Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

Share

July 2020; 7 (4) ArticleOpen Access

Monoclonal antibody treatment during pregnancy and/or lactation in women with MS or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Andrea Ines Ciplea, Annette Langer-Gould, Annick de Vries, Tiny Schaap, Sandra Thiel, Marius Ringelstein, Ralf Gold, Kerstin Hellwig
First published April 23, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000723
Andrea Ines Ciplea
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annette Langer-Gould
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annick de Vries
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tiny Schaap
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Thiel
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marius Ringelstein
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralf Gold
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerstin Hellwig
From the Department of Neurology (A.I.C., S.T., R.G., K.H.), St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy (A.I.C.), Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente (A.L.-G.), Los Angeles Medical Center, Neurology Department, Los Angeles, CA; Sanquin Diagnostic Services (A.V., T.S.), Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (M.R.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University; and Department of Neurology (M.R.), Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Monoclonal antibody treatment during pregnancy and/or lactation in women with MS or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
Andrea Ines Ciplea, Annette Langer-Gould, Annick de Vries, Tiny Schaap, Sandra Thiel, Marius Ringelstein, Ralf Gold, Kerstin Hellwig
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Jul 2020, 7 (4) e723; DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000723

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1818

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective To assess possible adverse effects on breastfed infants of mothers receiving monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) during pregnancy and/or lactation.

Methods We identified 23 patients from the German Multiple Sclerosis and Pregnancy Registry (DMSKW) who received MAbs (17 natalizumab and 6 anti-CD20) during lactation. Thirteen were already exposed to natalizumab during the third trimester of pregnancy, and 1 received ocrelizumab during pregnancy. Data were obtained from standardized, telephone-administered questionnaires completed by the mother during pregnancy and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum. Natalizumab concentration in mother’s milk was analyzed in 3 patients and natalizumab serum concentration in 2 of these patients and their breastfed infants.

Results We did not observe a negative impact on infant health and development attributable to breast milk exposure after a median follow-up of 1 year. Infants exposed to natalizumab during the third trimester had a lower birth weight and more hospitalizations in the first year of life. The concentration of natalizumab in breast milk and serum of infants was low; B cells normal in infants breastfed under anti-CD20.

Conclusion More data on the effect of Mab exposure during pregnancy are needed. Otherwise, our data suggest that treatment with natalizumab, ocrelizumab, or rituximab during lactation might be safe for breastfed infants.

Glossary

CBC=
complete blood count;
MAb=
monoclonal antibody;
NMOSD=
neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder;
NTZ=
natalizumab;
OCR=
ocrelizumab;
RID=
relative infant dose;
RTX=
rituximab

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are considered compatible with lactation by gastroenterologists and rheumatologists,1,2 yet breastfeeding under MAb treatment is generally not recommended by neurologists. Two classes of MAbs, natalizumab (NTZ) and CD20-depleting agents, rituximab (RTX) and ocrelizumab (OCR), are highly effective therapy options for women at a high risk of pregnancy-related MS relapses with apparently undetectable or minimal transfer into breast milk in 7 NTZ-exposed and 10 RTX-exposed breast milk samples.3,–,6 Whether these minimally detectable breast milk levels pose any risk to the infants is unknown, leading many experts to be exceedingly cautious. This is potentially problematic as withholding breastfeeding may deprive the mother and child of multiple important health benefits.7 Herein, we present a cohort of 23 women with MS or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from the German Multiple Sclerosis and Pregnancy Registry (DMSKW) who breastfed under MAbs with follow-up of their offspring.

Methods

The DMSKW is a prospective nationwide cohort study for pregnant women with MS or NMOSD. Data are collected by a standardized telephone-administered questionnaire at regular intervals during pregnancy and postpartum (pp).8 Inclusion criteria for these analyses were live birth and breastfeeding while on MAb treatment through September 2019. Breastfeeding under MAb was defined as breastfeeding for at least 1 day after the first pp MAb infusion. If the last MAb infusion during pregnancy was administered within 100 days of delivery for NTZ and 130 days for OCR (<5 half-lives), infants were considered exposed during breastfeeding from the first day of life. The following outcomes were collected: hospitalization with any overnight admission, any infection requiring antibiotic treatment or hospitalization during the first year of life. For the percentages of infants with ≥12 months of follow-up at least hospitalized or treated with antibiotics once, we included in the numerator the event in any infant (irrespective of the length of follow-up) but in the denominator, only infants with ≥12 months of follow-up.

Weight was compared with age- and sex-specific values obtained from the general German pediatric population, excluding preterm births (<completed 37 weeks of gestation [gw]).9 Developmental delay was defined as any delay reported by the mother during the interview and confirmed by the treating pediatrician. MS relapses were defined using the current McDonald criteria.10 Anemia and thrombocytopenia were classified as follows: “no” if the proportion of hemoglobin/thrombocytes was >100%/>99% of the laboratory reference value, respectively, “mild” between 100 and 91%/>50%, “moderate” between 91 and 64%/>30%, and “severe” if it was <64%/<30%.

NTZ concentrations in serum and breast milk were determined as described previously by a highly sensitive cross-linking assay11,12 at Sanquin Diagnostic Services (Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

The relative infant dose (RID)13 was calculated by dividing the absolute infant dose by the maternal dose. For calculation of the absolute infant dose, the respective maximum NTZ concentration in milk and an estimated daily milk intake of 150 mL/kg were used.

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

The DMSKW is approved by the local institutional review board of the Ruhr University Bochum (18-6474-BR). All women voluntarily enrolled and gave informed consent.

Data availability

No deidentified patient data will be shared. No related study-related documents will be shared. Reasonable requests from any qualified investigator for anonymized data will be considered by the corresponding author.

Results

Of 2,120 pregnancies, we identified 23 women who breastfed under MAbs: 17 under NTZ, 3 RTX, 2 OCR, and 1 received RTX and OCR. The characteristics of the cohort are shown in table 1; the MAb exposure with relevant outcomes are shown in tables 2 and 3 (stratified according to exposure during the third trimester of pregnancy and breastfeeding and to exposure only during breastfeeding). Most women continued NTZ throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding (n = 13, 76%). Only 1 woman received OCR during pregnancy (2nd trimester) following 2 relapses; she was treated with 3 cycles of alemtuzumab before pregnancy. Three of 4 (17%) women with relapses during pregnancy were treated with alemtuzumab, fingolimod, or NTZ before but not during pregnancy, and 1 woman continued glatiramer acetate during pregnancy. The first NTZ infusion postpartum was administered after a median of 14 days (range 1–124 days) after the date of delivery and the first RTX infusion after a median of 8 days (range 4–26 days). OCR patients started after 20 and 194 days, and the woman breastfeeding under RTX and OCR received her infusions after 55 and 333 days postpartum, respectively. The 4 women with postpartum relapses had either not been treated with MAbs before (n = 2) or had stopped NTZ during the 1st trimester (n = 2). All pregnancy and postpartum relapses were treated with IV corticosteroids.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the mothers

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of infants exposed to natalizumab during the third trimester of pregnancy

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3

Clinical characteristics of infants unexposed to a monoclonal antibody during the third trimester of pregnancy

Pregnancy outcomes

Four singleton infants (17%) were born preterm. Two exposed to NTZ through pregnancy were delivered at 36 gw (incompetent cervix) and 37 gw (planned cesarean section because of elevated liver enzymes without other signs for HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) (table 2). One infant was delivered in 37 gw due to failure to thrive since 32 gw due to placental insufficiency. The mother (fingolimod before pregnancy) had a severe relapse during pregnancy that required treatment with IV corticosteroids and plasma exchange. Another infant was delivered at 30 gw following premature rupture of membranes from incompetent cervix. The mother had received RTX for 4 years with the last dose 3 months before pregnancy with recurrent urinary tract infections and hypogammaglobulinemia (465 mg/dL) before and during pregnancy and received IV immunoglobulins during pregnancy (table 3).

Infant outcomes

Median birth weight in term infants was 3,315 g (range 2,520–3,690 g) in girls and 3,260 g (range 2,660–3,810 g) in boys but lower in newborns exposed to NTZ in the last trimester of pregnancy (table 4). Physical growth was normal at all well-baby visits during exposed breastfeeding for almost all full-term infants. Only 2 male infants fell below the 3rd percentile with 1 body measurement (birth weight or head circumference at well-baby visits at 1 or 3–4 months of age, respectively), but caught up during exposed breastfeeding. One was exposed to NTZ during the 3rd trimester, and the second only during breastfeeding. In our whole cohort, at least 1 antibiotic treatment was given in 30% of boys and 15% of girls. In those infants with at least 12 months of follow-up (n = 6 and n = 9), 3 boys (50%) and 2 girls (22%) received at least 1 antibiotic treatment (expected in the general German population, males: 27% and females: 25%).14 So far, 3 (30%) boys and 4 (31%) girls in our cohort have been hospitalized at least once within the first year of life (range of follow-up time 2.8–49.0 months). Considering only those with a follow-up of ≥12 months, 3 boys (50%) and 4 (44%) girls were hospitalized. This compares with an expected percentage of 18.7% in males and 14.9% in females in Germany.15 Four hospitalizations occurred immediately after birth for the following reasons: 2 prematurity and in 2 complications after birth including neonatal infection in both. In 2 cases, hospitalization was a precautionary measure: cough in one and suspicion of gastroenteritis without fever and diarrhea without therapy in the second (table 2). All relevant infections of infants exposed during the third trimester of pregnancy entailed hospitalization (table 2). More infants with third-trimester NTZ exposure were hospitalized compared with unexposed children. Table 4 stratifies our cohort into observed vs expected outcomes according to MAb exposure during the third trimester of pregnancy and during breastfeeding only, in comparison to German reference populations. There was 1 child with a major congenital malformation (ventricular septal defect).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4

Numbers of observed adverse outcomes in the cohort vs expected

Chronic diseases included pediatric asthma and hazelnut allergy (n = 1 each). One infant (NTZ throughout pregnancy) suffers from slight generalized muscular hypotonia due to perinatal asphyxia, but at the age of 6 months his medical examination was satisfactory. No infants had developmental delays.

Hematologic abnormalities

We received results of complete blood counts (CBCs) during breastfeeding in 7 (41%) (at birth in 12 [71%]) infants breastfed under NTZ, 2 of whom were exposed only through breast milk (tables 2 and 3). Both of these infants had normal CBCs. In contrast, only 1 (20%) of the infants exposed to NTZ throughout pregnancy and through breast milk had continuously normal CBCs, 2 developed mild or moderate hematologic anomalies during breastfeeding, and in total, 5 (50%) had a mild or moderate anemia and/or mild thrombocytopenia at birth.

Five (83%) infants exposed to B cell–depleting MAbs during breastfeeding had normal B cells (above the lower limit of normal 600/μL). In 2 infants (OCR in the 2nd trimester and RTX 16 months before the date of delivery) the B-cell count was decreased at birth (CD19: 339/μL and 218/μL, respectively) but normalized during exposed breastfeeding at 79 and 93 days postpartum, respectively.

Maternal, infant, and breast milk NTZ levels

Three mothers provided milk samples at different time points during NTZ-exposed breastfeeding; 2 also provided maternal and infant blood samples to analyze NTZ concentrations in both mothers and babies (figure). Although trace amounts of NTZ were detectable in breast milk (<1% of maternal serum values; maximum RID: 0.5%), the MAb was not detectable in the infants' sera after pp infusion.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure Natalizumab concentration in breast milk and blood samples of mothers and their breastfed infants

Left: natalizumab concentrations (in micrograms per milliliter) in the breast milk of mothers 2 and 3 on several days after the first infusion postpartum and of mother 1 on several days after the fourth infusion postpartum. Right: natalizumab concentration (in micrograms per milliliter) in sera of mothers 2 and 3 and babies 2 and 3. Maternal serum concentrations were measured at 2 time points after the first infusion postpartum; the serum level of baby 2 was measured before and at 2 points after the first infusion postpartum; for baby 3, it was available only at 1 time point after the first infusion. aBelow the detection limit; bSample stability issues.

Discussion

In our small prospective cohort of women with MS and NMOSD breastfeeding under MAbs, we found no signal of harmful clinical or biological effects attributable to breast milk exposure. The infants showed normal growth and no negative effect on development. We also observed that infants who were exposed to NTZ during the third trimester of pregnancy had a lower birth weight (both sexes) and were hospitalized more often during the first year of life (both sexes).

The number of infants with at least 1 antibiotic treatment within the first year of life in the total cohort was consistent with expected national rates,14 only noticeably elevated in boys with ≥12 months of follow-up. Percentages of infants hospitalized at least once in the total cohort were higher than expected due to the high numbers in third-trimester NTZ-exposed children. As the sample size for the different groups was small and the outcomes rare, it is unclear whether this is a chance finding or if it is related to the treatment during pregnancy, especially because distribution of percentages differed between sex and follow-up period.

We did find an overall lower than expected median birth weight (around 270 g in boys and 75 g in girls), albeit not very low, in comparison to the general German population.9 This effect was mainly driven by infants exposed to NTZ during the third trimester of pregnancy, which is in line with previous findings after 3rd-trimester NTZ exposure.16

We also found a slightly higher than expected number of preterm births (observed: 17%, expected: 10%)17,18 in the whole cohort, perhaps reflecting the underlying more active MS or drug exposure. Hematologic abnormalities, particularly in those with continuous in utero exposure to NTZ, are well documented and therefore not unexpected.16,19 It is very reassuring that these laboratory abnormalities resolved, and the infants grew and developed normally despite continued low-level MAb exposure through breast milk.

We detected very low levels of NTZ in breast milk similar to previous reports.3,4,20 A tool to assess the safety of a certain drug exposure via breast milk is the RID.13 It is calculated by dividing the absolute infant dose (concentration in breast milk multiplied by daily milk intake [150 mL/kg]) by the maternal dose. Drugs with RIDs <10% are considered probably safe for a healthy child.21 When calculated with the respective maximum concentration in breast milk, maximum RID in our analyses was 0.5%, i.e., far below the theoretically accepted cutoff of 10%. We did not detect accumulation of NTZ in breast milk after up to 4 infusions in contrast to others who found a steady accumulation of NTZ after the 2nd infusion (n = 1) and higher levels of NTZ after each additional infusion up to the 2nd (n = 2) or up to the 4th administration (n = 1). These dissimilarities are likely due to well-described interindividual variability in natalizumab levels,4,22 particularly because both studies are limited by very small sample sizes. Even with an increasing amount of the MAb in breast milk, the possibility of systemic absorption in the infant via neonatal Fc receptor seems not to be relevant in humans,23 but larger case series are needed to elucidate exact pharmacokinetics.

The decreased B-cell count at birth in the infant whose mother received the last RTX infusion 16 months before the date of delivery cannot be caused by the drug. According to the half-life of RTX of approximately 30 days, the infant could not have been exposed to the drug in utero. An error in analysis is more likely, especially as the B-cell count normalized without any intervention and no chronic disease related to B-cell deficiency was reported.

The low levels of transfer into breast milk are not surprising, as MAbs are large molecules and transfer is limited by molecular weight.13 Minimal transfer into breast milk is known for RTX5,6 and unknown but likely for OCR. In published cases of breastfeeding under RTX5,6 (n = 5) and OCR24 (n = 1), no serious adverse effects were reported.

Some have argued that even isolated breast milk exposure to MAbs could have systemic effects in the infant following transluminal absorption via the neonatal Fc receptor, FcRn. Thus, women who need these treatments are often counseled not to breastfeed. This is a theoretically weak argument, as oral absorption of IgG is exceedingly low in human neonates23 and the breast milk concentrations of MAbs are already exceedingly low. There is only 1 prior published report of detectable infant serum Mab levels resulting solely from breast milk exposure (infliximab, ∼2% of maternal serum concentration).25 In most infants, levels were undetectable.25,26 Another report of detectable infant serum levels following infliximab or adalimumab exposure was more likely attributable to late pregnancy exposures than breast milk.27 We found that NTZ serum concentrations were undetectable in 2 infants during exposed breastfeeding. In 1 infant, a very low level of NTZ was detected immediately after birth following exposure throughout pregnancy, which resolved despite continued breast milk exposure. Although the number of analyzed samples is very small, our findings seem to further refute the theory of a substantial transfer of MAbs from breast milk via FcRn, which is in line with recommendations of other societies (rheumatology and gastroenterology) who already consider breastfeeding under MAbs to be safe for the infant.1,2 Although more studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate the safety of the individual MAbs, safety will likely be comparable between them and transferable to neurology.

The overlap of MAb exposure during pregnancy and lactation in many infants of our cohort precludes definite conclusions about the safety of exposure through breast milk alone. In combination with the small sample size, this is a limitation of our study. Exposure to MAbs, especially during late pregnancy, could partly confound our results. It can be associated with hematologic abnormalities,16 and the infection risk for these neonates is largely unknown. Therefore, more information on MAb exposure, especially NTZ, during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy and subsequent follow-up of the infants is necessary. To disentangle the effect of late pregnancy exposure, larger cohorts are needed, with infants exclusively being exposed to MAbs during lactation.

Taken together with other studies, our results underscore the exceedingly low probability of harmful effects of MAbs solely through breast milk.13 Women with MS can be advised that although available data are few, these small data sets do not appear to show meaningful adverse effects for infants exposed to breast milk after MAb treatment of the mother. Infants exposed to MAbs during pregnancy should continue to be monitored carefully, and future studies with larger sample sizes should consider the duration of exposed breastfeeding and infants' age at the time of exposure.

Study funding

The German Multiple Sclerosis and Pregnancy Registry (DMSKW) is partly supported by the Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Teva Pharma, Novartis, and Merck. The funding organizations had no role in design and conduct of the registry; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclosure

Andrea I. Ciplea has received speaker honoraria from Bayer Healthcare and travel grants from Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and Novartis. A. Langer-Gould, A. de Vries, and T. Schaap report no disclosures. S. Thiel has received speaker honoraria from Bayer Healthcare. M. Ringelstein has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Bayer Vital GmbH, Roche, and Ipsen and travel reimbursement from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merz, Genzyme, Teva, Grifols, Roche, and Merck, none related to this study. R. Gold has received payments for consultancy from Biogen and Teva and speaker honoraria and research grants from Biogen Idec Germany, Teva, Sanofi Aventis, Novartis, Bayer Healthcare, and Merck Serono. K. Hellwig has received travel grants from Biogen, Novartis, and Merck and received speaker and research honoraria from Biogen Idec Germany, Teva, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Bayer Healthcare, Merck Serono, and Roche. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank all the participants of the DMSKW and the referring neurologists and MS nurses.

Appendix Authors

Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

  • Received January 24, 2020.
  • Accepted in final form March 19, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mahadevan U,
    2. Robinson C,
    3. Bernasko N, et al
    . Inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy clinical care pathway: a report from the American Gastroenterological Association IBD Parenthood Project Working Group. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1508–1524.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Puchner A,
    2. Grochenig HP,
    3. Sautner J, et al
    . Immunosuppressives and biologics during pregnancy and lactation: a consensus report issued by the Austrian Societies of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Rheumatology and Rehabilitation. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 2019;131:29–44.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Baker TE,
    2. Cooper SD,
    3. Kessler L,
    4. Hale TW
    . Transfer of natalizumab into breast milk in a mother with multiple sclerosis. J Hum Lact 2015;31:233–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Proschmann U,
    2. Thomas K,
    3. Thiel S,
    4. Hellwig K,
    5. Ziemssen T
    . Natalizumab during pregnancy and lactation. Mult Scler 2018;24:1627–1634.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Krysko KM,
    2. LaHue SC,
    3. Anderson A, et al
    . Minimal breast milk transfer of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody used in neurological conditions. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2020;7:e637. 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000637.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bragnes Y,
    2. Boshuizen R,
    3. de Vries A,
    4. Lexberg A,
    5. Ostensen M
    . Low level of Rituximab in human breast milk in a patient treated during lactation. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:1047–1048.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Victora CG,
    2. Bahl R,
    3. Barros AJ, et al
    . Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet (London) 2016;387:475–490.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hellwig K,
    2. Haghikia A,
    3. Gold R
    . Pregnancy and natalizumab: results of an observational study in 35 accidental pregnancies during natalizumab treatment. Mult Scler 2011;17:958–963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Neuhauser H,
    2. Schienkiewitz A,
    3. Schaffrath Rosario A,
    4. Dortschy R,
    5. BM K
    . Referenzperzentile für anthropometrische Maßzahlen und Blutdruck aus der Studie zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland (KiGGS). Vol. 2. 2013. Available at: erweiterte Auflage rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheitsberichterstattung/GBEDownloadsB/KiGGS_Referenzperzentile.html. Accessed January 13, 2020.
  10. 10.↵
    1. McDonald WI,
    2. Compston A,
    3. Edan G, et al
    . Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rispens T,
    2. Leeuwen A,
    3. Vennegoor A, et al
    . Measurement of serum levels of natalizumab, an immunoglobulin G4 therapeutic monoclonal antibody. Anal Biochem 2011;411:271–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Rispens T,
    2. Vennegoor A,
    3. Wolbink GJ,
    4. Polman CH,
    5. Killestein J
    . Natalizumab remains detectable in patients with multiple sclerosis long after treatment is stopped. Mult Scler 2012;18:899–901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Datta P,
    2. Baker T,
    3. Hale TW
    . Balancing the use of medications while maintaining breastfeeding. Clin perinatology 2019;46:367–382.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Greiner W,
    2. Batram M,
    3. Scholz S
    . Kinder- und Jugendreport 2018 Schleswig Holstein. 2018. Available at: dak.de/dak/download/report-2106236.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2020.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Greiner W,
    2. Batram M,
    3. Scholz S,
    4. Witte J
    . Kinder- und Jugendreport Nordrhein-Westfalen Gesundheitsversorgung von Kindern- und Jugendlichen in Nordrhein-Westfalen. 2019. Available at: dak.de/dak/download/download-kinder--und-jugendreport-2019-nordrhein-westfalen-2106266.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2020.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Haghikia A,
    2. Langer-Gould A,
    3. Rellensmann G, et al
    . Natalizumab use during the third trimester of pregnancy. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:891–895.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bergmann RL,
    2. Dudenhausen JW
    . Prädiktion und Prävention der Frühgeburt. Der Gynäkologe 2003;36:391–402.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ebrahimi N,
    2. Herbstritt S,
    3. Gold R,
    4. Amezcua L,
    5. Koren G,
    6. Hellwig K
    . Pregnancy and fetal outcomes following natalizumab exposure in pregnancy. A prospective, controlled observational study. Mult Scler 2015;21:198–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    EMA. Tysabri® (natalizumab)—EPAR Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/tysabri-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2020.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Matro R,
    2. Martin CF,
    3. Wolf D,
    4. Shah SA,
    5. Mahadevan U
    . Exposure concentrations of infants breastfed by women receiving biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases and effects of breastfeeding on infections and development. Gastroenterology 2018;155:696–704.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Newton ER,
    2. Hale TW
    . Drugs in breast milk. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015;58:868–884.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Foley JF,
    2. Goelz S,
    3. Hoyt T,
    4. Christensen A,
    5. Metzger RR
    . Evaluation of natalizumab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with standard and extended interval dosing. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019;31:65–71.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Giragossian C,
    2. Clark T,
    3. Piche-Nicholas N,
    4. Bowman CJ
    . Neonatal Fc receptor and its role in the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of immunoglobulin G-based biotherapeutics. Curr Drug Metab 2013;14:764–790.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Oreja-Guevara C,
    2. Wray S,
    3. Buffels R,
    4. Zecevic D,
    5. Vukusic S
    . Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Treated With Ocrelizumab. ECTRIMS Online Library; 2019.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Fritzsche J,
    2. Pilch A,
    3. Mury D,
    4. Schaefer C,
    5. Weber-Schoendorfer C
    . Infliximab and adalimumab use during breastfeeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012;46:718–719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Mariette X,
    2. Forger F,
    3. Abraham B, et al
    . Lack of placental transfer of certolizumab pegol during pregnancy: results from CRIB, a prospective, postmarketing, pharmacokinetic study. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:228–233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Julsgaard M,
    2. Christensen LA,
    3. Gibson PR, et al
    . Concentrations of adalimumab and infliximab in mothers and newborns, and effects on infection. Gastroenterology 2016;151:110–119.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.
    Deutsch-Schweizerische Versorgungsleitlinie basierend auf internationalen Empfehlungen (EACD-Consensus) zu Definition, Diagnose, Untersuchung und Behandlung bei Umschriebenen Entwicklungsstörungen motorischer Funktionen (UEMF). 2011. Available at: awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/II/022-017.html. Accessed January 13, 2020.

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Acknowledgment
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Cohort studies

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Views & Reviews
    Transfer of monoclonal antibodies into breastmilk in neurologic and non-neurologic diseases
    Sara C. LaHue, Annika Anderson, Kristen M. Krysko et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, May 27, 2020
  • Article
    Anti-CD20 therapies and pregnancy in neuroimmunologic disorders
    A cohort study from Germany
    Tania Kümpfel, Sandra Thiel, Ingrid Meinl et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, December 17, 2020
  • Article
    Minimal breast milk transfer of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody used in neurological conditions
    Kristen M. Krysko, Sara C. LaHue, Annika Anderson et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, November 12, 2019
  • Article
    Disease activity following pregnancy-related discontinuation of natalizumab in MS
    Iris Kleerekooper, Zoé L.E. van Kempen, Cyra E. Leurs et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, December 06, 2017
Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation: 10 (3)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Online ISSN: 2332-7812

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise