Radiologically isolated syndrome in children
Clinical and radiologic outcomes
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To describe clinical and radiologic outcomes of children with incidental findings on neuroimaging suggestive of CNS demyelination (termed “radiologically isolated syndrome” or RIS).
Methods: Clinical and radiologic data were obtained from a historical cohort of children with no symptoms of demyelinating disease who had MRI scans that met the 2010 MRI criteria for dissemination in space for MS.
Results: We identified 38 children (27 girls and 11 boys) with RIS now being prospectively followed at 16 sites in 6 countries. The mean follow-up time was 4.8 ± 5.3 years. The most common reason for initial neuroimaging was headache (20/38, 53%). A first clinical event consistent with CNS demyelination occurred in 16/38 children (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 27%–60%) in a median of 2.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.0–4.3 years). Radiologic evolution developed in 23/38 children (61%; 95% CI: 44%–76%) in a median of 1.1 years (IQR 0.5–1.9 years). The presence of ≥2 unique oligoclonal bands in CSF (hazard ratio [HR] 10.9, 95% CI: 1.4–86.2, p = 0.02) and spinal cord lesions on MRI (HR 7.8, 95% CI: 1.4–43.6, p = 0.02) were associated with an increased risk of a first clinical event after adjustment for age and sex.
Conclusions: We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of children with incidental MRI findings highly suggestive of CNS demyelination. Children with RIS had a substantial risk of subsequent clinical symptoms and/or radiologic evolution. The presence of oligoclonal bands in CSF and spinal cord lesions on MRI were associated with an increased risk of a first clinical event.
GLOSSARY
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- DIS=
- dissemination in space;
- HR=
- hazard ratio;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- RIS=
- radiologically isolated syndrome
Footnotes
Coinvestigators are listed at Neurology.org/nn.
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
Supplemental data at Neurology.org/nn
- Received April 25, 2017.
- Accepted in final form July 7, 2017.
- Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Spinal cord lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndromeA powerful tool in diagnosis and prognosisMadeleine H. Sombekke, Mike P. Wattjes, Lisanne J. Balk et al.Neurology, December 12, 2012 -
Article
MS, MRI, and the 2010 McDonald criteriaA Canadian expert commentaryDaniel Selchen, Virender Bhan, Gregg Blevins et al.Neurology, December 03, 2012 -
Articles
Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosisThe radiologically isolated syndromeD. T. Okuda, E. M. Mowry, A. Beheshtian et al.Neurology, December 10, 2008 -
Views & Reviews
Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosisImpact of the 2017 McDonald criteria on clinical practiceAndrew J. Solomon, Robert T. Naismith, Anne H. Cross et al.Neurology, October 31, 2018