Antiepileptic drug therapy in patients with autoimmune epilepsy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: We aimed to report the pattern of usage and efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with autoimmune epilepsy (AE).
Methods: We retrospectively studied the Mayo Clinic's electronic medical record of patients with AE in which seizures were the main presenting feature. Clinical data, including demographics, seizure characteristics, type of AED and immunotherapy used, presence of neural antibody, and treatment outcomes, were reviewed.
Results: The medical records of 252 adult patients diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic disorders were reviewed. Seizure was the initial presentation in 50 patients (20%). Serum and/or CSF autoantibodies were detected in 41 (82%) patients, and 38 (76%) patients had neural autoantibodies. The majority (n = 43, 86%) received at least 1 form of immunotherapy in combination with AEDs, while the remainder received AEDs alone. Twenty-seven patients (54%) became seizure free: 18 (36%) with immunotherapy, 5 (10%) with AEDs alone, and 4 (8%) with AEDs after immunotherapy failure. Levetiracetam was the most commonly used (42/50); however, it was associated with 0% seizure-free response. AED seizure-free responses occurred with carbamazepine (n = 3) [3/16, 18.8%], lacosamide (n = 3) [3/18, 16.6%] with phenytoin (n = 1) [1/8, 12.5%], or oxcarbazepine (n = 2) [2/11, 18.1%]. Regardless of the type of therapy, voltage-gated potassium channel-complex antibody–positive patients were more likely to become seizure free compared with glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 antibody–positive cases (12/17 vs 2/10, p = 0.0183).
Conclusions: In select patients, AEDs alone were effective in controlling seizures. AEDs with sodium channel blocking properties resulted in seizure freedom in a few cases. Prospective studies are needed to clarify AED selection and to elucidate their immunomodulatory properties in AE.
GLOSSARY
- AE=
- autoimmune epilepsy;
- AED=
- antiepileptic drug;
- EMR=
- electronic medical record;
- G-AChR=
- ganglionic acetylcholine receptor;
- NMDAR=
- NMDA receptor;
- TNFα=
- tumor necrosis factor–alpha;
- TPO=
- thyroid peroxidase;
- VGKC-complex=
- voltage-gated potassium channel–complex
Autoimmune epilepsy (AE) has been linked to both antineural antibodies targeting neural intracellular proteins (GAD65, ANNA-1, Ma, etc) and cell surface antigens (voltage-gated potassium channel–complex [VGKC-complex], NMDA receptor, AMPA, GABA-B, mGluR5, etc). AE can occasionally occur in the absence of detected neural antibodies as well.1 Valuable clinical clues for AE are subacute onset, an unusually high seizure frequency, intraindividual seizure variability or multifocality, antiepileptic drug (AEDs) resistance, personal or family history of autoimmunity, or history of recent or past neoplasia.2 Seizures occur as an early and prominent feature in AE, and these are characteristically refractory to conventional AED therapy.1
Although intractability is a common feature in AE, some respond to AEDs, and they remain an important aspect of therapy. The role of AEDs in these patients is also relevant as even after controlling the inflammatory response, some patients remain at risk of recurrent seizures, particularly if cerebral damage occurred during the acute encephalitic phase of the illness. Some AEDs affect cellular and humoral immune responses.3,–,6 For example, carbamazepine and valproate have been shown to increase the serum levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor–alpha (TNFα) production.4,5 At this time, no single AED stands out as superior to others in AE, and the medically refractory nature of seizures in these patients is typically emphasized. However, occasional patients do respond to AED treatment, and it is not currently known if this occurs with medications featuring particular mechanisms of action. In this study, we aimed to explore the pattern of usage and relative efficacy of AEDs in patients with AE.
METHODS
To identify all relevant adult cases of AE, we searched the medical record index system of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, for the terms “autoimmune encephalitis,” “autoimmune epilepsy,” “autoimmune seizure,” and “limbic encephalitis” from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015. Our search resulted in 252 cases. Among these, 50 patients were identified who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) seizures as the exclusive or predominant presenting complaint and (2) an autoimmune etiology suspected on the basis of clinical presentation, inflammatory CSF, MRI characteristics suggesting inflammation, or detection of serum and/or CSF neural autoantibody7 (figure 1). Demographic, clinical (seizure semiology, course, and associated symptoms), autoimmune serology, type of AED and immunotherapy used, EEG and radiologic characteristics, and treatment outcomes were reviewed.
AANA-1 = antineuronal nuclear antibody–1; AED = antiepileptic drug; EMR = electronic medical record; G-ACR = ganglionic acetylcholine receptor; GAD65 = glutamic acid decarboxylase 65; NMDAR = NMDA receptor; SSA = Sjögren's-syndrome-related antigen A; TPO = thyroid peroxidase; VGCC = voltage-gated calcium channel; VGKC-complex = voltage-gated potassium channel–complex.
Baseline seizure frequency was determined by reviewing the seizure frequency stated in the clinical record prior to initiation of treatment and categorized as daily (>1 seizure per day), weekly (>1 seizure per week but not daily), or monthly (>1 seizure per month but not weekly). Response to AED with and without immunotherapy was determined by review of the record documenting course following treatment initiation.
Statistical analysis.
Data were expressed as mean, range, and SD for continuous variables, and counts (percentages) for categorical variables. We compared treatment response by antibody type (VGKC-complex antibodies vs GAD65 vs antibody negative) using the Fisher exact test. All analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.3). All statistical tests were 2 sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.
The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, and all patients consented to the use of their medical records for research purposes.
RESULTS
Clinical characteristics.
Patients age ranged from 10 to 87 years (mean age 41.3 years); 26 (52%) were men. The mean age at onset was 41 years. The median follow-up period was 18 months (range 3–44 months). Seizure types were focal seizures with and without loss of awareness, faciobrachial dystonic seizures, epilepsy partialis continua, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures with/without status. EEG was abnormal with interictal discharges or documented seizure activity in the majority of cases. MRI data were abnormal in 23 patients. Brain PET CT was performed in 4 patients, and it was abnormal in each. Summary of clinical characteristics of the 50 patients is provided in table 1.
Summary of clinical characteristics of 50 patients with suspected AE
Autoantibody evaluation.
Neural autoantibodies were identified in 38 patients (76%), of which 26 had antibodies targeting plasma membrane proteins: VGKC-complex antibody (n = 17) (LGI1 [11], CASPR2 [1], and double negative [5]); ganglionic acetylcholine receptor (G-AChR) (n = 5); NMDA receptor (n = 3); P/Q-type calcium channel (n = 1), and 12 had antibodies targeting cytoplasmic or nuclear proteins: P GAD65 (n = 10), ANNA-1 (n = 1), and ANNA-2 (n = 1). Three patients (6%) had non-neuronal antibodies (thyroid peroxidase [TPO], Ant-Ro, and anti–dsDNA), and nine patients (18%) were autoantibody negative.
Treatments and response.
The majority (n = 43, 86%) received at least 1 form of immunotherapy in combination with AEDs, while the reminder received AEDs alone. The median number of AEDs used was 2 (range 1–6). Levetiracetam was the most common medication used (n = 42), followed by lacosamide (n = 18), carbamazepine (n = 16), oxcarbazepine (n = 11), lamotrigine (n = 11), and phenytoin (n = 8). Summary of AED use for the cohort is provided in figure 2. In addition, 4 patients received vagus nerve stimulation therapy, and 3 patients had unsuccessful epilepsy surgeries. The rationale for selecting one AED over the other was not clarified in the electronic medical record (EMR). Twenty-seven patients (54%) became seizure free: 18 (36%) with immunotherapy, 5 (10%) with AEDs alone, and 4 (8%) with AEDs after failing immunotherapy. Initiation of carbamazepine (n = 3) (3/16, 18.8%), lacosamide (n = 3) (3/18, 16.6%), phenytoin (n = 1) (1/8, 12.5%), or oxcarbazepine (n = 2) (2/11, 18.1%) resulted in seizure-free outcomes, while none of the patients became seizure free with levetiracetam (n = 0) (0/42, 0%). The timing of therapeutic response to AEDs (i.e., cessation of clinical seizures) was immediate: within 24 hours in 1 patient, within 1 week in 2, within 2 weeks in 3, and within 4 weeks in the remainder.
AE = autoimmune epilepsy; AED = antiepileptic drug.
Among those who responded to AED therapy, 4 were VGKC-complex antibody positive (1 LGI1, 1 CASPR2, and 2 double negative), 1 was GAD65 antibody positive, 1 was AChR antibody positive, 1 was TPO antibody positive, and 2 were autoantibody negative. Regardless of the type of therapy, VGKC-complex antibody–positive patients were more likely to become seizure free compared with GAD65-positive and autoimmune antibody–negative cases (12/17 vs 2/10 vs 2/9 respectively, p < 0.05). Specifically, of the VGKC-complex antibody patients who became seizure free, 4 responded to AEDs (25%), while the remainder became seizure free with immunotherapy (75%). One patient with GAD65 ab-associated AE responded to carbamazepine, while the other became seizure free with immunotherapy. Two of the autoantibody-negative cases responded to AEDs (carbamazepine), and 2 became seizure free with immunotherapy. Details of patients who responded to AEDs alone or after failure of immunotherapy are summarized in table 2 and figure 3.
Clinical characteristics of patients who become seizure free with AED therapy
The number of patients who responded per the total number of patients receiving individual therapy is provided in each bar. Ab negative = negative to antibody testing (n = 9); AED = antiepileptic drug; GAD65 = glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (n = 10); VGKC-complex = voltage-gated potassium channel–complex (n = 17).
DISCUSSION
Although the seizures in AE are often considered to be medication resistant, and immunotherapy is often the focus of management,7 this study suggests that in select cases AEDs alone may confer seizure freedom.
Of interest in our study, 9 patients became seizure free after the initiation of AEDs with sodium channel blocking properties7 (carbamazepine, n = 3; oxcarbazepine, n = 2; lacosamide alone, n = 3, or with phenytoin, n = 1). The response to AEDs was seen within 2–4 weeks of the initiation of therapy in all patients. In a few patients, AEDs alone were effective in controlling seizures. However, improvement of cognitive symptoms and other manifestations of autoimmune encephalitis in most patients requires immunotherapy.7 It is conceivable that these therapeutic responses could be secondary to immunomodulatory properties of these medications.4,–,6 For example, carbamazepine has been shown to reduce levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα in the hippocampus of rats4 and inhibits the development of different types of inflammation through dose-dependent reduction of prostaglandin E2 and substance P.5 Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine have also been shown to decrease serum levels of IL-1 and IL-2 in healthy subjects.5 Although disruption of blood-brain barrier permeability has been suggested as a possible pathway for cytokines influencing seizures and epilepsy,8 the exact role of cytokines in human epilepsy is complex and not yet completely elucidated. Moreover, whether there are unique aspects of the pathophysiology of seizure onset in these patients which make them more susceptible to sodium channel blockage is not known. The observed response could also be due to the effectiveness of sodium channel blockers in focal onset epilepsy which is seen in 66% of patients in our cohort. Of note, while AED responders responded to sodium channel blockers, no patient responded to lamotrigine, which also has sodium channel properties.9 Therefore, if there is a unique responsivity of seizures in these patients to this class of medications, the response may not be uniform throughout the entire class. Studies are needed to elucidate whether any differential efficacy is based on their effect on seizure mechanisms or immunomodulatory properties.
Regardless of the type of therapy, VGKC-complex antibody–positive patients were more likely to become seizure free compared with GAD65-positive and autoimmune antibody–negative cases (figure 2). This is consistent with previous observations of superior immunotherapy response in patients with neural surface–related autoantibody-mediated encephalitides as compared to those associated with intracellular antigen autoantibodies.1,7,10 Of note, among the patients who responded to AEDs in our cohort, the majority were VGKC-complex antibody positive (1 LGI1 positive; 1 CASPR2 positive, and 2 double negative). Two of these responded to oxcarbazepine, one to lacosamide, and the other to carbamazepine (figure 1). Indeed, sodium-channel blocking agents such as carbamazepine and phenytoin have been successfully used to treat autoimmune VGK channelopathies such as neuromyotonia11 and episodic ataxia type 1.12 These agents act by reducing neuronal repetitive firing through interaction with voltage-gated sodium channels.11,12 Perhaps, the observed favorable response of these agents in VGKC-complex ab–associated AE is attributable to this mechanism. In our series, one patient with GAD65 ab–associated AE became seizure free with carbamazepine after failing immunotherapy. This is in contrast to a similar report that found lack of AED response in patients with GAD65 antibody–positive AE following which it was postulated that GAD65 ab–associated AEs are intractable to AEDs.13 Regardless of the type of therapy, 4/9 (44.4%) autoantibody-negative patients become seizure free, 2 with AEDs (one with lacosamide and the other with carbamazepine after failing immunotherapy), while the other two responded to immunotherapy. Others have noted the potential for response in patients with seronegative AE to antiepileptic medication and immunotherapy.14
The rationale for selecting one AED over the other was not clarified in the EMR of our cohort. Levetiracetam was the most common used drug (42/50, figure 2); however, none of the patients in our series were rendered seizure free by this medication (0%). This finding is in contrast to previous reports suggesting that levetiracetam may have, at least in part, anti-inflammatory properties.3 The reason for the prevalent use of levetiracetam in our series is likely due to its ease of dosing and lack of drug-drug interactions.9 Certainly, AEDs with enzyme induction properties such as carbamazepine and phenytoin could alter the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive therapies and other agents used in these patients.9 Perhaps, newer AEDs with sodium channel blocking properties and more favorable pharmacokinetic profiles (such as oxcarbazepine and lacosamide) could be considered in this patient population. It is also imperative to monitor for hyponatremia (e.g., oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine) and allergic cutaneous reactions (e.g., carbamazepine and phenytoin), as these have been shown to occur at high rate in patients with VGKC-complex antibody.15 Prospective studies are needed to clarify AED selection and to elucidate their immunomodulatory properties in AE.
There are several limitations to our study. First, data collection for this retrospective study was based on the extraction of relevant patient information from EMRs. The lack of control group and the possible confounder of concomitant immunotherapy should also be acknowledged. In addition, selection bias could be present due to the tertiary nature of these patients. Finally, seizure quantification is only based on verbal report, thus recall bias could result in the event of amnestic seizures, and related to concurrent cognitive dysfunction that may have been present in a significant proportion of our cohort. Prospective studies are needed to clarify whether there is an optimal AED selection for AE. As the awareness of AE increases, finding effective strategies for seizure control is crucial.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Study concept and design: Dr. Feyissa and Dr. Britton. Acquisition of data: Dr. Feyissa, Dr. Lopez, and Dr. Britton. Drafting of the manuscript: Dr. Feyissa and Dr. Lopez. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Dr. Feyissa and Dr. Britton.
STUDY FUNDING
Dr. Feyissa is supported by the Mayo Clinic Neuroscience Focused Research Team Program.
DISCLOSURE
Dr. Feyissa and Dr. Lopez report no disclosures. Dr. Briton received research support from Grifols and Dr. and Mrs. David Hawk. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was funded by the Mayo Clinic.
- Received February 7, 2017.
- Accepted in final form March 28, 2017.
- Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
REFERENCES
- 1.↵
- Britton JW
- 2.↵
- Bakpa OD,
- Reuber M,
- Irani SR
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- Himmerich H,
- Bartsch S,
- Hamer H, et al
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- French JA,
- Gazzola DM
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- von Rhein B,
- Wagner J,
- Widman G,
- Malter MP,
- Elger CE,
- Helmstaedter C
- 15.↵
- Irani SR,
- Stagg CJ,
- Schott JM, et al
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Evaluation of seizure treatment in anti-LGI1, anti-NMDAR, and anti-GABABR encephalitisMarienke A.A.M. de Bruijn, Agnes van Sonderen, Marleen H. van Coevorden-Hameete et al.Neurology, April 12, 2019 -
Article
Utility of an immunotherapy trial in evaluating patients with presumed autoimmune epilepsyM. Toledano, J.W. Britton, A. McKeon et al.Neurology, April 04, 2014 -
Article
Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizuresViktor Farkas, Barbara Steinborn, J. Robert Flamini et al.Neurology, August 28, 2019 -
Special Article
Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: Treatment-resistant epilepsyReport of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy SocietyAndres M. Kanner, Eric Ashman, David Gloss et al.Neurology, June 13, 2018