Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub

Share

November 2020; 7 (6) ArticleOpen Access

Lymphocyte recovery after fingolimod discontinuation in patients with MS

Sara Nagy, Jens Kuhle, Tobias Derfuss
First published August 14, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000874
Sara Nagy
From the Department of Neurology (S.N., J.K., T.D.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel; Division of Developmental- and Neuropaediatrics (S.N.), University Children's Hospital of Basel (UKBB), University of Basel; and Department of Biomedicine (J.K., T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Kuhle
From the Department of Neurology (S.N., J.K., T.D.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel; Division of Developmental- and Neuropaediatrics (S.N.), University Children's Hospital of Basel (UKBB), University of Basel; and Department of Biomedicine (J.K., T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Derfuss
From the Department of Neurology (S.N., J.K., T.D.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel; Division of Developmental- and Neuropaediatrics (S.N.), University Children's Hospital of Basel (UKBB), University of Basel; and Department of Biomedicine (J.K., T.D.), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Lymphocyte recovery after fingolimod discontinuation in patients with MS
Sara Nagy, Jens Kuhle, Tobias Derfuss
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Nov 2020, 7 (6) e874; DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000874

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
778

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective To investigate the dynamics of immune cells recovery after treatment discontinuation of fingolimod in real-life clinical practice, we analyzed the course of lymphocyte reconstitution and its potential influencing factors in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods We analyzed leukocyte, lymphocyte, and granulocyte counts of 58 patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after fingolimod cessation and the following parameters as potential risk factors for a prolonged lymphopenia up to 12 months: age; sex; Expanded Disability Status Scale, and disease duration at the time of fingolimod start; type and number of previous immunomodulatory treatments; fingolimod treatment duration; lymphocyte count at baseline before fingolimod, at fingolimod stop, and at the time of therapy switch; time interval between fingolimod cessation and new treatment initiation; type of the follow-up immunomodulatory treatment; and corticosteroid administration after fingolimod cessation.

Results All patients showed a drop of the lymphocyte count under fingolimod with no relevant leukopenia or neutropenia. One year after discontinuation, still 22% of the patients were lymphopenic and 54% of them did not reach 80% of the baseline lymphocyte value. Low lymphocyte counts before fingolimod start, under fingolimod, and at therapy switch, successive treatment with rituximab, and pretreatment with mitoxantrone were significantly associated with a prolonged immune cell recovery.

Conclusions Prolonged lymphopenia after fingolimod cessation exists in a subgroup of patients with MS and should be considered in clinical practice, particularly when changing treatment regimens.

Glossary

EDSS=
Expanded Disability Status Scale

Fingolimod, a functional antagonist of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor, effectively reduces long-term clinical and subclinical disease activity of MS by preventing the egression of lymphocytes from lymph nodes, resulting in a reduced lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood.1,2

Despite its efficacy and good tolerability, fingolimod is discontinued by 29% of patients after 2 years treatment duration.3 Most of these patients require a subsequent disease-modifying treatment; however, the treatment-free period must be defined on an individual basis. Disease reactivation and rebound are potential risks in patients stopping fingolimod4; therefore, a long treatment break should be avoided. On the other hand, a rapid therapy switch without considering lymphocyte recovery could be associated with an increased risk of infections. Hence, knowledge of the lymphocyte recovery time and factors influencing it play a crucial role in the management of patients with MS who stop fingolimod. In clinical studies, lymphocyte count has been described to recover to 80% of baseline value by 3 months2; however, less is known about the duration of lymphopenia in real-life clinical practice. We aimed to analyze the course of lymphocyte recovery and potential influencing factors in the first year after fingolimod discontinuation in patients with MS.

Methods

Data of all patients with MS (n = 58) who stopped fingolimod treatment and participated in the Swiss MS Cohort-Study5 in our center were analyzed retrospectively. Only patients receiving fingolimod for at least 1 month and having available blood tests within 1 year after fingolimod cessation were included. Leukocyte, lymphocyte, and granulocyte counts were analyzed at 3, 6, and 12 months after fingolimod cessation. Lymphopenia was defined as ≤0.9 × 109/L, leukopenia as ≤3.5 × 109/L, and neutropenia as ≤1.3 × 109/L. Lymphopenia was further divided into 3 groups: grade 1 (0.8–0.899 × 109/L), grade 2 (0.5–0.799 × 109/L), and grade 3 (<0.5 × 109/L). The following parameters were analyzed for their relation to prolonged lymphopenia: age, sex, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and disease duration of the patients at the time of fingolimod start; type and number of previous immunomodulatory regimens; fingolimod treatment duration; time interval between fingolimod cessation and new treatment initiation (in case of therapy switch); lymphocyte count before fingolimod, at fingolimod stop, and at the start of a subsequent treatment; the type of follow-up immunomodulatory treatment after fingolimod cessation; and corticosteroid administration because of relapses after therapy switch.

The association between potential risk factors and lymphocyte count at 12 months was assessed using a simple linear model. Thereafter, significant predictors were adjusted for other covariates in a multiple univariate model because of the small patient number.

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

All patients signed an informed consent and agreed to an anonymous data analysis. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (ID: 2019-02014).

Data availability

Anonymous data will be shared upon request from any qualified investigator.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Fifty-six patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 2 with primary progressive MS were included (Supplemental figure 1, links.lww.com/NXI/A305). Treatment discontinuation reasons included adverse events (n = 17, 29.3%), disease activity (n = 15, 25.9%), secondary progression (n = 12, 20.7%), pregnancy wish/confirmed pregnancy (n = 8, 13.8%), patient's decision (n = 4, 6.9%), newly diagnosed rheumatologic disease (n = 1, 1.7%), and unknown reason (n = 1, 1.7%). Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of the study population.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of all patients and of patients with normalized lymphocytes and prolonged lymphopenia 1 year after discontinuation of fingolimod

Most patients continued with an immunomodulatory treatment after fingolimod stop (figure 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 Follow-up treatment regimens of patients within the first year after discontinuation of fingolimod

From all patients who stopped fingolimod, 13 received no further treatment, 6 restarted fingolimod, whereas the remaining patients were switched at least once to another disease-modifying treatment within the first year (A). Eleven patients remained lymphopenic even 12 months after fingolimod cessation, from whom 8 received rituximab as the follow-up treatment (B). Injectables: interferon beta-1a, interferon beta 1-b, or glatiramer acetate.

Lymphocyte counts after fingolimod discontinuation

Prefingolimod lymphocyte count (median 28 days [0–152] before fingolimod start) was available in 53 patients. Three of these patients had lymphopenia (each with grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3, respectively): 2 of them were on interferon beta-1b treatment, whereas 1 patient had received mitoxantrone until 4 years before sampling. Five patients on natalizumab showed lymphocyte counts above the upper limit of normal (>3.3 × 109/L).

To evaluate the grade of lymphopenia under fingolimod, the last available lymphocyte count before therapy cessation was used. We analyzed lymphocyte, leukocyte, and granulocyte counts at the time point of switching to a follow-up treatment (median 1 day [0–80]), and 3 (median 81 days [28–145]), 6 (median 185 days [112–272]), and 12 months (median 369 days [250–477]) after therapy cessation. Lymphopenia because of an immunomodulatory regimen with expected reduction of lymphocyte count <0.5 × 109/L (fingolimod and alemtuzumab) was not included in the analysis. With these criteria, blood tests of 56 patients at fingolimod stop, 29 at therapy switch, 47 for the 3 months, 46 for the 6 months, and 49 patients for the 12 months time point were analyzed.

Fingolimod resulted in a drop of lymphocyte count by 76% compared with pretreatment; however, no leukopenia or neutropenia was detected. Twelve months after fingolimod stop, lymphocyte counts were normalized in 77.6% of the patients and did not reach 80% of the baseline value in 54% (after excluding those with baseline lymphocyte counts >3.3 × 109/L because of preceding natalizumab) (figure 2, A). One year after fingolimod cessation, 11 patients were still lymphopenic (22%) (figure 2, B). Prolonged lymphopenia was mostly grade 2 (Supplemental figure 2, links.lww.com/NXI/A306).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2 Lymphocyte recovery after discontinuation of fingolimod

Mean lymphocyte counts (× 109/L) are represented at baseline (black), fingolimod stop (dark gray), and at 3 (light gray), 6 (dark blue), and 12 months (light blue) after fingolimod discontinuation in the total study population (A) and in the patient group with prolonged lymphopenia (B). Corresponding tables represent mean lymphocyte counts (× 109/L), 95% confidence intervals in [] and patient numbers (n). Red dotted lines represent lower limit of lymphocytes (0.9 × 109/L). Significance level **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001.

Main characteristics of patients with prolonged lymphopenia

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 11 patients with prolonged lymphopenia compared with patients with normalized lymphocyte counts. Lymphocyte count before fingolimod start, at fingolimod stop, pretreatment with mitoxantrone, and a following anti CD-20 depleting therapy were associated with prolonged lymphopenia. The association of rituximab and prolonged lymphopenia persisted when adjusting for covariates (table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Association between prolonged lymphopenia and predefined predictors

Glucocorticoid treatment within 1 year after fingolimod cessation showed no association with prolonged lymphopenia. One patient in the lymphopenic group had sepsis because of an infected toe within 1 year after fingolimod stop without any further infections in this patient group.

Characteristics of patients with subsequent rituximab treatment

Eight of 17 patients (47%) who were switched to rituximab showed prolonged lymphopenia. Those patients who stayed lymphopenic on rituximab had a lower EDSS score at the fingolimod start (median 2.5 vs 4.0), and a lower lymphocyte count at baseline (median 1.3 vs 1.7 × 109/L) and at therapy switch (median 0.62 vs 1.02 × 109/L) compared with those without prolonged lymphopenia under rituximab. All patients pretreated with mitoxantrone belonged to the lymphopenic group.

Discussion

Under standardized conditions of clinical trials, prolonged lymphocyte recovery after fingolimod cessation was considered as an exception.3 However, peripheral lymphocyte reconstitution might be prolonged after therapy withdrawal despite preserved lymph node architecture.6,7 Our real-life analysis shows that lymphocytes recover in most patients without—in average—further increase from the levels attained at 3 months postcessation. However, fingolimod-induced lymphopenia persists in 22% of patients for at least up to 1 year after fingolimod stop. Limitations of our analysis are the low patient number and the lack of a standardized follow-up.

Patients with lower lymphocyte counts before fingolimod, under treatment, and at therapy switch, pretreated with mitoxantrone, and on rituximab follow-up treatment seem to be at a higher risk for prolonged lymphopenia. Because rituximab primarily affects B cells and B cells constitute only a minor percentage of lymphocytes, it is conceivable that a prolonged lymphopenia is at least partly caused by the pretreatment with fingolimod.

The described characteristics may have not shown up in clinical trials because patients were treated for a shorter period, previous mitoxantrone treatment was an exclusion criterion, and the effect of a follow-up treatment was not analyzed. It is therefore of utmost importance to evaluate the safety and pharmacodynamics of fingolimod in the context of the treatment history and the future treatments of the patient.

Study funding

No targeted funding reported.

Disclosure

S. Nagy and J. Kuhle have no disclosures related to the manuscript. T. Derfuss serves on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Merck, Biogen, Genzyme, GeNeuro, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Roche, and Celgene; has received funding for travel and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck, and Roche; and received research support from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, the European Union, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Swiss MS Society. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge support for the statistical analysis from Sabine Schädelin, MSc, from the Clinical Trial Unit, University of Basel.

Appendix Authors

Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

  • Received July 10, 2019.
  • Accepted in final form July 15, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cohen JA,
    2. Khatri B,
    3. Barkhof F, et al
    ; TRANSFORMS (Trial Assessing injectable interferoN vS. FTY720 Oral in RRMS) Study Group. Long-term (up to 4.5 years) treatment with fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: results from the extension of the randomised TRANSFORMS study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:468–475.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Francis G,
    2. Kappos L,
    3. O'Connor P, et al
    . Temporal profile of lymphocyte counts and relationship with infections with fingolimod therapy. Mult Scler J 2014;20:471–480.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Duquette P,
    2. Yeung M,
    3. Mouallif S,
    4. Nakhaipour HR,
    5. Haddad P,
    6. Schecter R
    . A retrospective claims analysis: compliance and discontinuation rates among Canadian patients with multiple sclerosis treated with disease-modifying therapies. PLoS One 2019;14:e0210417.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hatcher SE,
    2. Waubant E,
    3. Nourbakhsh B,
    4. Crabtree-Hartman E,
    5. Graves JS
    . Rebound syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis after cessation of fingolimod treatment. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:790–794.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Disanto G,
    2. Benkert P,
    3. Lorscheider J, et al
    ; SMSC Scientific Board. The Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort-Study (SMSC): a prospective Swiss wide investigation of key phases in disease evolution and new treatment options. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152347.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Johnson TA,
    2. Shames I,
    3. Keezer M, et al
    . Reconstitution of circulating lymphocyte counts in FTY720-treated MS patients. Clin Immunol 2010;137:15–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ghadiri M,
    2. Fitz-Gerald L,
    3. Rezk A, et al
    . Reconstitution of the peripheral immune repertoire following withdrawal of fingolimod. Mult Scler 2017;23:1225–1232.
    OpenUrl

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Acknowledgment
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Demyelinating disease (CNS)
  • All Clinical Neurology
  • Multiple sclerosis

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Advertisement
Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation: 9 (5)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology: Education
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Online ISSN: 2332-7812

© 2022 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise