced IL-10 in splenocytes activated against myelin antigen.

Conclusion: These data suggest that PK2 is a critical immune regulator in CNS autoimmune demyelination and may represent a new target for therapy.

GLOSSARY

DMSO=
dimethyl sulfoxide;
EAE=
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis;
G-CSF=
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor;
IFN=
interferon;
IL=
interleukin;
LNC=
lymph node cell;
MOG=
myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein;
mRNA=
messenger RNA;
MS=
multiple sclerosis;
PBMC=
peripheral blood mononuclear cells;
PBS=
phosphate-buffered saline;
PK2=
prokineticin 2;
PKR=
PK receptor;
PKR1=
PK receptor 1;
PKR2=
PK receptor 2;
PLP=
proteolipid protein;
qRT-PCR=
quantitative real-time PCR;
Th=
T helper cell;
TNF=
tumor necrosis factor

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease of the CNS characterized by demyelination and neurodegeneration. CD4+ T lymphocytes activated against myelin autoantigens secreting T helper cell (Th) 1 cytokines and interleukin (IL)-17 are regarded as critical for initiation and perpetuation of inflammation in MS and its animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).1,2 Although immune-modulating therapies can reduce relapse rate and time to disease progression, there are currently no definitive cures for MS.3 A better understanding of the pathobiology of this complex disease is crucial in order to develop better therapies.

Prokineticin 2 (PK2) is a bioactive peptide member of the prokineticin family, which comprises 2 small secreted proteins (8–12 kDa) highly conserved across species, namely prokineticin 1 (also known as endocrine gland vascular endothelial factor) and PK2 (also known as Bv8).4,5 PK2 regulates multiple biological functions including circadian rhythm,6 angiogenesis,7,8 neurogenesis of olfactory bulb,9 neuronal survival,10 reproduction,11 and inflammation.12,13 It activates 2 similar G protein–coupled receptors, PK receptor 1 (PKR1) and PK receptor 2 (PKR2).14 Many cells and tissues, including the CNS and the immune system, express PK2.10,15,16 PK2 and PKRs are expressed by bone marrow cells and circulating leukocytes.4,8,17,18 PK2 was shown to induce hematopoietic cell mobilization and differentiation.8,18 PK2 increases in inflamed tissues5,15,19 and promotes inflammation.5,12,13 Moreover, PK2 promotes a Th1 phenotype by increasing the secretion of IL-1β and IL-12 and reducing the secretion of IL-10 in mouse macrophages,13 and decreasing the production of IL-10 and IL-4 in mouse splenocytes.12

In this study, we investigated the potential role of PK2 in CNS autoimmunity.

METHODS

EAE induction and assessment.

Chronic EAE was induced in C57BL/6 mice with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35–55 peptide, as described.20 Relapsing-remitting EAE was induced in SJL/J mice, as described.21 All mice were female and 8–12 weeks old (Charles River Laboratories, Calco, Italy). Animals were assessed daily for clinical signs of EAE.21 During pharmacologic studies, experimenters were blinded to the treatment regimen.

Human samples.

Blood samples were obtained from 24 European adults who were diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS according to McDonald criteria22 (11 women and 13 men; mean age 34.7 ± 1.7 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale score 1.7 ± 1.4; disease duration 7.9 ± 6.9 years, range 19–51 years). Patients were clinically stable, had not started any immune-modulating therapy before blood collection, and did not have other acute or chronic inflammatory disorders. Sampling was performed at least 4 weeks after the last clinical attack or steroid treatment. Twenty-four individuals (12 women and 12 men; age 33.7 ± 2.1 years, range 23–57 years) who had no acute or chronic inflammatory diseases or autoimmune disorders were included as controls.

Study approval.

All procedures involving animals were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Neurological Institute Foundation Carlo Besta and by the Italian General Direction for Animal Health at the Ministry for Health. The study on human samples was approved by the Ethical Committee of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute. Patients and controls gave their written informed consent.

Treatments.

The triazinic derivatives PKR1-preferential antagonists PC723 and PC124 and the amphibian ortholog of PK2, Bv8,5,12,13 were used in the study. For in vivo use, PC7 and PC1 were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in a final volume of 100 μL. As a control, mice were treated with an equal volume of PBS 1% DMSO (vehicle). Bv8 was isolated from skin secretions of the frog Bombina variegata as previously described5 and purified to 98% as assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Immunohistochemistry studies.

For PK2 and PKR tissue detection, 5-μm spinal cord sections from snap frozen fresh tissues embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound were stained with rabbit anti-PK2 (1:200 dilution, Covalab, Villeurbanne, France) and rabbit anti-PKR1 and anti-PKR2 (1:200 dilution, Alomone, Jerusalem, Israel).25 As negative controls, we used preadsorption of primary antibodies with PK2 (Covalab, 1:2), PKR1, and PKR2 (Alomone, 1:10) peptides, following manufacturer's instructions. All antibodies were revealed with EnVision+ rabbit horseradish peroxidase labeled polymer system and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as a chromogen according to the manufacturer's protocol (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Statistical analysis.

Unless otherwise specified, results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (La Jolla, CA). For EAE scores, differences between groups were examined for statistical significance by the nonparametric analysis Mann–Whitney U test. In all other cases, 2-tailed unpaired Student t test was used to detect differences between independent groups. p Values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Information on RNA extraction and real-time PCR for PK2, PKR1, and PKR2; measurement of PK2 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on serum samples; pathologic studies, proliferation assay, and cytokine analysis by ELISA; in vitro treatment with PK2/Bv8; and additional details on PC7 and PC1 compounds can be found in the supplemental material at Neurology.org/nn.

RESULTS

PK2 expression increases in the CNS during chronic EAE.

We first evaluated whether the expression of PK2 was increased in the target organ, the CNS, during EAE. We used quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to investigate the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of Pk2 and its receptors in spinal cords of C57BL/6 mice with MOG35–55-induced chronic EAE and naive mice. Pk2 expression was significantly increased in spinal cords obtained from mice with EAE compared with naive control mice (figure 1A). Both Pkr1 and Pkr2 mRNA were expressed in spinal cords of naive mice, and their expression did not change significantly in mice with EAE compared with naive mice. We next wanted to verify whether PK2 expression was increased in the CNS of EAE mice at the protein level. We then performed immunohistochemistry studies using anti-PK2 antibody. As expected,10,25 in naive mice, PK2 was expressed in neurons of the olfactory bulb and spinal cord gray matter (figure 1B). In spinal cord white matter of naive mice, only a weak PK2 staining was detected on glial cells (figure 1C, upper left panel). In contrast, in spinal cord white matter of mice with EAE, staining revealed that PK2 was highly expressed within inflammatory infiltrates (figure 1C, upper middle panel). Staining for PKR1 and PKR2, which was absent in spinal cord white matter of naive mice, was detected in inflammatory infiltrates in mice with EAE (figure 1C, middle and lower panels). These results show that inflammatory EAE infiltrates in the CNS express both PK2 and the receptors for PK2.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 PK2 increases during EAE

(A) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis to determine relative messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of Pk2, Pkr1, and Pkr2 in spinal cords of C57BL/6 mice with chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) 14 days after immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein35–55 or naive mice (n = 5 mice per group). Data are expressed as percentage of the housekeeping gene Gapdh. Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal lines indicate means. **p < 0.01 by Student t test. (B) Prokineticin 2 (PK2) staining in olfactory bulb (upper panel) and spinal cord gray matter (middle panel) of naive mice. Preabsorption of anti-PK2 antibody with PK2 peptide inhibited PK2 staining in spinal cord gray matter neurons (control staining, lower panel). Scale bars = 50 μm. (C) Representative immunohistochemical staining of PK2, PK receptor 1 (PKR1), and PK receptor 2 (PKR2) as well as control stainings (preabsorption with PK2, PKR1, or PKR2 peptides, respectively) in spinal cord white matter of naive mice and in inflammatory infiltrates of EAE mice. Scale bars = 50 μm. (D, E) qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA expression levels of Pk2, Pkr1, and Pkr2 in lymph node cells pooled from naive mice (n = 14) or mice with chronic EAE at different time points (n = 4–5 for each time point) (priming, 7 days after immunization; onset, 9–11 days after immunization; acute, 16 days after immunization). Data are representative of 1 of 2 independent experiments that gave similar results, each including an equal number of mice, and are expressed as percentage of the housekeeping gene Gapdh (mean ± SD). (F) PK2 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) concentration measured by ELISA in sera collected from naive or chronic EAE mice at different time points, as described in D and E. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments that gave similar results, each including 4–5 mice per group, and are shown as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001 by Student t test vs naive mice. N.D. = not detectable.

PK2 increases in lymph node cells and sera of mice with EAE.

Lymph nodes are known to play a pivotal role in the development of EAE by acting as a site for priming of T cells targeting CNS self-antigens. We evaluated mRNA expression of Pk2 in lymph node cells (LNCs) of naive mice and mice with EAE. Transcripts for Pk2 were undetectable in LNCs of naive mice. However, Pk2 expression increased in LNCs during EAE (figure 1D). The receptors for PK2 were both expressed at the mRNA level in naive LNCs. While the expression of Pkr1 did not change in LNCs during EAE, Pkr2 expression was dramatically reduced (figure 1E).

PK2 is a secreted protein. Because Pk2 mRNA was increased in LNCs of mice with EAE, we measured PK2 protein in serum by ELISA. We observed a significant increase of PK2 in sera of mice with EAE compared with naive mice (about a 2-fold increase at EAE onset) (figure 1F). G-CSF is a major inducer of PK2 in vitro and in vivo in both mice and humans, and treatment with G-CSF increases PK2 in serum.8,18 We therefore measured G-CSF in sera of mice with EAE and found a significant increase of G-CSF during the disease compared with naive mice (figure 1F). In particular, G-CSF concentrations peaked during the priming phase of EAE (7 days after immunization) and remained elevated during disease. Thus, the increase of G-CSF preceded that of PK2.

PK2 is increased in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.

To determine whether these findings could be potentially relevant to the human disease, we also analyzed PK2 mRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with relapsing-remitting MS and healthy controls by qRT-PCR. To limit variations in the gene expression, all patients were clinically stable and none of them had started any immunomodulatory therapy before sampling. PK2 transcripts were significantly increased in PBMC of patients with relapsing-remitting MS compared with healthy controls (figure 2A). We next evaluated the serum concentrations of PK2 by ELISA and found that PK2 was significantly increased in sera of patients with relapsing-remitting MS compared with healthy controls (figure 2B).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2 PK2 is increased in patients with RRMS

(A) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis to determine relative PK2 messenger RNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and healthy controls (n = 24 per group). Data are expressed as percentage of the housekeeping gene ALG8. (B) PK2 concentrations measured by ELISA in sera collected from patients with RRMS and healthy controls (n = 24 per group). In both A and B, each dot represents an individual and horizontal lines indicate the means. *p < 0.05, ***p = 0.001 by Student t test.

PKR antagonist reduces disease severity and CNS pathology in chronic and relapsing-remitting EAE.

We next set out to investigate the potential role of PK2 in CNS demyelinating disease by pharmacologic interference with PK2 receptors. Among the 2 known receptors for PK2, it was suggested that PKR1 is more important with regard to the proinflammatory effects induced by PK2 on immune cells in mice.5,12,13 In EAE studies, we used the nonpeptidic triazinic compound PC7 (figure 3A), which is a small molecule that competes for the binding of PK2 to its receptors, preferentially PKR1, and inhibits the ability of PK2 to activate downstream pathways.23,24 PC7 has a half maximal inhibitory concentration of 56 ± 12 nM for PKR1 and 5,230 ± 700 nM for PKR2 (figure 3B). We treated mice with MOG35–55-induced chronic EAE with daily intraperitoneal injections of PC7 (0.5 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Treatment with PC7 started on the day of immunization (preventive treatment) significantly delayed the onset of EAE clinical signs and reduced the severity of the disease (figure 3C and table e-1). In line with the observed disease attenuation, histopathology of CNS tissue revealed reduced inflammation and demyelination in spinal cord of mice treated with PC7 compared with vehicle-treated control mice (figure 3D). Next, we evaluated whether PC7 could reduce neurologic signs in mice with established EAE (therapeutic treatment). Treatment with PC7 started at the onset of EAE inhibited disease progression and reduced the severity within 4 days of treatment start and continued to confer protection over the next 2 weeks of treatment (figure 3E and table e-1).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3 PKR antagonist PC7 reduces the severity of chronic EAE

(A) Chemical structure of the prokineticin receptor (PKR) antagonist PC7. (B) Affinity for PKR1 and PKR2 assayed on membrane preparations from Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with PKR1 or PKR2 (see e-Methods). (C) Treatment with PC7 given daily intraperitoneally ameliorated myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35–55-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) when started at the time of disease induction (n = 10 mice per group). Data are representative of 1 of 3 independent experiments that gave similar results. (D) Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and anti–myelin basic protein (MBP) staining of spinal cord sections from MOG35–55-immunized mice treated with PC7 or vehicle from the day of immunization visualizing immune cell infiltration and demyelination, respectively (arrows). For the analysis, mice were sacrificed 36 days after immunization. Scale bars = 200 μm. The graphs below represent comparative analysis of infiltrated and demyelinated area (% of total area). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal lines indicate the means. *p < 0.05 by Student t test. (E) Daily treatment with PC7 ameliorates EAE when started at the onset of clinical signs (n = 10 mice per group). Mice were scored and randomized at the onset of neurologic signs immediately before first treatment. In C and E, solid lines beneath each panel indicate PC7 treatment. Filled circles, PC7 (0.5 mg/kg); open circles, vehicle only. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. The clinical EAE traits for these experiments are reported in table e-1. *p < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney U test.

We next examined whether antagonizing PKRs with PC7 was effective in reducing disease severity in a different EAE model. In contrast to MOG35–55 peptide, which causes chronic EAE in C57BL/6 mice, proteolipid protein (PLP)139–151 peptide induces relapsing-remitting EAE in SJL/J mice.21 Treatment with PC7 started at the time of EAE induction significantly reduced disease severity and CNS inflammation and demyelination (figure 4, A and B and table e-1). Moreover, treatment with PC7 inhibited disease progression when started at the onset of neurologic signs (figure 4C and table e-1). To confirm the results obtained with PC7, we used another triazinic PKR1-preferential antagonist, PC1, previously used in vivo in rats to block PK2 and reduce hyperalgesia in a model of inflammatory pain.5,24 Treatment with PC1 started at the time of immunization with PLP139–151 resulted in reduced disease severity in the relapsing-remitting EAE model (figure 4D and table e-1).

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4 Prokineticin receptor antagonists PC7 and PC1 reduce the severity of relapsing-remitting EAE

(A) Treatment with PC7 given daily intraperitoneally ameliorated proteolipid protein (PLP)139-151-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) when started at the time of disease induction (n = 9 in PC7 group, n = 10 in vehicle group). (B) Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and anti–myelin basic protein (MBP) staining of spinal cord sections from PLP139-151-immunized mice treated with PC7 or vehicle from the day of immunization visualizing immune cell infiltration and demyelination, respectively (arrows). For the analysis, mice were sacrificed 32 days after immunization. Scale bars = 200 μm. The graphs on the right represent comparative analysis of infiltrated and demyelinated area (% of total area). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal lines indicate the means. *p < 0.05 by Student t test. (C) PC7 ameliorates EAE when given at the onset of clinical signs (n = 10 mice per group). Mice were scored and randomized at the onset of neurologic signs immediately before first treatment. (D) Treatment with PC1 given daily intraperitoneally ameliorated PLP139–151-induced EAE when started at the time of disease induction (n = 10 mice per group). In A, C, and D, solid lines beneath each panel indicate treatment with PC7 (A, C) or PC1 (D). Filled circles, PC7 (0.5 mg/kg); filled diamonds, PC1 (0.5 mg/kg); open circles, vehicle only. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are representative of 1 of 2–4 independent experiments that gave similar results. *p < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney U test. The EAE clinical traits for these experiments are reported in table e-1.

PKR antagonist modulates Th1 and Th17 responses in EAE.

We next evaluated whether the protective phenotype observed in EAE mice treated with the PKR antagonist PC7 could be explained by an alteration of T-cell activation and Th regulation. We isolated LNCs from vehicle-treated and PC7-treated EAE mice during the priming phase of EAE and examined the recall response to peptide stimulation in vitro. In mice with MOG35–55-induced EAE, LNCs from PC7-treated mice displayed significantly reduced proliferation in response to peptide stimulation compared with vehicle-treated mice (figure 5A). Moreover, in LNCs of PC7-treated mice, the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-17A, and, to a lesser extent, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was significantly reduced, whereas secretion of the suppressor cytokine IL-10 was significantly increased compared with vehicle-treated mice (figure 5A). Of interest, IL-6, known to promote Th17 polarization, was significantly increased in LNCs from PC7-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated controls. Similarly, in PLP139–151-induced relapsing-remitting EAE, we observed a reduction of immune cell proliferation and of IFN-γ and TNF production in antigen-stimulated LNCs of EAE mice treated with PC7 compared with those of vehicle-treated mice (figure 5B). However, in this model, PC7 treatment did not affect IL-17A production. As in the chronic model, IL-6 and IL-10 were increased in LNCs from PC7-treated SJL mice. These results demonstrate that antagonizing PKRs induced an important modulation of proinflammatory responses against CNS myelin in 2 murine models of EAE. This impairment could represent an important mechanism by which PC7 treatment reduced EAE severity.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5 Effects of prokineticin receptor antagonist and PK2/Bv8 on T-cell response against myelin antigens

Lymph node cell (LNC) recall responses from (A) C57BL/6 mice immunized with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35–55 or (B) SJL/J mice immunized with proteolipid protein (PLP)139-151 treated daily intraperitoneally with PC7 (0.5 mg/kg) or vehicle. Treatments were started at the time of disease induction and LNCs were isolated from draining lymph nodes 7–10 days after immunization (5 mice/group). Filled circles, PC7 (0.5 mg/kg); open circles, vehicle only. (C) Splenocytes isolated from MOG35–55-immunized C57BL/6 mice 7 days after immunization were treated in vitro with prokineticin 2 (PK2)/Bv8 (10−9 M) or with PC7 (10−7 M) followed by PK2/Bv8 (10−9 M) before restimulation with antigen (50 μg/mL) or medium alone. T-cell proliferation was assessed by [3H] thymidine incorporation in triplicated cultures. Cytokine production was tested by ELISA in supernatants of parallel cultures. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are representative of 1 of 2 consecutive independent experiments that gave similar results. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Student t test. EAE = experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; N.D. = not detectable; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.

PK2/Bv8 promotes Th1 and Th17 responses in vitro.

We next examined the effects of PK2 in vitro on splenocytes from mice immunized with MOG35–55. We used Bv8, the amphibian ortholog of PK2 (hereafter referred to as PK2/Bv8), a potent agonist of PKRs and widely used to study the effect of PKR activation in mammals.5,12,13 We isolated splenocytes from MOG35–55-induced EAE mice during the priming phase and examined the recall response in vitro. Treatment with PK2/Bv8 increased immune cell proliferation and secretion of IFN-γ and IL-17A and reduced the production of IL-10 (figure 5C). These effects were reversed by pretreatment of cells with PC7 antagonist.

DISCUSSION

The bioactive peptide PK2 has recently been shown to have immune-modulating properties and to promote inflammation. The potential role of this peptide in MS and autoimmune disorders has never been investigated. We present evidence that supports an important immune regulatory role for PK2 in CNS autoimmunity. EAE induction resulted in increased expression of PK2 in mouse spinal cord at both the mRNA level and the protein level in white matter inflammatory infiltrates. This finding is in agreement with different studies reporting an overexpression of PK2 in human and rodent inflamed tissues with different pathologic conditions.5,15,19 This EAE-associated increase of PK2 was not limited to the inflamed CNS but was also observed in peripheral immune cells. Indeed, in lymph nodes, Pk2 mRNA that was undetectable in naive mice was highly expressed during EAE. Moreover, PK2 increased in sera of mice with EAE. In parallel with these results, we showed that in patients with relapsing-remitting MS, PK2 mRNA expression was increased in PBMC and PK2 protein concentration was higher in sera than in healthy controls. Neutrophils and macrophages are the major sources of PK2 in the immune system.8,16 In MS and EAE, myeloid cells such as macrophages are a prominent constituent of CNS inflammatory infiltrates, and monocytes increase in the bloodstream right before EAE relapses.26 Thus, macrophages might be important sources of PK2 in EAE and MS. G-CSF is the main inducer of PK2 in myeloid cells.8,27 We showed that PK2 increases early in LNCs and in serum during EAE and that G-CSF serum levels peak rapidly during the priming phase. These results suggest that G-CSF could play a key role in promoting PK2 transcription and secretion during EAE. Of interest, in studies published more than a decade ago, G-CSF expression in MS lesions was found to be upregulated in acute lesions by gene microarray analysis (about 13-fold relative to chronic silent plaques).28 Furthermore, treatment with G-CSF induced flares in patients with MS29 and patients with neuromyelitis optica,30 another demyelinating disease of the CNS in which inflammatory lesions are rich in granulocytes. Of note, in EAE, unlike MS, treatment with G-CSF has been shown to reduce disease severity.28,31 However, similar paradoxical results between MS and EAE are also seen with anti-TNF, for example.3

The increased expression of PK2 that we observed in EAE and MS suggests that this molecule could play a role in neuroinflammation. In support of this hypothesis, we showed that blocking PK2 receptors with the PKR1-preferential antagonist PC7 inhibited proinflammatory T-cell responses and reduced neurologic signs and CNS damage in chronic and relapsing EAE. A second PKR1-preferential antagonist, PC1, also ameliorated EAE. PK2 has been shown to promote the production of proinflammatory cytokines from different immune cells and to modulate T-cell function by reducing anti-inflammatory cytokine production while promoting Th1 responses.4,5,12,13,16 The amelioration of EAE induced by PC7 and PC1 could be explained at least in part by an overall impairment of proinflammatory responses against CNS myelin in EAE mice treated with PC7. Indeed, treatment reduced the production of IFN-γ in LNCs and, in chronic EAE, the production of IL-17A, known to play a crucial role in EAE development and progression, while increasing production of the suppressor cytokine IL-10, which is protective in EAE. In line with these data, we showed that PK2/Bv8 in vitro increased Th1 and Th17 responses in splenocytes activated against myelin antigen and reduced IL-10, and these effects were blocked by pretreatment with PC7. It is interesting that PK2 has recently been shown to activate STAT3,32 which is required for Th17 generation and plays critical roles in the development of EAE and MS.33 In our study, PC7 treatment in vivo also resulted in an increase of IL-6 in LNCs of mice with EAE. This cytokine is usually considered detrimental in EAE, as it promotes Th17 responses.34 However, IL-6 can also limit inflammation35 and exert neuroprotective effects.36,37

Our experiments demonstrated that PC7 antagonist importantly modulates autoimmune response against myelin antigen in peripheral immune cells. PC7 might also have an effect on CNS immune cells, such as microglial cells, which express PKRs.15 However, whether or not PC7 can cross the blood-brain barrier and enter the CNS parenchyma during EAE still needs to be ascertained. Moreover, other mechanisms might account for the beneficial role of PC7 in EAE. In fact, other cells expressing prokineticin and PKRs aside from immune cells might be important targets of PC7 in EAE. For example, within the CNS, neurons and astrocytes also express PKRs.15 These cells also express PK2.15 Hypoxia, reactive oxygen species, and excitotoxic glutamate, known to play a crucial role in ischemic brain injury and to contribute to myelin and axonal damage in MS,38,39 increase Pk2 mRNA in primary cortical cultures.15 Intracerebral administration of exogenous PK2 increases injury and immune cell recruitment into the CNS in a rat model of ischemic injury, and PKR antagonist reduced ischemic damage.15 Moreover, recent work demonstrates that peripheral nerve damage induces a significant increase of PK2 immunoreactivity in sensitive neurons and activated astrocytes in mouse spinal cord.25 Although our results suggest that immune cells infiltrating the CNS, likely macrophages, are an important source of PK2 during EAE, we cannot rule out the possibility that neuronal cells might also be important sources of PK2 during the disease.

The efficacy of PC7 and PC1 in reducing EAE severity is consistent with an important role for PKR1 in EAE but does not exclude a possible role for PKR2 in the disease, as both antagonists are also able to block PKR2. Thus, the contribution of each PKR to the pathogenesis of EAE and MS requires further investigation. Moreover, identification of PK2-producing cells and of their targets expressing PKRs during EAE and MS seems to be very important in order to understand the contribution of each molecule to disease pathogenesis. Of note, given the involvement of PK2 and its receptors in many important physiologic processes, extreme caution should be exercised when proposing PKR antagonists as a possible treatment for EAE and MS, and potential collateral effects associated with the use of PKR antagonists should be carefully determined.

In conclusion, our results identify PK2 as an important mediator of CNS autoimmunity and provide the basis for further investigation of the role of PK2 in MS and, potentially, for therapeutic application of PKR inhibitors in this disease.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

M.A.-H. performed the main experimental work, designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. M.C. designed, conducted, and analyzed gene expression studies in mice and performed some EAE experiments. E.F. and P.L.P. performed and evaluated pathologic and immunohistochemical studies. M.D.D. performed RT-PCR on human samples and helped with the PK2 ELISA study in human sera. S.M. conducted some EAE experiments. C.C. and V.O. synthesized PC1 and PC7. R.L. performed PC7 inhibition assays on transfected CHO cells. M.R. and V.M. provided human samples. S.S. conceived and contributed to the synthesis of PKR antagonist. L.N. provided PK2/Bv8, gave advice for Bv8 and PC7 use, and revised the manuscript. C.F. coordinated the experiments with human samples and revised and commented on the manuscript. G.B. made substantial contributions to project conception, synthesized PKR antagonists, and revised and commented on the manuscript. L.S. discussed results, gave feedback, and helped write the manuscript. R.P. conceived and supervised the work and wrote the paper.

STUDY FUNDING

This work was supported by grants from Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla FISM (FISM 2012/R/13 and FISM 2011/R/29 to R.P.) and Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2009-1607206 to R.P. and C.F.).

DISCLOSURE

M. Abou-Hamdan, M. Costanza, E. Fontana, M. Di Dario, S. Musio, C. Congiu, V. Onnis, R. Lattanzi, and M. Radaelli report no disclosures. V. Martinelli has served on the scientific advisory boards for Merck Serono and Genzyme and received travel funding and speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Bayer, Teva Pharma, Novartis, and Genzyme. S. Salvadori, L. Negri, and P.L. Poliani report no disclosures. C. Farina is on the editorial board for Advances in Medicine and received research support from Merck Serono and Italian Ministry for Health Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. G. Balboni reports no disclosures. L. Steinman has received travel funding and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Bayhill, Bayer, and Cellgene; has a patent pending for cytokines and type 1 interferons; is on the speakers' bureau for EMD Serono; and received research support from JT Pharma, Pfizer, Biogen, and NIH. R. Pedotti has received research support from Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla FISM. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Michelle Cheng for discussion and feedback on this work and Renato Longhi for synthesizing the encephalitogenic peptides.

Footnotes

  • Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was paid by Neurological Institute Foundation IRCCS Carlo Besta.

  • Supplemental data at Neurology.org/nn

  • Received December 1, 2014.
  • Accepted in final form February 2, 2015.
  • © 2015 American Academy of Neurology

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Goverman J
    . Autoimmune T cell responses in the central nervous system. Nat Rev Immunol 2009;9:393–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Steinman L
    . Immunology of relapse and remission in multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol 2014;32:257–281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Steinman L,
    2. Merrill JT,
    3. McInnes IB,
    4. Peakman M
    . Optimization of current and future therapy for autoimmune diseases. Nat Med 2012;18:59–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. LeCouter J,
    2. Zlot C,
    3. Tejada M,
    4. Peale F,
    5. Ferrara N
    . Bv8 and endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor stimulate hematopoiesis and hematopoietic cell mobilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:16813–16818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Giannini E,
    2. Lattanzi R,
    3. Nicotra A,
    4. et al
    . The chemokine Bv8/prokineticin 2 is up-regulated in inflammatory granulocytes and modulates inflammatory pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:14646–14651.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cheng MY,
    2. Bullock CM,
    3. Li C,
    4. et al
    . Prokineticin 2 transmits the behavioural circadian rhythm of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nature 2002;417:405–410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. LeCouter J,
    2. Kowalski J,
    3. Foster J,
    4. et al
    . Identification of an angiogenic mitogen selective for endocrine gland endothelium. Nature 2001;412:877–884.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shojaei F,
    2. Wu X,
    3. Zhong C,
    4. et al
    . Bv8 regulates myeloid-cell-dependent tumour angiogenesis. Nature 2007;450:825–831.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ng KL,
    2. Li JD,
    3. Cheng MY,
    4. Leslie FM,
    5. Lee AG,
    6. Zhou QY
    . Dependence of olfactory bulb neurogenesis on prokineticin 2 signaling. Science 2005;308:1923–1927.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Melchiorri D,
    2. Bruno V,
    3. Besong G,
    4. et al
    . The mammalian homologue of the novel peptide Bv8 is expressed in the central nervous system and supports neuronal survival by activating the MAP kinase/PI-3-kinase pathways. Eur J Neurosci 2001;13:1694–1702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pitteloud N,
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Pignatelli D,
    4. et al
    . Loss-of-function mutation in the prokineticin 2 gene causes Kallmann syndrome and normosmic idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:17447–17452.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Franchi S,
    2. Giannini E,
    3. Lattuada D,
    4. et al
    . The prokineticin receptor agonist Bv8 decreases IL-10 and IL-4 production in mice splenocytes by activating prokineticin receptor-1. BMC Immunol 2008;9:60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Martucci C,
    2. Franchi S,
    3. Giannini E,
    4. et al
    . Bv8, the amphibian homologue of the mammalian prokineticins, induces a proinflammatory phenotype of mouse macrophages. Br J Pharmacol 2006;147:225–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Negri L,
    2. Lattanzi R
    . Bv8/PK2 and prokineticin receptors: a druggable pronociceptive system. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2011;12:62–66.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cheng MY,
    2. Lee AG,
    3. Culbertson C,
    4. et al
    . Prokineticin 2 is an endangering mediator of cerebral ischemic injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:5475–5480.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Monnier J,
    2. Samson M
    . Cytokine properties of prokineticins. FEBS J 2008;275:4014–4021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dorsch M,
    2. Qiu Y,
    3. Soler D,
    4. et al
    . PK1/EG-VEGF induces monocyte differentiation and activation. J Leukoc Biol 2005;78:426–434.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zhong C,
    2. Qu X,
    3. Tan M,
    4. Meng YG,
    5. Ferrara N
    . Characterization and regulation of bv8 in human blood cells. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:2675–2684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Watson RP,
    2. Lilley E,
    3. Panesar M,
    4. et al
    . Increased prokineticin 2 expression in gut inflammation: role in visceral pain and intestinal ion transport. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;24:65–75, e12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Costanza M,
    2. Musio S,
    3. Abou-Hamdan M,
    4. Binart N,
    5. Pedotti R
    . Prolactin is not required for the development of severe chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 2013;191:2082–2088.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Pedotti R,
    2. Mitchell D,
    3. Wedemeyer J,
    4. et al
    . An unexpected version of horror autotoxicus: anaphylactic shock to a self-peptide. Nat Immunol 2001;2:216–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Polman CH,
    2. Reingold SC,
    3. Edan G,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 2005;58:840–846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Congiu C,
    2. Onnis V,
    3. Deplano A,
    4. et al
    . A new convenient synthetic method and preliminary pharmacological characterization of triazinediones as prokineticin receptor antagonists. Eur J Med Chem 2014;81:334–340.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Balboni G,
    2. Lazzari I,
    3. Trapella C,
    4. et al
    . Triazine compounds as antagonists at Bv8-prokineticin receptors. J Med Chem 2008;51:7635–7639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Maftei D,
    2. Marconi V,
    3. Florenzano F,
    4. et al
    . Controlling the activation of the Bv8/prokineticin system reduces neuroinflammation and abolishes thermal and tactile hyperalgesia in neuropathic animals. Br J Pharmacol 2014;171:4850–4865.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. King IL,
    2. Dickendesher TL,
    3. Segal BM
    . Circulating Ly-6C+ myeloid precursors migrate to the CNS and play a pathogenic role during autoimmune demyelinating disease. Blood 2009;113:3190–3197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Qu X,
    2. Zhuang G,
    3. Yu L,
    4. Meng G,
    5. Ferrara N
    . Induction of Bv8 expression by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in CD11b+Gr1+ cells: key role of Stat3 signaling. J Biol Chem 2012;287:19574–19584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lock C,
    2. Hermans G,
    3. Pedotti R,
    4. et al
    . Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat Med 2002;8:500–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Openshaw H,
    2. Stuve O,
    3. Antel JP,
    4. et al
    . Multiple sclerosis flares associated with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Neurology 2000;54:2147–2150.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Jacob A,
    2. Saadoun S,
    3. Kitley J,
    4. et al
    . Detrimental role of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in neuromyelitis optica: clinical case and histological evidence. Mult Scler 2012;18:1801–1803.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Zavala F,
    2. Abad S,
    3. Ezine S,
    4. Taupin V,
    5. Masson A,
    6. Bach JF
    . G-CSF therapy of ongoing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis via chemokine- and cytokine-based immune deviation. J Immunol 2002;168:2011–2019.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Xin H,
    2. Lu R,
    3. Lee H,
    4. et al
    . G-protein-coupled receptor agonist BV8/prokineticin-2 and STAT3 protein form a feed-forward loop in both normal and malignant myeloid cells. J Biol Chem 2013;288:13842–13849.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Egwuagu CE
    . STAT3 in CD4+ T helper cell differentiation and inflammatory diseases. Cytokine 2009;47:149–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Bettelli E,
    2. Carrier Y,
    3. Gao W,
    4. et al
    . Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature 2006;441:235–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mauer J,
    2. Chaurasia B,
    3. Goldau J,
    4. et al
    . Signaling by IL-6 promotes alternative activation of macrophages to limit endotoxemia and obesity-associated resistance to insulin. Nat Immunol 2014;15:423–430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Fang XX,
    2. Jiang XL,
    3. Han XH,
    4. Peng YP,
    5. Qiu YH
    . Neuroprotection of interleukin-6 against NMDA-induced neurotoxicity is mediated by JAK/STAT3, MAPK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2013;33:241–251.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Jung JE,
    2. Kim GS,
    3. Chan PH
    . Neuroprotection by interleukin-6 is mediated by signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and antioxidative signaling in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:3574–3579.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Kostic M,
    2. Zivkovic N,
    3. Stojanovic I
    . Multiple sclerosis and glutamate excitotoxicity. Rev Neurosci 2013;24:71–88.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Lassmann H,
    2. van Horssen J,
    3. Mahad D
    . Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurol 2012;8:647–656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • GLOSSARY
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • STUDY FUNDING
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Mitochondrial Disease Diagnosis

Dr. Robert Pitceathly and Dr. William Macken

► Watch

Topics Discussed

  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Autoimmune diseases

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Article
    Treatment with anti-FcεRIα antibody exacerbates EAE and T-cell immunity against myelin
    Silvia Musio, Massimo Costanza, Pietro Luigi Poliani et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, April 14, 2017
  • Article
    Immunodominant T-cell epitopes of MOG reside in its transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains in EAE
    Aparna Shetty, Sheena G. Gupta, Michel Varrin-Doyer et al.
    Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation, August 14, 2014
  • Article
    CSF SERPINA3 Levels Are Elevated in Patients With Progressive MS
    Nicolás Fissolo, Clara Matute-Blanch, Mohamoud Osman et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, January 12, 2021
  • Article
    Treatment of spontaneous EAE by laquinimod reduces Tfh, B cell aggregates, and disease progression
    Michel Varrin-Doyer, Kara L. Pekarek, Collin M. Spencer et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, September 21, 2016
Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation: 10 (3)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Online ISSN: 2332-7812

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise