Share

July 2020; 7 (4) ArticleOpen Access

Single-cycle rituximab-induced immunologic changes in children

Enhanced in neuroimmunologic disease?

Angela Deyà-Martínez, Yadira Gordón, Cristina Molina-Anguita, Alexandru Vlagea, Monica Piquer, Manel Juan, Ana Esteve-Solé, Jordi Antón, Álvaro Madrid, Ana García-García, Ana M. Plaza, Thaís Armangue, Laia Alsina
First published May 6, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000724
Full PDF
Citation
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
488

Share

Abstract

Objective To investigate the immunologic impact of a single cycle of rituximab (RTX) in children and adolescents with immune-mediated disorders, we evaluated B cells and immunoglobulin levels of 20 patients with neuroimmunologic, nephrologic, dermatologic, and rheumatologic disorders treated under recommended guidelines.

Methods Retrospective study of immunologic changes in children (aged ≤18 years) diagnosed with immune-mediated disorders in which RTX was prescribed between June 2014 and February 2019. Patients were excluded if they had prior diagnosis of malignant disease or primary immunodeficiency. Patients were clinically and immunologically followed up every 3 months. Only patients having received a single cycle of RTX and with a follow-up greater than 12 months were included in the analysis of persistent dysgammaglobulinemia.

Results Twenty children were included. Median age at RTX treatment was 12.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6–15.5 years). Median follow-up was 12.6 months (IQR 10.2–24 months). Of the 14 patients eligible for persistent dysgammaglobulinemia analysis (3 had received RTX retreatment, 2 had <12 months post-RTX follow-up, and in 1 data for this time point was missing), 2/14 (14%) remained with complete B-cell depletion, and 5/14 (36%) had dysgammaglobulinemia. Patients with dysgammaglobulinemia were younger (7.8 vs 15.6 years, p = 0.072), had more underlying neuroimmunologic diseases (5/5 vs 0/9, p < 0.001), and had received more frequently concentrated doses of RTX (3/5 vs 1/9, p = 0.05) than patients without dysgammaglobulinemia. Kinetics of immunoglobulins in the 20 patients revealed a decrease as early as 3 months after RTX in patients with neuroimmunologic disorders.

Conclusion In our cohort, single-cycle RTX-induced dysgammaglobulinemia was enhanced in patients with neuroimmunologic diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm this observation.

Glossary

Ig=
immunoglobulin;
IRT=
immunoglobulin replacement therapy;
RTX=
rituximab

Rituximab (RTX), used as first-line or second-line treatment in many immune-mediated disorders, is a chimeric monoclonal antibody, which recognizes human CD20 expressed on B lymphocytes, leading to their destruction.1-3

It is well attested that B-cell depletion occurs within days after RTX, affecting from pro–B cells to plasmablasts. B-cell reconstitution to reach pretreatment levels, mostly studied in adult populations, ranges from 2 months to more than 2 years after RTX administration. The factors involved in this reconstitution remain unclear, but treatment duration, underlying disease, age, concomitant treatments, and previous immunologic status have been described as putative factors.3,4

Although long-lived plasma cells are not affected, a decrease in immunoglobulin levels is often observed after RTX treatment, predominantly affecting the immunoglobulin (Ig) M isotype. When this decrease is observed, most patients recover within 12 months following RTX administration.5,–,7 In some patients, severe hypogammaglobulinemia of IgG isotype occurs, requiring immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT).4

Despite the benefit of RTX in certain immune-mediated disorders, there are concerns regarding the risk of associated secondary immunodeficiency, which is frequently amplified in this population by the use of other concomitant immunosuppressant therapies.8 This is of special interest in children, who are more exposed to infections and have an immune system in development.9

To increase our understanding of the immunologic changes and infectious risk related to RTX use in nononcologic diseases, we analyzed the effects of a single cycle of RTX for the treatment of immune-mediated disorders in a pediatric population.

Methods

Retrospective study of immunologic reconstitution between June 2014 and February 2019 under clinical practice conditions, including patients aged ≤18 years, diagnosed with an immune-mediated disorder (nonmalignant diseases) comprising neuroimmunologic, nephrologic, dermatologic, and rheumatologic diseases, and treated with 1 induction cycle of RTX in accordance with the recommended guidelines or in-house protocols for each disease.10,–,12 All patients were followed at the Clinical Immunology Unit, in which a specific post-RTX immune reconstitution monitoring protocol has been developed that includes a clinical and analytical control every 3 months until full stable B-cell and immunoglobulin recovery is achieved (table 1). Patients having received a single cycle of RTX and with a follow-up greater than 12 months after RTX were included in the analysis of persistent dysgammaglobulinemia. The decision to choose the 12-month time point was based on previous publications showing that when dysgammaglobulinemia is observed after RTX, most patients recover within 12 months.5,–,7 Because only single-cycle RTX immunologic impact was analyzed, once a patient received a second cycle of RTX, they were excluded for subsequent analysis. Patients with a previous diagnosis of malignant disease or primary immunodeficiency were excluded. The study has been reviewed and approved for its publication by the ethics committee of our institution.

View this table:
Table 1

Protocol for immunologic follow-up of patients treated with RTX in our center

We obtained patient information (sex, age at RTX infusion, ethnicity, consanguinity and family history, RTX dosage, concomitant immunosuppression, and infections) from clinical charts or interviews during follow-up visits. For the analysis, RTX dosage was categorized as concentrated regimen (1–2 doses at 500–750 mg/m2 separated by 2 weeks) vs nonconcentrated regimen (4 weekly doses at 375 mg/m2). Laboratory data analysis included complete blood count; immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA [ARCHITECT c Systems and AEROSET System. Immunoturbidimetric measure]); percentage of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, and B-cell immunophenotyping (naive [CD19+IgM+/IgD+]; memory [CD19+CD27+IgD+], switched memory [CD19+CD27+IgD−], and plasmablasts [CD19+IgM−CD38++]) (flow cytometry using BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA, FACS Canto II, normal range for age obtained from Schatorjé et al.13). Dysgammaglobulinemia was defined as a decrease of 2 SDs below age reference values of at least 1 immunoglobulin isotype (IgG and/or IgM and/or IgA).14

Statistical analysis

Categorical and continuous variables were described as percentages and median values and IQR (p25-p75). We applied the Fisher exact test or Mann-Whitney U test for the comparative analysis of baseline characteristics and at 12 months post-RTX as appropriate for the data set. We used Pearson and Spearman tests to identify correlations between quantitative variables. The analysis was performed using SPSS version 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

We recruited a total of 20 patients comprising neuroimmunologic, nephrologic, dermatologic, and rheumatologic diseases (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A242). Median age at first RTX was 12.8 (IQR 6.6–15.5) years. Of note, 8/20 patients received the concentrated RTX regimen and 12/20 the 4-weekly regimen according to the recommendations for each disease.10,–,12 All patients had received immunosuppressants previously and/or concomitant with RTX (9/20 [45%] steroids alone; 11/20 [55%] steroids and second-line immunosuppressants) (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A242).

All but 1 patient with underlying nephrotic syndrome (P17, figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A240) had normal IgG levels before RTX. Two patients had low baseline levels of B-cell percent, and 2 patients showed low baseline switched memory B cells (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A242, and table e-2, links.lww.com/NXI/A243).

The presence of dysgammaglobulinemia was analyzed 12 months after RTX.. After excluding 6 patients (3 because of additional RTX cycles before 12 months, 2 because they had not reached 12 months of follow-up, and in one data was missing for this timepoint), 14 patients remained on follow-up at 12 months after receiving RTX (figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A240). Regarding B cells, 2/14 patients (14.3%, P6 and P12) remained with complete B-cell depletion, and 9/14 (64.3%) had not reached normal percentage of B cells (table e-2, links.lww.com/NXI/A243). B-cell subphenotype showed normal or high per age range values of naive B-cell levels in all patients, while 3/9 patients had low levels of B memory cells and 6/9 had normal levels (table e-2, links.lww.com/NXI/A243). Of the 6 patients on follow-up 24 months post-RTX, because they had not previously reached fully immune recovery and were not RTX-retreated, 3/6 remained with low levels of B cells.

Regarding immunoglobulin levels, 5/14 (36%) had some degree of persistent dysgammaglobulinemia (isolated hypo-IgG (1), isolated hypo-IgA (1), hypo-IgG and A (1), hypo-IgG and IgM (1), and hypo-IgA and M (1)), affecting IgG concentrations in 3. At 24 months post-RTX, 2/6 persisted with dysgammaglobulinemia.

Comparative analysis between patients with and without dysgammaglobulinemia 12 months after RTX

View this table:
Table 2

Comparison between patients with and without dysgammaglobulinemia 12 months after a single cycle of RTX

We observed differences in demographics and underlying disease in patients with or without dysgammaglobulinemia (table 2): the 5 patients with dysgammaglobulinemia showed a tendency toward being younger at the time of RTX treatment (7.8 years vs 15.6; p = 0.072), all had underlying neuroimmunologic diseases (5/5 vs 0/9 patients; p < 0.001), and they had received more frequently the concentrated RTX regimen (3/5 vs 1/9; p = 0.05) in comparison with patients without dysgammaglobulinemia. No increased use of previous or concomitant immunosuppressants was observed in the group with dysgammaglobulinemia. Indeed, most patients with underlying neuroimmunologic conditions, which more frequently developed dysgammaglobulinemia, received steroids alone (only 1 patient combined with cyclophosphamide) before RTX (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A242, and table 2).

No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups regarding baseline IgG, IgM, and IgA levels (IgG p = 0.178, IgM p = 0.966, IgA p 0.299). The percentage of basal B cells was lower in patients with neuroimmunologic disease (10%) in contrast to non-neuroimmunologic disease (31%) (p = 0.01, figure e-2, links.lww.com/NXI/A241), but the levels were not pathologic in any of the groups, and no differences in B-cell subphenotype were observed (table 2).

To gain insight in the characteristics of the dysgammaglobulinemia, we evaluated the kinetics on its evolution. Figure 1 represents the kinetics of instauration of dysgammaglobulinemia in the 20 patients included in the cohort. Three months after RTX treatment, patients with underlying neuroimmunologic disorders already showed a tendency toward lower levels of immunoglobulins (IgG p = 0.267, IgM p = 0.087, IgA p 0.075), which at 6 (IgG p = 0.036, IgM p = 0.011, IgA p 0.015) and 12 months (IgG p = 0.048, IgM p = 0.046, IgA p 0.029) was statistically significant. At 24 months, 4 patients persisted with some degree of decreased B-cell numbers and/or dysgammaglobulinemia, of which 3 had an underlying neuroimmunologic disease.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Post-RTX evolution of immunoglobulin levels ((A) IgG, (B) IgM, and (C) IgA) in pediatric patients with neuroimmunologic vs non-neuroimmunologic diseases (IgG levels are expressed using normalized levels according to normal age ranges)

One patient with baseline hypo IgG due nephrotic syndrome (P17) was not included for the IgG kinetics analysis. Ig = immunoglobulin; RTX = rituximab.

Despite 5 patients developed dysgammaglobulinemia, only 1 patient (P6 who previously received cyclophosphamide) required IRT because of a severe hypogammaglobulinemia due to a prolonged B-cell aplasia after a first cycle of RTX. An additional patient (P3) required IRT after retreatment with RTX because of severe hypogammaglobulinemia and bacterial pneumonia. No other relevant infections were reported in the remaining patients.

Discussion

This study describes the demographic characteristics, immunologic changes, and clinical outcomes of 20 children with acquired immune-mediated disorders after a single cycle of RTX. The results of our analysis provide insights regarding the apparent good tolerance to RTX in pediatric patients with immune-mediated disorders, except for a possible enhanced susceptibility to dysgammaglobulinemia in neuroimmunologic diseases.

In adults receiving RTX for nononcologic diseases, complete B-cell count recovery usually occurs at 2–6 months.5,6 In the context of malignancy, the recovery takes place 1–2 years afterward or later.5,–,7 There is a lack of systematic immunologic follow-up of pediatric patients receiving RTX, but recent studies reveal that in nononcologic conditions, recovery of B cells occurs later than in adults at 6–12 months.15,16 This timing is consistent with our observations. Complete B-cell depletion at 12 months post-RTX can be seen in up to 10% of patients.17 In our cohort, at 12 months post-RTX, 64.3% of patients had not yet reached full B-cell reconstitution, higher than expected, and 2/14 remained with complete B-cell depletion (table e-2, links.lww.com/NXI/A243).

There are a few published reports regarding B-cell subphenotype in RTX-treated patients. It has been reported that patients with previously decreased switched memory B cells may be at a greater risk of developing abnormalities and hypogammaglobulinemia.4 In our cohort, 2 patients showed low baseline levels of switched memory B cells, but only one of them developed dysgammaglobulinemia. On B-cell reconstitution, naive phenotype predominated, as expected, but interestingly, 12 months post-RTX, 6 patients already showed normal levels of memory B cells. No differences in the B-cell subphenotype on B-cell reconstitution were observed between patients who developed dysgammaglobulinemia and those who did not.

In terms of impaired antibody production, some factors have been associated such as certain underlying diseases, previous hypogammaglobulinemia,18 and concomitant chemotherapy, whereas others remain unknown.1,4,19 In our cohort, all patients (except 1 with nephrotic syndrome) had previous normal levels of immunoglobulins. In the majority of published studies conducted in adults with nononcologic diseases receiving RTX, the proportion of low IgM seems to be greater than the prevalence of low IgG.1 The data available on immunoglobulin levels after RTX in children with nonmalignant disease are nonhomogeneous.1 Although some report patients with immunoglobulins in the low level of normal range, others report mild hypogammaglobulinemia1; still, it seems that a major impact on IgM levels is observed as well.1,20,–,22

Persistent dysgammaglobulinemia 12 months after RTX is less commonly observed.1 In our cohort, 12 months after RTX, 5/14 (36%) patients presented dysgammaglobulinemia (3/5 including hypo-IgG), despite complete recovery of B-cell count in 3 of them. Surprisingly, all patients with persistent dysgammaglobulinemia at 12 months had underlying neuroimmunologic diseases, and in 4/5, immunoglobulin level alterations had already appeared 3 months after RTX. This fast-established alteration is rarely reported23 and is even more significant if we consider that in 2/4 patients, these alterations persisted after 24 months. An important immunologic impact of RTX in neuroimmunologic patients (children and adults) has recently been reported,24,25 although many re-treated patients were included in the analysis, making the results not comparable to ours.

The observed selective occurrence of cases of persistent dysgammaglobulinemia among neuroimmunologic patients was unexpected. Factors that have been associated with higher risk of dysgammaglobulinemia and which might explain the enhanced humoral impact in these diseases in comparison with other immune-mediated diseases included are age at the time of RTX, more concentrated doses of RTX, concomitant immunosuppressants, and/or a possible previously undetected underlying immune disorder.

Regarding age at RTX treatment, patients with neuroimmunologic disorders were younger than the other group. This susceptibility associated with age has recently been reported in a similar pediatric cohort in patients with neuroimmunologic diseases.17 In fact, our post-RTX protocol based on published recommendations (table 1) indicates IRT in patients receiving RTX less than 2 years old due to the associated infectious risk ascribed to their reduced immune repertoire.26 Nevertheless, RTX was also administered in very young patients in the group of non-neurologic disorders, without consequences. Thus, age might only partially explain this observation.

Regarding RTX dose, 3/5 patients with neuroimmunologic disorders more frequently received the concentrated RTX regimen compared with the rest of the cohort. Although the cumulative dose is lower with this regimen (1000 vs 1500 mg/m2), the intensity is higher. The recommendations for the use of higher doses of RTX in neuroimmunologic disorders are based on recent publications showing better clinical results compared with the less intense regimen.12 These good results are attributed to higher extravascular B-cell depletion27 and to increased CNS concentrations.12 Higher doses of RTX can induce another mechanism of B-cell depletion, causing a more prominent plasma cell destruction, which could explain this early immunoglobulin impairment. This phenomenon is called shaving. During shaving, RTX-CD20 complexes removed from B-cell surface are released through circulation, arriving at the bone marrow, where they link with FcyRIIIB-expressing plasma cells, leading to their apoptosis.28 Although this phenomenon may contribute to the observed early-onset dysgammaglobulinemia, it still does not explain the full picture because only 3/5 patients with neuroimmunologic diseases received the concentrated RTX regimen.

Regarding the role of concomitant immunosuppressant treatment, in our cohort, all patients had previously received several lines of immunosuppressants. Indeed, 1 of the 2 patients with permanent complete B depletion (0%–1% B cell) had previously received cyclophosphamide, but 2 other patients of the cohort with non-neuroimmunologic diseases also received cyclophosphamide with no dysgammaglobulinemia. Curiously, patients with neuroimmunologic disorders had received fewer previous or concomitant immunosuppressants (table 2). In the literature, the results of the different published studies often display contradictory conclusions.29,30 Some correlate the use of cyclophosphamide and purine analogs31 or high doses of steroids with the development of hypogammaglobulinemia; however, mixed treatments used in clinical practice hamper the analysis of the specific impact of each drug on the immune system.

Finally, another hypothesis is the underlying disease itself because all patients with neuroimmunologic diseases developed dysgammaglobulinemia, irrespective of the regimen dose or age. It is difficult to elucidate the role of disease because the few published information on the immunologic impact of RTX in neuroimmunologic disorders has been obtained from adult cohorts in which RTX retreatment (monthly or every 6 months depending on the regimen and patient) represents the current management.23 Under these conditions, 30% of patients have been described to develop hypogammaglobulinemia at some stage during RTX therapy.23

In our cohort, we did not observe B-cell subphenotype differences at baseline or after RTX, and different neuroimmunologic diseases were included, with different mechanisms of pathogenesis (3/5 patients with recurrent anti–myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–associated central nervous inflammatory disease and 2/5 with anti–NMDA receptor encephalitis), making it difficult to reinforce this hypothesis. Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out that an unidentified intrinsic B-cell defect underlies these diseases, which might then be magnified by the use of high doses of RTX.

The sample size is a limitation of the study, and observations need to be replicated in larger studies. Nevertheless, the kinetics of the dysgammaglobulinemia in the subgroup of patients with neuroimmunologic disorders are consistent among the patients. Also, patients included in this study reflect common clinical practice.

In conclusion, we have analyzed single-cycle RTX-induced humoral alterations in a cohort of pediatric patients with immune-related disorders. We have observed more frequent alterations than expected compared with previously published results, in particular in patients with neuroimmunologic diseases. Still, the increase in infectious risk is low. Patients with neuroimmunologic diseases show a particular pattern of dysgammaglobulinemia with early onset. This finding might be ascribed to a combination of the underlying disease, younger age, and/or higher concentration of RTX dose. These observations are of special interest because retreatment with RTX is becoming current practice in many of these diseases, which may increase the number of patients that develop dysgammaglobulinemia.10,–,12 Further studies are needed to confirm these observations and to explore the underlying immunologic mechanisms involved.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the “Biobanc de l’Hospital Infantil Sant Joan de Déu per a la Investigació” integrated in the Spanish Biobank Network of ISCIII for the sample and data procurement.

Study funding

This study was supported by the projects PI15/01094, PFIS0200 (AC16/00025), PI18/00223, and FI19/00208 to LA, and PI18/00486 to TA, integrated in the Plan Nacional de I + D + I and cofinanced by the ISCIII—Subdirección General de Evaluación y Formento de la Investigación Sanitaria—and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), through the Pla estratègic de recerca i innovació en salut (PERIS), Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT006/17/00199 to LA and SLT006/17/00362 to TA), Mutua Madrileña Foundation (AP162572016 to TA), 2017 Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators, BBVA Foundation and a 2017 Beca de Investigación de la Sociedad Española De Inmunología Clínica Alergología y Asma Pediatrica to LA, and Torrons Vicens Foundation grant (PFNR0144) to LA and TA.

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Appendix Authors

Table
Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the project PI15/01094 integrated in the Plan Nacional de I + D + I and cofinanced by the ISCIII—Subdirección General de Evaluación y Formento de la Investigación Sanitaria—and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).

  • Received December 20, 2019.
  • Accepted in final form March 17, 2020.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Worch J,
    2. Makarova O,
    3. Burkhardt B
    . Immunreconstitution and infectious complications after rituximab treatment in children and adolescents: what do we know and what can we learn from adults? Cancers (Basel) 2015;7:305–328.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    1. Okroj M,
    2. Österborg A
    , Blom AM. Effector mechanisms of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in B cell malignancies. Cancer Treat Rev 2013;39:632–639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kavcic M,
    2. Fisher BT,
    3. Seif AE, et al
    . Leveraging administrative data to monitor rituximab use in 2875 patients at 42 freestanding children's hospitals across the United States. J Pediatr 2013;162:1252.e1–1258 e1.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sacco KA,
    2. Abraham RS
    . Consequences of B-cell-depleting therapy: hypogammaglobulinemia and impaired B-cell reconstitution. Immunotherapy 2018;10:713–728.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Christou EAA,
    2. Giardino G,
    3. Worth A,
    4. Ladomenou F
    . Risk factors predisposing to the development of hypogammaglobulinemia and infections post-rituximab. Int Rev Immunol 2017;36:352–359.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kimby E
    . Tolerability and safety of rituximab. Cancer Treat Rev 2005;31:456–473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kado R,
    2. Sanders G,
    3. McCune WJ
    . Suppression of normal immune responses after treatment with rituximab. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2016;28:251–258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Memon AB,
    2. Javed A,
    3. Caon C, et al
    . Long-term safety of rituximab induced peripheral B-cell depletion in autoimmune neurological diseases. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190425.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kollmann TR
    . Development of immunity in early life. J Infect 2015;(suppl 1):S112–S120.
  10. 10.↵
    KDIGO (kidney diseases improving global outcome) 2012. Clinical practice guidelines for glomerulonephritis
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kearsley-Fleet L,
    2. Sampath S,
    3. McCann LJ, et al
    . Use and effectiveness of rituximab in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritisin a cohort study in the United Kingdom. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58:331–335.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Stingl C,
    2. Cardinale K,
    3. Van Mater H
    . An update on the treatment of pediatric autoinmune encephalitis. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol 2018;4:14–28.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Schatorjé EJ,
    2. Gemen EF,
    3. Driessen GJ, et al
    . Age-matched reference values for B-lymphocyte subpopulations and CVID classifications in children. Scand J Immunol 2011;74:502–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Soldin SJ
    . Pediatric Reference Ranges, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AACC. Press; 1997.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rao A,
    2. Kelly M,
    3. Musselman M, et al
    . Safety, efficacy, and immune reconstitution after rituximab therapy in pediatric patients with chronic refractory hematologic autoimmune cytopenias. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;50:822–825.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Quartier P,
    2. Brethon B,
    3. Philippet P,
    4. Landman-Parker J,
    5. Le Deist F,
    6. Fischer A
    . Treatment of childhood autoimmune haemolytic anaemia with rituximab. Lancet 2001;358:1511–1513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dale RC,
    2. Brilot F,
    3. Duffy LV, et al
    . Utility and safety of rituximab in pediatric autoimmune and inflammatory CNS disease. Neurology 2014;83:142–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Barmettler S,
    2. Ong MS,
    3. Farmer JR,
    4. Choi H,
    5. Walter J
    . Association of immunoglobulin levels, infectious risk and mortality with rituximab and hypogammaglobulinemia. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1:e184169.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Roberts DM,
    2. Jones RB,
    3. Smith RM, et al
    . Rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia: incidence, predictors and outcomes in patients with multi-system autoimmune disease. J Autoimmun 2015;57:60–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kamei K,
    2. Ito S,
    3. Nozu K, et al
    . Single dose of rituximab for refractory steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:1321–1328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zarkhin V,
    2. Li L,
    3. Kambham N,
    4. Sigdel T,
    5. Salvatierra O,
    6. Sarwal MM
    . A randomized, prospective trial of rituximab for acute rejection in pediatric renal transplantation. Am J Transpl 2008;8:2607–2617.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bennett CM,
    2. Rogers ZR,
    3. Kinnamon DD, et al
    . Prospective phase 1/2 study of rituximab in childhood and adolescent chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 2006;107:2639–2642.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Reddy V,
    2. Martinez L,
    3. Isenberg DA,
    4. Leandro MJ,
    5. Cambridge G
    . Pragmatic treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with rituximab: long-term effects on serum immunoglobulins. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:857–866.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tallantyre EC,
    2. Whittam DH,
    3. Jolles S, et al
    . Correction to: secondary antibody deficiency: a complication of anti-CD20 therapy for neuroinflammation. J Neurol 2018, 265;1123
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Khojan AM,
    2. Miller ML,
    3. Klein-Gitelman MS, et al
    . Rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia in pediatric patients with autoimmune diseases. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2019;17:61.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Looney RJ,
    2. Srinivasan R,
    3. Calabrese LH
    . The effects of rituximab on immunocompetency in patients with autoinmune disease. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:5–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Leandro MJ
    . B-cell subpopulations in humans and their differential susceptibility to depletion with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15(suppl 1):S3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Beum PV,
    2. Kennedy AD,
    3. Williams ME,
    4. Lindorfer MA,
    5. Taylor RP
    . The shaving reaction: rituximab/CD20 complexes are removed from mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by TPH-1 monocytes. J Immunol 2006;176:2600–2609.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Marco H,
    2. Smith RM,
    3. Jones RB, et al
    . The effect of rituximab therapy on immunoglobulin levels in patients with multisystem autoimmune disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Venhoff N,
    2. Effelsberg NM,
    3. Salzer U, et al
    . Impact of rituximab on immunoglobulin concentrations and B cell numbers after cyclophosphamide treatment in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitides. PLoS One 2012;7:e37626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Patel SY,
    2. Carbone J,
    3. Jolles S
    . The expanding field of secondary antibody deficiency: causes, diagnosis, and management. Front Inmunol 2019;8:33.
    OpenUrl

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

Alert Me

Advertisement