Strategies for treatment of childhood primary angiitis of the central nervous system
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective Childhood primary angiitis of the CNS (cPACNS) is a devastating neurologic disease. No standardized treatment protocols exist, and evidence is limited to open-label cohort studies and case reports. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature and provide informed treatment recommendations.
Methods A scoping review of cPACNS literature from January 2000 to December 2018 was conducted using Ovid, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Vasculitis Foundation, European Vasculitis Society, CanVasc, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Potentially relevant articles were selected for full-text review using the STROBE checklist if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) reported treatment, (2) addressed pediatrics, (3) focused on the disease of interest, (4) included ≥5 patients, (5) original research, and (6) full-length articles. Reviews, expert opinions, editorials, case reports with <5 patients, articles lacking treatment information, or non-English articles were excluded. A standardized assessment tool measured study quality. Treatment and outcomes were summarized.
Results Of 2,597 articles screened, 7 studies were deemed high quality. No trials were available so no meta-analysis was possible. Overall, treatment strategies recommended are induction with acute antithrombotic therapy subsequently followed by high-dose oral prednisone taper over 3–12 months and long-term platelet therapy. In angiography-positive progressive–cPACNS and angiography-negative–cPACNS, we also recommend 6 months of IV cyclophosphamide therapy, with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as part of induction, and maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid.
Conclusion No grade-A evidence exists; however, this review provides recommendations for treatment of cPACNS.
Glossary
- AN=
- angiography-negative;
- APNP=
- angiography-positive nonprogressive;
- APP=
- angiography-positive progressive;
- ASA=
- aspirin;
- CA=
- conventional angiography;
- cPACNS=
- childhood primary angiitis of the CNS;
- DSA=
- digital subtraction angiography;
- IVMP=
- IV methylprednisolone;
- MMF=
- mycophenolate mofetil;
- MRA=
- magnetic resonance angiography;
- NASCET=
- North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial;
- PedsQL=
- Pediatric Quality of Life;
- PGA=
- Physicians Global Assessment;
- PSOM=
- Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure;
- vWF=
- von Willebrand factor
Childhood primary angiitis of the CNS (cPACNS) is an increasingly recognized inflammatory brain disease. Previously healthy children present with severe neurologic deficits that, left untreated, could lead to devastating neurologic insult and even death. Early recognition and intervention with targeted therapy has led to better survival. The term PACNS was first coined by Calabrese for adults in 19881 and has been adjusted for the pediatric population: patients <18 years of age presenting with a newly acquired focal or diffuse neurologic or psychiatric deficit without an underlying systemic disorder and evidence of vasculitis on angiography and/or histopathology.2
Classification of cPACNS is based on vessel size, with 3 subtypes recognized: angiography-positive nonprogressive (APNP) and angiography-positive progressive (APP) disease, affecting the large/medium-sized vessels, and angiography-negative (AN) disease, affecting small cerebral vessels.2,3 Children with APNP-cPACNS typically present with a monophasic event consisting of focal neurologic deficits and evidence of ischemic stroke on MRI with corroborating angiography.2,4,5 Patients with APP-cPACNS present with both focal and diffuse neurologic deficits4,5 and progressive vessel narrowing on angiography beyond 3 months of disease.2 In contrast, patients with AN-cPACNS exhibit normal angiography because of the difficulty in observing small vessels on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).6,7 However, MRI is frequently abnormal, characterized by multifocal inflammatory lesions not specific to any vessel distribution or territory.8,9 Thus, elective brain biopsy is mandated for diagnostic confirmation of AN-cPACNS.4,7,10 Children typically present with both focal and diffuse neurologic and psychiatric deficits together with seizures.3,4,7,9 The overall incidence of cPACNS remains unknown.
Similar to many other pediatric diseases, treatment is predominantly derived from adult PACNS literature.10,11 While therapeutic strategies for cPACNS have been described, they come largely from observational and open-label cohort studies because of the absence of randomized control trials and are not standardized across centers. To date, no scoping review of the pediatric literature on treatment of cPACNS has been performed. Therefore, in this review, we aim to describe the evidence and efficacy of treatment regimens reported in the pediatric literature.
Methods
Search strategy and selection criteria
A scoping review of the literature was conducted for the timeframe January 2000 to December 2018. Databases utilized in the search were Ovid, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Vasculitis Foundation, EUVAS (European Vasculitis Society), CanVasc, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Searches were conducted with MeSH terms, including vasculitis, vasculitides, angiitis, angiitides, arteritis, central nervous system, CNS, brain, cerebral PACNS, pediatric, adolescent, child, and infant.
Studies were eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) treatment reported, (2) pediatric population addressed, (3) focused on disease of interest, cPACNS, (4) included ≥5 patients, (5) original research, and (6) full-length articles. Only articles written in English were included. Reviews, expert opinions, editorials, case reports, and studies without treatment information were excluded. Studies were screened by perusing titles and abstracts for relative content. Articles deemed relevant were selected for full-text review and individually assessed for inclusion criteria using the STROBE checklist for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies by 2 of 4 reviewers: J.B., A.D., B.G., and M.T. In case of conflicting evaluations, a third reviewer, S.M.B., was asked to make the final decision. Selected articles were assessed for quality. Studies reporting data on the same population were included individually and discussed together.
Data analysis
Quality was assessed through utilization of a modified version of Pasma et al.12 Quality Assessment Tool. Questions addressed patient recruitment through sampling method, participation, treatment and outcome measurements, and conflict declaration. Nonrelevant questions were dropped from the tool. Three questions were deemed essential: >80% participation, reproducible treatment strategy, and reproducible outcome measure. A score of 1 was given to each question on satisfaction of both reviewers' assessment, with a maximum total score of 6. A study with a total score of 4 or higher and at least 2 of 3 essential questions was considered high quality.
Studies were evaluated for design, location, sample size, and patient demographics. This information together with treatment strategies and outcomes was aggregated. Studies were compared by diagnostic subtype, treatment regimen, and outcomes. Acceptable study outcomes included mortality and neurologic outcome, preferably using the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure (PSOM),13 a determinant of neurologic dysfunction across 4 domains: sensorimotor, language production, language comprehension, and cognition/behavior.
Role of funding source
There was no funding source for this study. The corresponding authors had full access to all the data in the study and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Data availability
Data not provided in this article including comprehensive treatment and outcome summaries and search strategies are available to be shared by request.
Results
The search strategy identified a total of 2,596 articles, with 1 additional study identified by author MT (figure 1). Of 2,597 articles screened for title and abstract, 110 articles had full-text retrieval for assessment of inclusion criteria and 9 original articles were included for detailed analysis2,4,9,14,–,19 (figure 1). Reasons for article exclusion included: treatment description missing (n = 24), exclusion of pediatric population (n = 8), not PACNS (n = 5), case reports <5 children (n = 20), book chapters/reviews/editorials (n = 39), and abstract only (n = 5). Seven studies were deemed high quality after quality assessment was conducted. Study characteristics are summarized in table. Of 9 studies reviewed, 4 described the same study population from Lahore, Pakistan16,–,19; 4 studies described the same population from Toronto, Canada2,4,9,14; and 1 reported a case series from Los Angeles, US.15
Summarized description of included studies
The Pakistani group16,–,19 identified children <16 years of age subsequently diagnosed with cPACNS at their center between January 2009 and December 2010. Diagnostic categorization was two-fold: based on stroke characteristics and cPACNS subtype. A total of 68 patients were identified: 50 presented with ischemic stroke, 10 with hemorrhagic stroke, and 8 with both ischemic and hemorrhagic lesions. Alternatively, 51 patients were classified as APNP-cPACNS and 17 as APP-cPACNS. Diagnoses were based on conventional angiography (CA) and/or MRA in all patients.
Induction therapy, 3 days of IV methylprednisolone (IVMP), and/or IV immunoglobulin for 5 days with subsequent oral prednisone taper over 30 days, was completed by 56 patients. Patients with ischemic stroke also received IV heparin and subsequent oral anticoagulation therapy. Supplementary calcium and vitamin D were prescribed with anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, antibiotics, antivirals, and antacids as needed. A total of 12 patients died before completing induction therapy from complications involving cerebral artery and/or parenchymal bleeding. The remaining 41 patients were allocated to 24 months of maintenance therapy consisting of either aspirin (ASA) daily for ischemic stroke or together with daily azathioprine for progressive arteriopathies. Despite a clearly delineated therapeutic regimen, the Pakistani group reported conflicting data in regard to the number of patients assigned to each therapy across the 4 studies. Both the initial study by Malik et al.19 and Alhaboob et al.16 identified 41 patients assigned to ASA alone and 15 patients to ASA together with azathioprine for 24 months. However, Malik et al.17 indicated that 40 patients were assigned to the 24 months ASA only group, and 16 patients to ASA and azathioprine, with ASA duration increased to 60 months in this study. Malik et al.18 did not provide details of induction therapy, only that ischemic infarcts were initially treated with IV heparin. From this group, 40 patients were discharged on ASA for 24 months and 14 received adjunctive azathioprine therapy.
The Pakistani group reported mortality and morbidity across different intervals. Remission was described as a complete absence of disease activity in clinical symptoms, exam findings, lab markers, and imaging for at least 3 months, and relapse was defined as an emergence of signs/symptoms of stroke confirmed by neuroimaging (CA and/or MRA) after remission. All 4 studies documented mortality at discharge in 12 patients (17·6%). Malik et al.17,–,19 reported clinical state at time of discharge for all survivors, defined as neurologic assessment for motor, visual, and/or speech difficulties. Normal examination was reported in 11 (20%), minor disability in 14 (25%), moderate disability in 11 (20%), and severe disability in 20 (35%) patients. Malik et al.15 described relapse in a total of 30 patients (54%) during maintenance therapy. From the ASA only group, 18 patients (45%) relapsed within the first 24 months, which resulted in 10 deaths, and of the remaining 22 patients (55%) who completed ASA therapy, 5 relapsed and 5 died. Overall mortality in the ASA group was 15/40 (38·5%). Of the 16 patients on maintenance with ASA and azathioprine, 2 patients (13%) relapsed within 24 months and both survived. The number of deaths reported was 5 (31%): 3 patients died from massive cerebral hemorrhage, and 2 of 3 patients died after relapse within 6 months of successfully completing therapy. Therefore, the overall mortality during maintenance reported by Malik et al.17 at a medium follow-up of 34 months was 20 (35·7%) of the initial 56 survivors, either as a direct result or as a complication of first or second relapse, with 5 deaths reportedly due to non-cPACNS causes. Malik et al.17 also reported the outcome at last follow-up using the PSOM.13 From the 32 patients assessed: 8 (25%) a normal outcome, 10 (31%) minor disabilities, 10 (31%) moderate disabilities, 4 (13%) severe disabilities, and 4 patients were lost to follow-up.
The Canadian studies2,4,9,14 similarly identified patients from the same center, though each study varied in sample size and diagnostic subtype. Benseler et al.2 identified 62 children <18 years of age between January 1990 to December 2002 diagnosed with AP-cPACNS: 42 APNP-cPACNS and 20 APP-cPACNS. Diagnoses were based on MRA and/or CA abnormalities.
All patients received antithrombotic therapy with ASA, heparin, or warfarin. A total of 41 patients (65%) continued with this treatment approach long-term: 33 patients with APNP-cPACNS and 7 patients with APP-cPACNS. In contrast, 22 patients (35%) received immunosuppressive intervention with steroids alone or a combination of steroids and IV cyclophosphamide: 9 (41%) APNP-cPACNS and 13 (59%) APP-cPACNS. Benseler et al.2 measured outcome at last evaluation (mean 20 months) as complete neurologic recovery, defined as neurologic deficit severity score of 0 on PSOM; any other deficit severity score was defined as incomplete recovery. A total of 22 patients (35%) made a complete neurologic recovery: 13 (31%) of APNP-cPACNS and 9 (45%) of APP-cPACNS. No deaths were reported.
Hutchinson et al.9 identified 19 patients <18 years of age with AN-cPACNS diagnosis between January 2002 and December 2009. MRA, venography, and CA were used. Diagnosis in all patients was based on a confirmatory biopsy. Patients received induction and maintenance therapy for 24 months. Induction therapy was defined as 6 months of IV cyclophosphamide monthly, together with Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis, oral prednisone daily, supplementary calcium, vitamin D, and anticonvulsants/antipsychotics as needed. Thirteen patients (68%) completed induction and went on to maintenance therapy. Maintenance consisted of an additional 18 months of therapy, with 5 patients (35%) assigned to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and 9 (65%) assigned to azathioprine with anticonvulsants/antipsychotics as needed. Seven (78%) of 9 patients on azathioprine switched to MMF because of treatment failure or intolerance. Only 5 patients (36%) completed maintenance therapy and were taken off medication. Primary outcome was assessed on PSOM at 24 months, with good outcome defined as a score of ≤0·5 across each of the 4 domains. Secondary outcomes included treatment efficacy and safety, determined by PSOM at 12 months and final follow-up, disease flare, and discontinuation of immunosuppressants. Good neurologic outcome on PSOM at 12 months was reported in 8 (50%) of 16 patients and 9 (70%) of 13 at final follow-up. Disease flare during treatment was described in 8 patients (42%): 2/19 (11%) during induction, 5/14 (36%) during maintenance, and 1/5 (20%) off medication. No patients relapsed on MMF. Of 5 patients who completed maintenance therapy, 4 achieved remission, defined as complete absence of disease activity in clinical symptoms, examination findings, lab markers, and imaging for at least 3 months. Safety was determined by mortality, serious infection, and each of cataracts, avascular necrosis, vertebral fractures, or type II diabetes mellitus. No patients in this study died; however, 2 were reported to have had a serious infection requiring hospital admission; 1 developed cataracts, 1 avascular necrosis, and 3 with vertebral fractures. No diabetes mellitus was reported. Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL)20 was reported for both child and parent at final follow-up, together with cognitive outcome testing by the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children IV and Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale III at 14 months postdiagnosis. Abnormal scores were defined as any index scores that were ≥1 SDs below the mean of the normative sample. The PedsQL questionnaire was completed by 17 patients and 15 parents: median physical score was 78 (range = 0–100) for children and 66 (range = 9–100) for parents, and median psychosocial score 73 (range = 27–100) for children and 63 (range = 37–100) for parents. Cognitive outcome was assessed in 10 children: Full Scale Intelligence Quotient was reported as abnormal in 8 (80%), working memory in all 10 (100%), verbal comprehension in 7 (70%), perceptual reasoning in 6 (60%), and processing speed in 5 (50%).
Cellucci et al.4 identified 39 patients <18 years of age between June 2001 and October 2010 diagnosed with cPACNS: 14 AP-cPACNS, not further subdivided, and 25 AN-cPACNS. AP-cPACNS diagnosis was based on CA and/or MRA (n = 14). AN-cPACNS diagnosis was based on confirmatory biopsy in 22 patients. Patients without biopsy had features, blood work, and lumbar puncture consistent with AN-cPACNS. Some patients with AP-cPACNS were also represented in the Benseler et al.2 study and in the Hutchinson et al.9 study.
All 14 patients with AP-cPACNS received ASA, and 9 (64%) received additional anticoagulation with unfractionated/low-molecular weight heparin for 2 months. High-dose prednisone was prescribed in all but 1 patient with AP-cPACNS, with a varied tapering schedule: 2–6 months in 6 patients (46%) and 12 months in 7 (54%). IV cyclophosphamide over 6 months followed by MMF or azathioprine was given to a further 7 patients (54%) with AP-cPACNS; 1 patient with AP-cPACNS received anticoagulation therapy only. High-dose prednisone with 12-months taper was prescribed in all patients with AN-cPACNS. IV cyclophosphamide for 6 months in combination with azathioprine or MMF was reported in 20 patients (80%) with AN-cPACNS, while azathioprine or MMF alone as induction/maintenance therapy was described in 3 patients (12%) with AN-cPACNS. Two patients (8%) with AN-cPACNS did not receive therapy. Outcomes were reported serially across 24 months and included disease activity as measured by the Physicians Global Assessment (PGA), a visual analog scale with a score of zero indicating no disease activity and 10 indicating severe activity; von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen levels where high numbers indicate high disease activity with >1·40 IU/mL being considered abnormal; and neurologic outcome on PSOM with good outcome defined as a score of ≤0·5 across each domain. Disease activity was elevated at time of diagnosis, but significantly decreased over time in all patients (p < 0·001). vWF antigen levels decreased over time (p < 0·001). PSOM summary scores decreased significantly over time (p < 0·001), with 52% of patients having a good neurologic outcome at 12 months, and 65% at 24 months. A total of 6 (15%) developed disease flare during follow-up defined as an increase in PGA by at least 1 cm in presence of recurrent symptoms, laboratory changes, and/or MRI findings. No patients died.
Elbers et al.14 described 27 patients <18 years of age with AP-cPACNS diagnosed between January 1998 and December 2013. Diagnosis was based on MRA and DSA abnormalities. Patients might overlap with the Benseler et al.2 and Cellucci et al.4 studies. Acute treatment with unfractionated heparin was described in 23 patients (85%): 5 subsequently transitioned to warfarin, 17 to ASA, and none in 1. ASA alone, or with immunosuppression, was described in the remaining 4 patients. Two patients received chronic immunosuppression with MMF and 1 received plasmapheresis. IVMP together with a 3-month oral steroid taper was described in 12 patients, with no long-term immunosuppression. An additional 7 patients were treated with acyclovir. Outcomes included vascular imaging at 12 months, assessed using the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria and described as improved (normal angiography, improved flow, or fewer abnormal vessels), stable (no change in flow abnormality or number of involved vessels), or worsened (involvement of new vessels or worsening of an existing flow abnormality by at least 1 point on follow-up imaging), and possibly discordant (worsened patients where a new or worsening arterial abnormality coexisted with an improved or normalized vessel), as well as stroke recurrence. The NASCET criteria scores vessel narrowing from 1 to 4 progressing from normal (0%–9%), to mild (10%–29%), moderate (30%–69%), and severe stenosis (70%–99%) or complete occlusion (no flow detected). A total of 10 (37%) patients were described as improved, 4 of which received steroids as treatment; 6 (22%) as stable, 2 of which received steroids; and 11 (41%) worsened with 7 described as discordant, 6 of which received steroids. Stroke recurrence was reported in 4 patients (15%). No patients died.
Gallagher et al.15 described 5 cases of AP-cPACNS at their center with no fixed treatment regimen. Diagnosis was based on MRA and/or CA abnormalities. Two patients were treated with IVMP, either at their first or subsequent disease presentation. All patients received IV cyclophosphamide; however, 1 discontinued after the first infusion due to intolerance. All patients received oral prednisone of varying doses; 2 received short-term (<6 months) steroid therapy, 2 remained on oral steroids long-term (>6 months), and 1 was lost to follow-up after 6 months. One patient received long-term treatment with azathioprine and 2 with methotrexate. Four (80%) of the 5 patients received anticoagulation therapy with either ASA or warfarin during their illness. No validated outcome measures were used to assess outcomes for these patients; however, at last follow-up, 3 patients were reported as neurologically asymptomatic, 1 had mild residual deficits, and 1 was lost to follow-up but continued on treatment at their last documented visit.
Discussion
This is the first scoping review of treatment in cPACNS. Despite the paucity of randomized clinical trials, evidence in the literature offers support for treatment strategies. For APNP-cPACNS, the authors recommend treatment with long-term antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of stroke relapse and mortality as reported in the Pakistani cohort.16,–,19 The authors concur with CNS vasculitis expert opinion in recommending short-term immunosuppressive with IVMP and acute antithrombotic therapy, subsequently followed by high-dose oral prednisone (figure 2A).3,10,21,–,23 In APP-cPACNS, the authors support a combination of anticoagulation and induction therapy, with both IV steroids and IV cyclophosphamide with steroid taper (figure 2B)3,4,15,–,19 to increase the prospect of neurologic recovery.3,10,15,21,–,26 Induction therapy for AN-cPACNS should similarly consist of IV steroids and IV cyclophosphamide (figure 2C). Evidence in the literature9,10,21,–,24 for long-term maintenance therapy in APP-cPACNS and AN-cPACNS supports daily MMF/mycophenolic acid in preference to azathioprine to avoid the possibility of treatment failure or intolerance, as reported by Hutchinson et al.9 and the Pakistani group (figures 2B, 2C).16,–,19
In refractory disease, Batthish et al.25 reported successful use of infliximab therapy in treating 2 cases of AN-cPACNS with good control of inflammation and subsequent prevention of brain damage. Rosati et al.26 recently published a case series of 4 patients with AP-cPACNS successfully treated with long-term MMF. All revealed subsequent stability or improvement on MRI/MRA with no progression of arterial disease, and no relapses were reported in the follow-up period (range 10–42 months).26 Sen et al.24 also report successful maintenance treatment with MMF in 3 cases of cPACNS that had failed methotrexate or azathioprine and steroid treatment alone. No patients were reported to have had recurring symptoms, side effects, or new lesions on MRI.24
While this review provided a comprehensive review of treatment literature in cPACNS, there were several limitations. Based on our quality assessment definition for Q4, a minimum of 1 reproducible reported outcome was sufficient to satisfy outcome reproducibility. Many studies satisfied this criterion by reporting mortality, despite a lack of or irreproducibility of supplementary outcomes. Furthermore, using a validated measure like the PSOM was sufficient to satisfy the Q5 requirement. While the Pakistani group utilized the PSOM in outcome assessment, the lack of outcome definitions led to difficulty in result generalizability. Finally, while the same patient cohort was included in all 4 Pakistani group studies and treatment regimens were well described, the number of patients reported to each treatment arm was grossly inconsistent and calculated incorrectly. Despite these contradictions, the studies sufficiently satisfied the reproducible treatment criterion and were consequently rated high quality. Therefore, the authors believe that the quality assessment for a number of studies reviewed is overstated; were these studies to be rescored retrospectively, they would be deemed low quality. Finally, the case series by Gallagher et al.,15 despite meeting inclusion criteria, only described case reports with inconsistent treatment regimens and lacked validated outcome measures.
In conclusion, available literature on treatment in cPACNS were thoroughly reviewed and findings summarized. Based on the evidence and current expert opinion, the authors provide recommendations for cPACNS treatment strategies. Rapid initiation with the recommended therapeutic interventions would serve to optimize survival and prevent permanent brain injury in patients with cPACNS to achieve the best possible outcome.
Study funding
No targeted funding.
Disclosure
J. Beelen reports no disclosures; S. Benseler serves on the editorial board for Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation; A. Dropol, B. Ghali, and M. Twilt reports no disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank librarian Rachel Zhao for her contribution to the development and application of the search strategy.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
- Received January 24, 2019.
- Accepted in final form March 4, 2019.
- Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- Cellucci T,
- Tyrrell PN,
- Twilt M,
- Sheikh S,
- Benseler SM
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- Aviv RI,
- Benseler SM,
- DeVeber G, et al
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- Kitchen L,
- Westmacott R,
- Friefeld S, et al
- 14.↵
- Elbers J,
- Armstrong D,
- Yau I,
- Benseler S
- 15.↵
- Gallagher KT,
- Shaham B,
- Reiff A, et al
- 16.↵
- Alhaboob AA,
- Hasan GM,
- Malik MA,
- Rehman MZ
- 17.↵
- Malik MA,
- Ahmad N,
- Malik H
- 18.↵
- Malik MA,
- Choudry GR,
- Malik H
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- Batthish M,
- Banwell B,
- Laughlin S, et al
- 26.↵
- Rosati A,
- Cosi A,
- Basile M, et al
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Resident and Fellow Section
Child Neurology: Primary angiitis of the CNSGrace Kim, Tanuja Chitnis et al.Neurology, December 04, 2017 -
Article
Steroid-sparing maintenance immunotherapy for MOG-IgG associated disorderJohn J. Chen, Eoin P. Flanagan, M. Tariq Bhatti et al.Neurology, June 17, 2020 -
Articles
The Pediatric Stroke Recurrence and Recovery QuestionnaireValidation in a prospective cohortWarren D. Lo, Rebecca N. Ichord, Michael M. Dowling et al.Neurology, August 15, 2012 -
Article
The Pediatric Stroke Outcome MeasureA predictor of outcome following arterial ischemic strokeAnna N. Cooper, Vicki Anderson, Stephen Hearps et al.Neurology, January 29, 2018