Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

Share

July 2017; 4 (4) ArticleOpen Access

Dynamic regulation of serum aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists in MS

Veit Rothhammer, Davis M. Borucki, Maria Isabel Garcia Sanchez, Maria Antonietta Mazzola, Christopher C. Hemond, Keren Regev, Anu Paul, Pia Kivisäkk, Rohit Bakshi, Guillermo Izquierdo, Howard L. Weiner, Francisco J. Quintana
First published June 16, 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000359
Veit Rothhammer
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Davis M. Borucki
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Isabel Garcia Sanchez
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Antonietta Mazzola
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher C. Hemond
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keren Regev
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anu Paul
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pia Kivisäkk
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rohit Bakshi
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillermo Izquierdo
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Howard L. Weiner
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francisco J. Quintana
From the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases (V.R., D.M.B., M.A.M., C.C.H., K.R., A.P., P.K., R.B., H.L.W., F.J.Q.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Molecular Biology Service and MS Unit (M.I.G.S., G.I.), University of Seville, Spain; and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (F.J.Q.), Cambridge, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Dynamic regulation of serum aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists in MS
Veit Rothhammer, Davis M. Borucki, Maria Isabel Garcia Sanchez, Maria Antonietta Mazzola, Christopher C. Hemond, Keren Regev, Anu Paul, Pia Kivisäkk, Rohit Bakshi, Guillermo Izquierdo, Howard L. Weiner, Francisco J. Quintana
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Jul 2017, 4 (4) e359; DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000359

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1400

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: Several factors influence the clinical course of autoimmune inflammatory diseases such as MS and inflammatory bowel disease. Only recently, the complex interaction between the gut microbiome, dietary factors, and metabolism has started to be appreciated with regard to its potential to modulate acute and chronic inflammation. One of the molecular sensors that mediates the effects of these environmental signals on the immune response is the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a ligand-activated transcription factor with key functions in immune cells.

Methods: In this study, we analyzed the levels of AHR agonists in serum samples from patients with MS and healthy controls in a case-control study.

Results: We detected a global decrease of circulating AHR agonists in relapsing-remitting MS patients as compared to controls. However, during acute CNS inflammation in clinically isolated syndrome or active MS, we measured increased AHR agonistic activity. Moreover, AHR ligand levels in patients with benign MS with relatively mild clinical impairment despite longstanding disease were unaltered as compared to healthy controls.

Conclusions: Collectively, these data suggest that AHR agonists in serum are dynamically modulated during the course of MS. These findings may guide the development of biomarkers to monitor disease activity as well as the design of novel therapeutic interventions for MS.

GLOSSARY

AHR=
aryl hydrocarbon receptor;
CIS=
clinically isolated syndrome;
DMT=
disease-modifying therapy;
HEK=
human embryonic kidney;
IBD=
inflammatory bowel disease;
Kyn=
Kynurenine;
RRMS=
relapsing-remitting MS

The Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a key regulator of innate and adaptive immune responses relevant to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and MS.1,–,4 AHR is a ligand-activated transcription factor, whose function is regulated by small agonists that promote AHR activation, nuclear translocation, and the control of specific transcriptional programs.5,–,14 These agonists are provided by diverse sources, including environmental pollutants, dietary components, microbial products, as well as endogenous metabolites.3,6,–,11,13,–,17

The relevance of endogenous AHR ligands during inflammation has been investigated in different experimental paradigms. l-Kynurenine (Kyn), for example, is an AHR agonist generated by endogenous metabolism. Of interest, Kyn is increased in the context of inflammation and dampens proinflammatory T-cell responses, limiting immune-mediated pathology.18,19 Similarly, synthetic agonists can also activate AHR to therapeutically modulate the immune response. Laquinimod is an AHR agonist that shows anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in the MS model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis probably as a result of the inhibition of NF-κB activation in mouse and human dendritic cells.20,–,25 Indeed, beneficial effects of laquinimod were also documented in the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Avonex and Laquinimod (BRAVO) study, in which laquinimod-treated patients with MS showed a reduction in the rate of cerebral atrophy vs placebo that suggested a neuroprotective role of AHR activation during CNS inflammation.26

Anti-inflammatory AHR ligands are also provided by the diet and commensal bacteria.2,9 These ligands have the capability to dampen ongoing inflammation in the colonic mucosa and improve the outcome of experimental colitis.6 Moreover, alterations in the composition of the commensal flora as well as genetic polymorphisms detected in IBD patients have been shown to impair the generation of these protective AHR ligands, ultimately contributing to immune dysregulation and disease pathology.6

AHR agonists provided by the diet and commensal bacteria also contribute to the control of CNS inflammation. We have recently shown that AHR agonists generated by the interaction of the gut microbiome and host metabolism cross the blood-brain barrier and dampen CNS inflammation by activating AHR in resident cells.5 Accordingly, we detected decreased CNS AHR activation in a small set of MS samples, as well as decreased circulating AHR agonists.5,6

In this study, we analyzed AHR agonists in serum samples from patients with MS and healthy controls. We detected a decrease in serum AHR agonists in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients.5 However, during acute CNS inflammation in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or patients with RRMS, we detected increased AHR agonist levels as compared to healthy controls or clinically stable patients with RRMS. Serum AHR agonists in patients with benign MS with relatively mild clinical impairment despite longstanding disease, however, exhibited unaltered AHR ligand levels as compared to healthy controls. Collectively, these findings suggest that serum AHR agonists are dynamically modulated during the course of MS. Low basal levels of circulating AHR agonists are detected in patients with MS, probably reflecting deficits associated not only with the diet and commensal flora but also in the pathways that control the production and degradation of AHR agonists. Inflammation increases AHR agonists in serum, probably by promoting the production of endogenous anti-inflammatory metabolites such as Kyn. Finally, a fraction of patients with MS maintains control levels of circulating AHR agonists concomitant with a more benign disease course, suggesting a protective role of AHR ligands in later stages of MS in the absence of acute inflammation. These observations might guide the development of novel therapeutics for MS and biomarkers for risk stratification and treatment selection in patients with MS.

METHODS

Determination of AHR agonistic activity.

Fifteen thousand human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells per well were plated in 96-well plates (flat bottom). Twenty-four hours after plating, cells were transfected with equal amounts of pGud-Luc (Firefly luciferase under control of AHR-responsive promoter element27) and pTK-Renilla (Renilla luciferase under control of constitutively active thymidine kinase promoter; Promega, Madison, WI) using Fugene Transfection Reagent (Promega) as suggested by the manufacturer. After 24 hours, transfected cells were incubated with Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% of patient serum in duplicates. Luciferase activity was analyzed 24 hours later using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System (Promega). Firefly luciferase activity was divided by Renilla luciferase activity and normalized to their respective control levels, which were set as 100%.

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Brigham and Women's Hospital, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses were performed with Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA), using the statistical tests indicated in the individual figure legends. No samples were excluded. The investigators were blinded as to sample cohorts when performing AHR ligand level measurement and samples were run in duplicates. p Values of <0.05 were considered significant. All error bars represent SEM.

RESULTS

AHR agonistic activity in serum is decreased in stable RRMS.

To study circulating AHR agonistic activity in MS samples, we first analyzed sera from a cohort of patients with RRMS and compared these to sera from healthy controls (table). In these studies, we used a reporter assay based on HEK-293 cells cotransfected with a plasmid containing an AHR-responsive promoter element (xenobiotic response element) driving firefly luciferase expression (pGud-Luc27), and a thymidine kinase promoter-driven Renilla luciferase construct (pTK-Renilla) to control for transfection efficiency.5 Following transfection, the reporter cells were incubated with patient serum, and relative luciferase activities (pGud-Luc/pTK-Renilla) were determined after 24 hours using a commercial dual-luciferase assay. This assay detected AHR activation in response to a broad range of AHR agonists, including the pollutant 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the dietary ligand Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), ligands derived from microbial and host tryptophan metabolism such as Indole, Indoxyl-3-sulfate (I3S), Indirubin, and 2′Z-Indirubin, the mucosal ligand 2-(1′H-indole-3′-carbonyl)-thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl ester (ITE) and the endogenous metabolite Kyn (figure 1). Using this approach, we detected a global decrease in AHR agonistic activity in RRMS patient sera as compared to healthy controls (figure 2). Note that some patients displayed higher serum AHR agonistic activity than healthy controls, suggesting that additional disease-linked mechanisms may increase AHR agonits in patients with MS. However, patient age, disease duration, or the prevalence of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) were not associated with the detected AHR agonistic activity (figure e-1 at Neurology.org/nn).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table

Characteristics of patients with MS and controls tested in luciferase assays

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 Detection of aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands from different sources

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonistic activity was measured for a collection of AHR ligands from exogenous and exogenous sources, including the pollutant 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) (A), the diet-derived ligand Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) (B), ligands derived from microbial and host tryptophan metabolism Indole (C), Indoxyl-3-sulfate (I3S) (D), Indirubin (E), and 2′Z-Indirubin (F), the mucosal ligand 2-(1′H-indole-3′-carbonyl)-thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl ester (ITE) (G), and the endogenous metabolite Kynurenine (H). Data are normalized to 100% (maximum activity per ligand) and are representative of 2 independent experiments.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand levels are decreased in patients with relapsing-remitting MS

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonistic activity in serum samples of healthy controls (controls, n = 26) and relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients (RRMS, n = 91) was assessed in duplicates using an AHR ligand–sensitive luciferase assay. Relative activity was calculated by dividing firefly luciferase activity (pGud-Luc) by Renilla luciferase activity (pTK-Renilla). Values are means of duplicate measurements. Lines represent mean and error bars standard error of the mean (SEM). Significance levels were derived using the Student t test. **p < 0.01.

Circulating AHR agonists are increased during acute CNS inflammation.

AHR ligands are generated during acute inflammation by different mechanisms including the enzymatic activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) which produces anti-inflammatory Kyn.1,–,3 Thus, we speculated that acute CNS inflammation such as that linked to MS relapses might modulate AHR agonists in serum. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed an additional cohort of patients with MS with active CNS inflammation as determined by the presence of cerebral gadolinium-enhancing lesions in MRI at the time of sample acquisition and compared them to a group of patients with RRMS with nonactive disease (table). While we still detected a global decrease in AHR ligand levels in comparison to healthy controls, RRMS active patients displayed increased AHR serum levels as compared to the samples from the RRMS remission cohort (figure 3).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand levels are modulated by disease activity

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonistic activity in serum samples of healthy controls (controls, n = 26), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients during remission (RRMS remission, n = 32), and patients with RRMS with active disease (RRMS active, n = 20) was assessed in duplicates using an AHR ligand–sensitive luciferase assay. Values are means of duplicate measurements. Lines represent mean and error bars standard error of the mean (SEM). Significance levels were derived using 1-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey multiple comparisons test. ****p < 0.0001.

To further validate these findings, we used an independent cohort of patients who had been recently diagnosed with CIS, the first clinical manifestation of autoimmune CNS inflammation (table). CIS does not fulfill anamnestic or MRI tomographic criteria for MS and does not always convert into clinically definitive MS, the risk of which can be assessed by evaluating additional biomarkers, such as MRI, CSF composition, or electrophysiologic studies, among others.28,29

Sera from CIS patients displayed increased AHR agonistic activity as compared to healthy controls (figure 4). Together with our findings on patients with RRMS during a disease relapse, these findings suggest that acute CNS inflammation results in increased serum AHR agonist levels.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand levels are increased in clinically isolated syndrome as compared to healthy controls

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonistic activity in serum samples of healthy controls (controls, n = 33) and patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS, n = 15) was assessed in duplicates. Values are means of duplicate measurements. Lines represent mean and error bars standard error of the mean (SEM). Significance level was derived by the Student t test. **p < 0.01.

Unaffected AHR agonist levels in patients with benign MS.

Patients with benign MS present a relatively mild disease course, despite long disease duration and limited use of DMTs.30 Based on the anti-inflammatory effects of AHR in several experimental models of autoimmunity2,3,13 and potentially MS,21,22 we analyzed circulating AHR agonist levels in a cohort of patients with benign MS characterized by mild clinical impairment despite longstanding RRMS (“Benign MS,” table). We found that serum samples from patients with benign MS showed AHR agonist levels comparable to those detected in controls (figure 5).

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand levels in patients with benign relapsing-remitting MS are unchanged as compared to healthy controls

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonistic activity in serum samples of healthy controls (controls, n = 7) and patients with benign relapsing-remitting MS as defined by low EDSS scores despite longstanding disease (benign MS, n = 11) was assessed in duplicates. Values are means of duplicate measurements. Lines represent mean and error bars standard error of the mean (SEM). Significance level was derived by the Student t test. n.s. = not significant.

DISCUSSION

In this work, we analyzed serum levels of AHR agonists in patients with MS. Our data suggest that AHR agonist levels are dynamically modulated during the course of MS: in acute inflammation, such as the first relapse in CIS or during relapses in RRMS, AHR agonistic activity is increased as compared to controls or patients with RRMS with stable disease, respectively. By contrast, during stable disease, AHR ligand levels negatively correlate with disease severity, since patients with benign MS exhibit higher levels of AHR agonistic activity than patients with MS suffering from more severe disease (figure 6).

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6 Dynamic modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand levels in patients with relapsing-remitting MS

(A) Serum aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonistic activity is increased during the first relapse of the disease but decreases below control levels in remission. Further relapses increase AHR ligand levels during the relapse. (B) Benign courses of MS have control levels of AHR agonistic activity and might be increased during relapses. RRMS = relapsing-remitting MS.

Several factors might contribute to the decrease in circulating AHR agonists detected in patients with MS. It has become clear in recent years that genetic polymorphisms correlate with an increased risk of developing MS. While most of these polymorphisms have been linked to the immune system,31,–,34 metabolic pathways relevant to the uptake, activation, or degradation of AHR ligands are also affected, as indicated by reported alterations in enzymes that catalyze the generation of AHR ligands from dietary tryptophan.35,–,37 Moreover, genetically defined factors have the potential to influence the composition of the gut microbiome, for example, via the production of microRNAs or altered cytokine signaling.6,38,39 Finally, the genetic background of patients with MS may impair the uptake of microbiota-produced AHR agonists and their precursors, as well as their activation into potent AHR agonists. Collectively, these factors may influence AHR-dependent immunoregulation in MS.

Inflammation seems to increase circulating AHR agonists in MS. Inflammation has profound effects on metabolism. Indeed, it has been reported that the AHR agonist Kyn is produced by the metabolism during inflammation.18,19 Thus, together with additional AHR agonists that may be generated during inflammation, Kyn may participate in a negative feedback loop aimed at limiting immunopathology. This anti-inflammatory mechanism may cross-talk with additional immunoregulatory pathways40 and/or DMTs. Type I interferons, for example, modulate Kyn levels41 in patients with MS.

Several limitations and potential confounding factors have to be taken into consideration when assessing AHR agonist levels in human samples in our study. First, some of our cohorts were limited in patient numbers and exhibited imperfect matching of age, disease duration, or prevalence of DMT. Although we did not detect systematic changes when analyzing the correlation of these factors with agonistic activity (figure e-1), additional potentially unknown variables, such as preanalytical sample processing, storage conditions, or selective AHR ligand degradation or enrichment during sample preparation cannot be excluded. Also, cohort-specific differences, including dietary factors, changes in the gut flora, and potential effects of specific therapies, might constitute additional confounding factors. Indeed, some patients showed an increased activity of serum AHR ligands, the reasons for which are not clear as of now. Future longitudinal studies may be helpful in determining the clinical relevance of this observation. Moreover, our assay determines the net agonistic activity of AHR ligands in biological samples. Thus, relative changes in specific agonistic or inhibitory AHR ligand levels could be masked or missed by our approach. Finally, technical aspects need to be taken into consideration, since AHR ligand binding and activation has been shown to be species and cell line specific.42,–,45 Thus, the use of different cell lines or transfection techniques (e.g., stable vs transient transfection) may lead to varying results in individual assay systems.

Based on our observations, it is tempting to speculate that different sources of AHR agonists drive chronic and acute AHR activation in MS. Chronic AHR activation may be controlled by the genetic background, diet, and/or the commensal flora, with potential confounding effects provided by environmental factors such as sun exposure and daylight that may differentially influence specific cohorts of patients with MS and controls.31,46 Acute AHR activation may be controlled by AHR-activating metabolites, such as Kyn, produced in the context of inflammation to limit immunopathology. The integration of these multiple sources of AHR agonists determines the contribution of AHR signaling to immune modulation. Longitudinal studies based on metabolomic approaches are therefore needed to analyze the correlation between specific AHR agonists, their sources, and disease activity in MS and, potentially, other conditions such as IBD. More importantly, given the potential of AHR agonists to cross the blood-brain barrier and modulate CNS inflammation,5 AHR activation could represent a novel therapeutic avenue for MS.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Veit Rothhammer: AHR ligand measurement, data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript writing and revision. Davis M. Borucki: AHR ligand measurement, data analysis, and manuscript revision. Maria Antonietta Mazzola, Christopher C. Hemond, Anu Paul, Maria Isabel Garcia Sanchez, Guillermo Izquierdo, Keren Regev, Pia Kivisäkk, Rohit Bakshi, and Howard L. Weiner: providing of patient samples and clinical data. Francisco J. Quintana: design and supervision of the study, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing, revision, and editing.

STUDY FUNDING

This work was supported by grants ES025530, AI093903, and AI126880 from the NIH and RG4111A1 and JF2161-A-5 from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society to F.J.Q. V.R. received support from an educational grant from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (A219074) and by a fellowship from the German Research Foundation (DFG RO4866 1/1).

DISCLOSURE

V. Rothhammer, D.M. Borucki, M.I. Garcia Sanchez, and M.A. Mazzola report no disclosures. C.C. Hemond received research support from the American Academy of Neurology. K. Regev and A. Paul report no disclosures. P. Kivisakk received research support from EMD Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, and Verily Life Sciences. R. Bakshi is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Neuroimaging, consulted for EMD Serono, Genentech, Sanofi Genzyme, and Novartis, and received research support from Biogen, EMD Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme; Dr. Bakshi's spouse holds stock/stock options in Biogen Idec. G. Izquierdo served on the scientific advisory board for Biogen Idec, Bayer, Sanofi, Roche, Novartis, Genzyme, Almirall, Merck Serono, and Teva and consulted for Sanofi, Merck, and Novartis. H.L. Weiner served on the advisory board for The Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, Teva, Biogen Idec, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis, consulted for Therapix, Biogen, Novartis, Serono, Teva, and Sanofi, and received research support from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. F.J. Quintana served on the scientific advisory board for Reva, served on the editorial board for Systems Biomedicine, Inmunologia (Spain), American Journal of Clinical Experimental Immunology, Seminars in immunopathology, and associate editor for Immunology (UK), consulted for Teva, Blueprint Medicines, and AnTolRx, and received research support from EMD_Serono, Sanofi, Novartis, Teva, ONO, NIH, Harvard Medical School, BADERC, and NMSS. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors acknowledge the participants and the healthy controls in this study for their participation and to the Nodo Biobanco Hospitalario Virgen Macarena (Biobanco Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía) for its help and support in the gifts of clinical samples used in this work. The Biobank is integrated in the Spanish Biobanks Network (RetBioH; redbiobancos.es), and supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, integrated in the national I+D+i 2013–2016 and cofunded by the European Union (ERDF/ESF, “Investing in your future”) (grant no. PT13/0010/0041). They also thank Shahamat Tauhid and Sheena L. Dupuy for technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was funded by the NIH.

  • Supplemental data at Neurology.org/nn

  • Received February 1, 2017.
  • Accepted in final form March 23, 2017.
  • Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Stockinger B,
    2. Di Meglio P,
    3. Gialitakis M,
    4. Duarte JH
    . The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: multitasking in the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol 2014;32:403–432.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mascanfroni ID,
    2. Yeste A,
    3. Vieira SM, et al
    . IL-27 acts on DCs to suppress the T cell response and autoimmunity by inducing expression of the immunoregulatory molecule CD39. Nat Immunol 2013;14:1054–1063.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Quintana FJ
    . The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: a molecular pathway for the environmental control of the immune response. Immunology 2013;138:183–189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cella M,
    2. Colonna M
    . Aryl hydrocarbon receptor: linking environment to immunity. Semin Immunol 2015;27:310–314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rothhammer V,
    2. Mascanfroni ID,
    3. Bunse L, et al
    . Type I interferons and microbial metabolites of tryptophan modulate astrocyte activity and central nervous system inflammation via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nat Med 2016;22:586–597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lamas B,
    2. Richard ML,
    3. Leducq V, et al
    . CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Nat Med 2016;22:598–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mascanfroni ID,
    2. Takenaka MC,
    3. Yeste A, et al
    . Metabolic control of type 1 regulatory T cell differentiation by AHR and HIF1-alpha. Nat Med 2015;21:638–646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Fukumoto S,
    2. Toshimitsu T,
    3. Matsuoka S, et al
    . Identification of a probiotic bacteria-derived activator of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor that inhibits colitis. Immunol Cell Biol 2014;92:460–465.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Zelante T,
    2. Iannitti RG,
    3. Cunha C, et al
    . Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity 2013;39:372–385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Opitz CA,
    2. Litzenburger UM,
    3. Sahm F, et al
    . An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 2011;478:197–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Monteleone I,
    2. Rizzo A,
    3. Sarra M, et al
    . Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-induced signals up-regulate IL-22 production and inhibit inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology 2011;141:237–248, 248.e1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Benson JM,
    2. Shepherd DM
    . Dietary ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor induce anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects on murine dendritic cells. Toxicol Sci 2011;124:327–338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Apetoh L,
    2. Quintana FJ,
    3. Pot C, et al
    . The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL-27. Nat Immunol 2010;11:854–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Quintana FJ,
    2. Murugaiyan G,
    3. Farez MF, et al
    . An endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand acts on dendritic cells and T cells to suppress experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:20768–20773.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gagliani N,
    2. Amezcua Vesely MC,
    3. Iseppon A, et al
    . Th17 cells transdifferentiate into regulatory T cells during resolution of inflammation. Nature 2015;523:221–225.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gramatzki D,
    2. Pantazis G,
    3. Schittenhelm J, et al
    . Aryl hydrocarbon receptor inhibition downregulates the TGF-beta/Smad pathway in human glioblastoma cells. Oncogene 2009;28:2593–2605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Song J,
    2. Clagett-Dame M,
    3. Peterson RE, et al
    . A ligand for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor isolated from lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:14694–14699.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Platten M,
    2. Ho PP,
    3. Youssef S, et al
    . Treatment of autoimmune neuroinflammation with a synthetic tryptophan metabolite. Science 2005;310:850–855.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bessede A,
    2. Gargaro M,
    3. Pallotta MT, et al
    . Aryl hydrocarbon receptor control of a disease tolerance defence pathway. Nature 2014;511:184–190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Varrin-Doyer M,
    2. Pekarek KL,
    3. Spencer CM, et al
    . Treatment of spontaneous EAE by laquinimod reduces Tfh, B cell aggregates, and disease progression. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2016;3:e272. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000272.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kaye J,
    2. Piryatinsky V,
    3. Birnberg T, et al
    . Laquinimod arrests experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by activating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113:E6145–E6152.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Berg J,
    2. Mahmoudjanlou Y,
    3. Duscha A, et al
    . The immunomodulatory effect of laquinimod in CNS autoimmunity is mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J Neuroimmunol 2016;298:9–15.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Mishra MK,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Keough MB, et al
    . Laquinimod reduces neuroaxonal injury through inhibiting microglial activation. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2014;1:409–422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Jolivel V,
    2. Luessi F,
    3. Masri J, et al
    . Modulation of dendritic cell properties by laquinimod as a mechanism for modulating multiple sclerosis. Brain 2013;136:1048–1066.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schulze-Topphoff U,
    2. Shetty A,
    3. Varrin-Doyer M, et al
    . Laquinimod, a quinoline-3-carboxamide, induces type II myeloid cells that modulate central nervous system autoimmunity. PLoS One 2012;7:e33797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Vollmer TL,
    2. Sorensen PS,
    3. Selmaj K, et al
    . A randomized placebo-controlled phase III trial of oral laquinimod for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2014;261:773–783.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Garrison PM,
    2. Tullis K,
    3. Aarts JM,
    4. Brouwer A,
    5. Giesy JP,
    6. Denison MS
    . Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1996;30:194–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Klotz L,
    2. Berthele A,
    3. Brück W, et al
    . Monitoring of blood parameters under course-modified MS therapy: substance-specific relevance and current recommendations for action [in German]. Nervenarzt 2016;87:645–659.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Marcus JF,
    2. Waubant EL
    . Updates on clinically isolated syndrome and diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Neurohospitalist 2013;3:65–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pittock SJ,
    2. McClelland RL,
    3. Mayr WT, et al
    . Clinical implications of benign multiple sclerosis: a 20-year population-based follow-up study. Ann Neurol 2004;56:303–306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rothhammer V,
    2. Quintana FJ
    . Environmental control of autoimmune inflammation in the central nervous system. Curr Opin Immunol 2016;43:46–53.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hemmer B,
    2. Kerschensteiner M,
    3. Korn T
    . Role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the course of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:406–419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Beecham AH,
    2. Patsopoulos NA, et al
    International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC), Beecham AH, Patsopoulos NA, et al. Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis. Nat Genet 2013;45:1353–1360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sawcer S, et al
    International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2, Sawcer S, et al. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature 2011;476:214–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lanz TV,
    2. Williams SK,
    3. Stojic A, et al
    . Tryptophan-2,3-Dioxygenase (TDO) deficiency is associated with subclinical neuroprotection in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep 2017;7:41271.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Mancuso R,
    2. Hernis A,
    3. Agostini S, et al
    . Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) expression and activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0130715.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Zhu WH,
    2. Lu CZ,
    3. Huang YM,
    4. Link H,
    5. Xiao BG
    . A putative mechanism on remission of multiple sclerosis during pregnancy: estrogen-induced indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase by dendritic cells. Mult Scler 2007;13:33–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Jangi S,
    2. Gandhi R,
    3. Cox LM, et al
    . Alterations of the human gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis. Nat Commun 2016;7:12015.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Liu S,
    2. da Cunha AP,
    3. Rezende RM, et al
    . The host shapes the gut microbiota via fecal microRNA. Cell Host Microbe 2016;19:32–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Mimran A,
    2. Mor F,
    3. Carmi P, et al
    . DNA vaccination with CD25 protects rats from adjuvant arthritis and induces an antiergotypic respone. J Clin Invest 2004;113:924–932.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Amirkhani A,
    2. Rajda C,
    3. Arvidsson B, et al
    . Interferon-beta affects the tryptophan metabolism in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol 2005;12:625–631.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Flaveny CA,
    2. Murray IA,
    3. Chiaro CR,
    4. Perdew GH
    . Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice. Mol Pharmacol 2009;75:1412–1420.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Shiizaki K,
    2. Ohsako S,
    3. Kawanishi M,
    4. Yagi T
    . Identification of amino acid residues in the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor causing the species-specific response to omeprazole: possible determinants for binding putative endogenous ligands. Mol Pharmacol 2014;85:279–289.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Bazzi R,
    2. Bradshaw TD,
    3. Rowlands JC,
    4. Stevens MF,
    5. Bell DR
    . 2-(4-Amino-3-methylphenyl)-5-fluorobenzothiazole is a ligand and shows species-specific partial agonism of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009;237:102–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Henry EC,
    2. Gasiewicz TA
    . Molecular determinants of species-specific agonist and antagonist activity of a substituted flavone towards the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Arch Biochem Biophys 2008;472:77–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Farez MF,
    2. Mascanfroni ID,
    3. Méndez-Huergo SP, et al
    . Melatonin contributes to the seasonality of multiple sclerosis relapses. Cell 2015;162:1338–1352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • GLOSSARY
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • STUDY FUNDING
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Preferences and User Experiences of Wearable Devices in Epilepsy A Systematic Review and Mixed-Methods Synthesis

Dr. Daniel Friedman and Dr. Sharon Chiang

► Watch

Topics Discussed

  • Multiple sclerosis

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation: 10 (2)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Online ISSN: 2332-7812

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise