Abstract
Objective We conducted a retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) to assess the diagnostic impact of applying age-adjusted upper limits for CSF total protein (CSF-TP) supported by a systematic literature review.
Methods Cases coded as GBS or inflammatory neuropathy for the period 2001–2016 at The Ottawa Hospital were reviewed. Cases were included if they met the Brighton criteria for GBS with a diagnostic certainty level 1 or 2 and had contemporaneous CSF-TP data. We excluded cases with CSF pleocytosis >50 and cases with Miller-Fisher syndrome. Age-adjusted reference limits were compared with conventional 0.45 and 0.6 g/L upper limits.
Results One hundred thirty-eight cases met the study criteria, with a mean age of 47 years. The mean interval from symptom onset to lumbar puncture was 7.9 days, and mean CSF-TP was 1.23 g/L. There was a strong correlation between rising CSF-TP and time to lumbar puncture. Age-adjusted CSF-TP had a significantly lower sensitivity of only 45% in the first week (32% in the first 3 days) compared with 70% in the first week for the 0.45 g/L limit. All upper limits gained high sensitivity after the first week.
Conclusions The low sensitivity of CSF-TP for the diagnosis of GBS is exacerbated by age-adjusted upper limits. The main role of lumbar puncture in GBS in the first week may be to help exclude other inflammatory or neoplastic etiologies of acute neuropathy. After the first week, the magnitude of the CSF-TP rise reduces the effect of different upper reference limits.
Glossary
- CSF-TP=
- CSF total protein;
- GBS=
- Guillain-Barré syndrome;
- Ig=
- immunoglobulin;
- URL=
- upper reference limit
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
- Received March 7, 2019.
- Accepted in final form March 28, 2019.
- Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg