Share

January 2021; 8 (1) ArticleOpen Access

Eastern equine encephalitis and use of IV immunoglobulin therapy and high-dose steroids

Douglas R. Wilcox, Sarah I. Collens, Isaac H. Solomon, Farrah J. Mateen, Shibani S. Mukerji
First published November 10, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000917
Full PDF
Citation
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
365

Share

Abstract

Objective To determine the clinical presentation and patient outcomes after treatment with IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), high-dose steroids, or standard of care alone in Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE), a mosquito-borne viral infection with significant neurologic morbidity and mortality.

Methods A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to 2 tertiary academic medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts, with EEE from 2005 to 2019.

Results Of 17 patients (median [IQR] age, 63 [36–70] years; 10 (59%) male, and 16 (94%) White race), 17 patients had fever (100%), 15 had encephalopathy (88%), and 12 had headache (71%). Eleven of 14 patients with CSF cell count differential had a neutrophil predominance (mean = 60.6% of white blood cells) with an elevated protein level (median [IQR], 100 mg/dL [75–145]). Affected neuroanatomic regions included the basal ganglia (n = 9/17), thalamus (n = 7/17), and mesial temporal lobe (n = 7/17). A total of 11 patients (65%) received IVIG; 8 (47%) received steroids. Of the patients who received IVIG, increased time from hospital admission to IVIG administration correlated with worse long-term disability as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (r = 0.72, p = 0.02); steroid use was not associated with the mRS score. The mortality was 12%.

Conclusions Clinicians should suspect EEE in immunocompetent patients with early subcortical neuroimaging abnormalities and CSF neutrophilic predominance. This study suggests a lower mortality than previously reported, but a high morbidity rate in EEE. IVIG as an adjunctive to standard of care may be considered early during hospitalization.

Glossary

AED=
antiepileptic drug;
EEE=
Eastern equine encephalitis;
EEEV=
EEE virus;
IgG/M=
immunoglobulin G/M;
IVIG=
IV immunoglobulin;
WNV=
West Nile virus

Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) is a mosquito-borne viral infection that can result in devastating neurologic disease. Although EEE has likely existed for centuries,1 the first significant outbreak in humans occurred in 1938.2 Since then, outbreaks have been sporadic,3 with an average incidence of 8 cases per year in the United States.4 In 2019, there were 37 confirmed cases of EEE in the United States and 12 in Massachusetts, with 15 deaths, making this the largest outbreak since 1959.5 EEE virus (EEEV) is one of the most virulent neurotropic viruses with an estimated 40% mortality rate observed in the past 2 decades.4 Outbreaks before 1956 predominantly affected the pediatric population, with 82% of those infected younger than 18 years.6 In contrast, between 2003 and 2016, 63% of those affected were older than 40 years.4

Although the majority of people infected with EEEV are suspected to be asymptomatic,7 the clinical presentation of symptomatic adults8 and children9 is characterized by acute onset of fever, headache, nausea, and encephalopathy with variable presence of meningismus, weakness, and seizure. Long-term outcomes data in EEE are limited to the earlier outbreaks in 1938, 1955, and 1956 with mortality at follow-up at 68%.6 Of the survivors, 69% had paralysis or cognitive impairment, with only 31% without a significant impairment at follow-up.6,10 Long-term outcomes of pediatric EEE cases between 1970 and 2010 similarly demonstrated significant disability in 64% of survivors at follow-up.9 Notably, these survival and follow-up studies were conducted before the regular use of IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of EEE and other arboviral infections.8,11,–,13

There are no specific antiviral treatments for EEE, unlike other viral encephalitides including herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus.14 Case reports suggest possible benefit from treatment with IVIG or negative outcomes with high-dose steroids; however, data are limited in EEE.15,–,18 IVIG has been trialed as a treatment for West Nile virus (WNV) encephalitis and other related arboviral infections in small trials with inconclusive results showing no clear benefit on morbidity or mortality.11,12,19,20

The clinical, laboratory, and radiographic characteristics of EEE, including treatment with IVIG and high-dose steroids, remain limited. Here, we describe 17 cases of EEE diagnosed in the northeast over the past 15 years, including the most recent major outbreak in 2019. We also provide available data on postdischarge outcomes in patients treated with IVIG or steroids in addition to standard of care.

Methods

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the Partners Healthcare Institutional Review Board of Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital (Protocol 2019P003215).

Patient identification

EEE cases were identified by searching the Partners Healthcare Research Patient Data Registry system using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th and 10th edition diagnostic codes for EEE (ICD-9: 0622 and ICD-10: A83.2). Testing of patients for EEE was based on clinical suspicion for encephalitis per practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.14 All patients definitively diagnosed with EEE using the Massachusetts Department of Public Health CSF immunoglobulin M/G (IgM/IgG) diagnostic test (screening enzyme immunoassay [EIA] IgM specific for EEE and WNV),21 with the exception of 1 patient on rituximab diagnosed by CSF EEEV PCR (PCR) targeted to the structural polyprotein coding sequence, performed at the William A. Hinton State Laboratory Institute, Department of Public Health, Boston, MA). Although false-positive and negative rates may vary with individual assays, enzyme-based immunoassays for EEE have been reported to have a false-positive rate of 5.6% and a false-negative rate of 0.7%.22 Positive samples were subsequently confirmed by the plaque reduction neutralization test. Patients evaluated at Massachusetts General Hospital or Brigham and Women's Hospital between January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2020, were included in the review.

Data collection and variables

Data on clinical presentation, laboratory values, MRI and EEG studies, treatment, and outcomes were collected until a censoring date of January 1, 2020, and entered into a central HIPAA-complaint database (REDCap). Prodromal period was defined as time from onset of symptoms typical for EEE, including fever, altered mental status, and headache, to presentation to the emergency department. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS)23 was retrospectively determined by 2 independent neurologists (D.R.W. and S.S.M.) for the time points of presentation, discharge from the hospital, and last known follow-up. Treatment groups were identified by patients who received IVIG or high-dose steroids during hospitalization. High doses were defined as greater than 100 mg of prednisone equivalent per day.24,25

All available brain MRI studies were reviewed by 3 study neurologists (F.J.M., D.R.W., and S.S.M.), or when unavailable, the radiologist reports were used. Neuroanatomic regions of involvement were determined by abnormal T2-FLAIR hyperintensity. Regions of interest were determined a priori based on published reports of EEE. Two study neurologists (D.R.W. and S.S.M) independently reviewed EEG reports.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed and graphs created using Prism by GraphPad (8) or R software (v. 3.6.1, Vienna, Austria).26 Univariate analyses were performed for clinical characteristics and laboratory values with mean averages and SD reported. Comparative studies were performed using a Spearman rho. A p value with a 2-tailed distribution was calculated with a level of significance set at 0.05.

Data availability

Full anonymized data from this study are available on request to any qualified investigator.

Results

Patient demographics

The median EEE patient age was 63 years (IQR = 36–70 years) (table 1) with a bimodal distribution that included 3 pediatric cases and an age range from 8 months to 78 years (figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A348). The cases spanned 5 states in the Northeastern United States (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A348). Symptom onset occurred between July and September, with the earliest symptom onset July 30 and the latest September 13. The majority (59%; 10/17) of cases had symptomatic onset in August, with 35% of the remaining cases occurring in September. In 76% (13/17) of patients, there was an identifiable outdoor and mosquito exposure before symptom onset, including outdoor work, hiking, camping, or outdoor school activities (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A348). Sixteen patients had no relevant medical history; 1 patient was immunosuppressed with rituximab (%CD19+ cell count = 0 during hospitalization) as maintenance therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and reported previously.27

View this table:
Table 1

Demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and outcomes in patients with Eastern equine encephalitis

Clinical presentation

Patients had fever (100%, average maximum temperature 39.4°C in adults, 39.7°C in children), altered mental status (n = 15; 88%), and headache (n = 12; 71%) (table 1). The average prodromal period from symptom onset to presentation was 3.4 days (SD = 3 days) (figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A348). The prodromal period ranged from 1 patient with rapid progression of symptoms over the course of 1 day to a maximum length of 9 days. In the emergency department, the majority of patients presented with neurologic symptoms, including altered mental status in 88% and clinical seizures (generalized tonic-clonic episodes) in 41% (n = 7). When analyzed by age group, 100% of children had seizures at presentation compared with 29% of adults. Classic signs suggestive of meningitis, including neck stiffness and photophobia, were less common (n = 3, 18%).

Laboratory characteristics

Serum studies at presentation were characterized by a median leukocytosis of 13,000 cells/mL3 (IQR = 8,000–16,000 cells), low end of normal sodium levels (median = 135 mmol/L, IQR = 133–138 mmol/L), normal platelet counts (median = 187,000 cells/mL3, IQR = 158,000–236,000 cells/mL3), and normal aspartate transaminase and alanine aminotransferase (table 1). All patients had a lumbar puncture performed within 3 days of presentation. The CSF was characterized by a pleocytosis with a median white blood cell (WBC) count of 369 cells/mL3 (IQR = 185–831 cells/mL3) (table 1); the majority (n = 14; 82%) of CSF samples contained less than 1,000 WBC/mL3 (figure 1A). The median CSF WBC count in the 3 pediatric cases was 324 WBC/mL3 compared with 680 WBC/mL3 in adults. It is challenging to make definitive comparisons given the small sample size, but consistent with historical data, there is no apparent difference in CSF WBC count between children and adults.9 CSF protein was elevated to a median of 100 mg/dL (IQR = 75–145 mg/dL), and CSF glucose was normal (median = 65 mg/dL, IQR = 57–78 mg/dL) (figure 1, B and C). A total of 79% (n = 11/14 with differential) of patients had a neutrophilic predominance (60.6% of WBC, SD = 22.8) in their CSF (figure 1D). Two patients had a repeat lumbar puncture within 1–3 days of their initial lumbar puncture and showed a shift to an increased lymphocyte fraction. During admission, 29% of patients developed myelosuppression with leukopenia (n = 1; 6%), thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 6%), or both (n = 3; 18%).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Laboratory characteristics: CSF and serum studies in patients with Eastern equine encephalitis

Case number vs units of white blood cells (A), protein (B), and glucose (C) in the CSF of patients with EEE. CSF WBC differential (D) for patients with EEE with available data. EEE = Eastern equine encephalitis.

Imaging studies

All patients had a brain MRI during admission, and 76% (n = 13) of patients received an MRI within 3 days of presentation. Seventy-one percent of patients (n = 12) had at least 1 additional follow-up MRI during the course of their disease. All patients had an abnormal MRI at presentation with the exception of the immunocompromised patient on rituximab; details of this patient's MRI have been previously reported.15 Typical MRI findings included T2-FLAIR hyperintense signal in the bilateral basal ganglia, thalami, and mesial temporal lobes (figure 2A). Figure 2B demonstrates representative images of patients with mild (mRS 0–2), moderate (mRS 3–4), and severe (mRS 5–6) disability score at discharge. Figure 2C demonstrates a representative T2-FLAIR MRI evolution of an adult case (case 8) over the course of hospitalization. Seven cases had extension of T2-FLAIR hyperintensity into the midbrain and pons (figure 2D), whereas only 1 patient had evidence of meningeal enhancement. In addition to the thalamus, pediatric cases had involvement of the cortex, a feature less commonly observed in adult patients (100% of pediatric cases vs 29% of adults).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Imaging characteristics: typical pattern of MRI involvement and affected neuroanatomic regions in patients with Eastern equine encephalitis

All images displayed are the T2-FLAIR sequence. (A) Representative images of pattern of typical neuroanatomic region involved in 1 patient with demonstrated involvement of the temporal lobe and pons, temporal lobe and midbrain, and basal ganglia by T2-FLAIR hyperintensity (panels left to right). (B) Representative images of patients with mild (mRS 0–2), moderate (mRS 3–4), and severe (mRS 5–6) disability score at discharge. (C) Representative images of 1 patient over course of hospitalization at days 1, 4, and 10 after admission. (D) Quantification of neuroanatomic region involvement in initial MRI of patients with EEE as determined by T2-FLAIR hyperintensity. An area was scored as abnormal only once per patient. EEE = Eastern equine encephalitis.

EEG findings

During hospital admission, all but 1 patient had an EEG performed to evaluate for clinical and subclinical seizures. A total of 41% of patients with EEE had electrographic seizures during their admission as determined by EEG. The majority (59%) of all patients had an abnormal EEG, including electrographic seizures (n = 5), occasional bursts of generalized rhythmic delta activity (n = 2), generalized periodic discharges (n = 2), periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges (n = 2), periodic sharp waves (n = 4), and patterns typical of encephalopathy including diffuse delta and theta frequency slowing (n = 12).

IV immunoglobulin and high-dose steroids

Of the patients in this cohort, 65% (n = 11) received IVIG as part of their treatment plan for EEE (table 1). The average time to IVIG treatment was 5 days (range 2–8 days), and the average time to steroid treatment was 7 days (range 3–27 days). Approximately half of patients (n = 6; 35%) who received IVIG also received high-dose steroids, and 12% (n = 2) received steroids alone.

Outcomes

The overall mortality in patients with EEE in this study during hospitalization was 12% (table 1), lower than historical reports.4,6,8 Twelve of the 15 patients who survived EEE had available follow-up clinical data. The median follow-up time was 138 days after initial presentation (range 14–1,586 days). No patients had a reported disability before symptom onset. On average, patients presented to the hospital with moderately severe disability (mRS 3.8) and were discharged without a clinically meaningful change in scores (mRS 3.6) (figure 3A). Seventy-one percent of patients (n = 12) were discharged to an acute inpatient rehabilitation center, 1 patient who was immunosuppressed (6%) died while hospitalized, 1 patient (6%) was discharged to hospice care and died, and the remainder (n = 3; 18%) were discharged home without requiring any at-home services. Among those with available follow-up by chart review, there was a reduction in the median mRS compared with discharge mRS (follow-up mRS 3, IQR = 0–6 vs discharge mRS 4, IQR = 1–6) (figure 3A). Long-term management with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at follow-up was necessary in 2 of 3 children (67%) and no adult patients.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Outcomes in patients with Eastern equine encephalitis

Patient disability by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of patients with EEE at admission to the hospital, discharge from the hospital, and last recorded follow-up (A). Time to IVIG administration compared with mRS at discharge (B) and most recent clinical follow-up (C). Comparative studies were performed using a Spearman rho and a p value with a 2-tailed distribution. EEE = Eastern equine encephalitis; IVIG = IV immunoglobulin.

We were interested to determine whether there was a correlation between discharge or follow-up mRS and time to IVIG administration among treated individuals (figure 3, B and C). Admission mRS before treatment did not correlate with time to IVIG administration, indicating that the severity of neurologic disease did not affect the time to IVIG initiation (figure e-2A, links.lww.com/NXI/A348), and the median baseline mRS among patients who received IVIG and those who did not receive IVIG was similar. In contrast, time to IVIG administration correlated with mRS scores at discharge and follow-up (figure 3, B and C). This trend held true when the immunocompromised patient was excluded. There was no correlation between admission, discharge, or follow-up mRS and time to steroid administration (figure e-2, links.lww.com/NXI/A348). Six patients did not receive immunomodulatory therapy, making comparisons between IVIG and standard of care challenging.

Although the overall number of patients is not large enough to determine a clear relationship between radiographic findings and disability score, patients with more neuroanatomic regions affected at presentation tended to have worse disability at discharge and follow-up (figure e-3, links.lww.com/NXI/A348). Outliers include the patient (case 5) who had an unremarkable MRI at presentation, was on rituximab, and ultimately died. The patient (case 16) with 4 neuroanatomic regions affected and admission mRS 4 had low follow-up mRS 1 and was a pediatric case.

Follow-up clinical visits for patients who survived EEE were reviewed to understand the long-term disability among survivors and the typical pattern of disability. Patients with ongoing disability at follow-up (11/12 with available data) commonly had clinical evidence of cognitive or memory impairment, increased muscle tone in the extremities, and spasticity. Thirty-three percent (n = 4) had difficulty in language, ranging from decreased spontaneous speech to global aphasia with no language understanding or production. Eight patients (67%) regained ability to participate in the activities of daily living. Only 1 patient (case 12) with an admission mRS of 1 had no disability at follow-up. It is difficult to be certain if IVIG had any impact on the natural history of EEE as only 8 patients were in the treatment group and there is no matched control group by age or severity of illness.

Discussion

This study is a case series detailing clinical, laboratory, radiographic, and patient outcomes with use of IVIG for off-label treatment of EEE. The overall mortality in this population was 12%, compared with past studies, which estimated the mortality from EEE to be approximately 40%, including a prior case series from New England.8 This difference in mortality is likely multifactorial, including improvements in standard care modalities and possibly increased EEE CSF testing to identify less severe cases.

The clinical presentation and epidemiology of EEE patients in this study closely reflects prior studies, with a presentation characterized by fever, headache, and encephalopathy in an endemic region.1,4,8 No cases presented later than mid-September, and patients had a maximum prodrome length of 9 days, an important consideration when evaluating patients for possible EEE. The seasonal timeline of cases is also consistent with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health mosquito surveillance data, with the latest EEE positive mosquito vector on October 3 in the most recent 2019 outbreak.28 Unlike some opportunistic viral CNS infections, including cytomegalovirus, human herpes virus 6, and JC virus, the majority of EEE patients were healthy immunocompetent adults, and only 1 patient in this study was immunocompromised. The age distribution of EEE cases was bimodal with a cluster of pediatric cases and most adult cases occurring in patients older than 60 years. This possibly reflects age-dependent changes in the CNS immune response leading to increased susceptibility and severity of disease in children and older adults.29,–,31

Unlike other viral encephalitides typically characterized by a lymphocytic predominance in the CSF,32 including herpesviruses and enteroviruses, the majority (79%) of patients with EEE had an initial neutrophilic predominance, consistent with prior studies.33 These data reflect preclinical models and pathologic studies of EEE34,35 and suggest that patients have a robust early neutrophilic innate immune response to EEEV, which later develops into a lymphocyte-predominant adaptive response. Why some viruses initiate a neutrophilic response early in infection while others are lymphocyte predominant is likely the result of multiple complex host-pathogen interactions, including viral evasion of the early innate response, generation of pathogen-specific T cells, and correlation between a patient's clinical presentation and viral replication in the brain.36,37

The neuroanatomic distribution of EEE pathology seen on MRI reflects a viral predilection for the basal ganglia, thalamus, and mesial temporal lobe. Although other etiologies of viral encephalitis affect the mesial temporal lobe, namely HSV encephalitis,38 EEEV also has characteristic involvement of deep basal ganglia and thalamic structures.8 Of interest, children in this study had more cortical involvement compared with adults, which was also seen in a large review of pediatric cases.9 Preclinical studies in other CNS arboviral infections suggest that tropism may be driven by region-dependent immune responses resulting in differential susceptibility within the brain.39 Although there are no standardized MRI scoring systems for CNS infections, comparing the MRI at admission to the long-term disability score, there is a trend toward more neuroanatomic regions involved relating to worse disability at follow-up.

The theoretical benefit from IVIG is thought to be due to antibody neutralization of virus particles and IgG suppression of immune function. The influence of IVIG on the immune response may occur partly through inhibition of macrophage activity, disruption of T-cell interactions with antigen-presenting cells, and downregulation of B-cell proliferation and endogenous antibody production.40 Although there was a positive correlation between time to IVIG administration and disability score at follow-up, which could suggest that early IVIG administration decreases long-term disability, we interpret these data with caution. Conclusions regarding the utility of IVIG in the treatment of EEE are limited by the relatively small size of the sample population and inability to control for relevant patient factors including age, sex, and disease severity. At this time, it is only speculative that earlier initiation of IVIG may be associated with a reduction in disability and would require a prospective study or clinical trial. High-dose steroids did not correlate with disability in this study.

Of interest, all patients with the exception of case 4 (adult) and case 5 (immunosuppressed) had improvement in their mRS between admission and follow-up, regardless of steroid and IVIG intervention. In addition, these data demonstrate that despite almost half of patients with EEE experiencing seizures at presentation or during admission, no adult patients went on to require long-term management with AEDs. This may be related to the primarily basal ganglia and thalamic location of pathology in EEE compared with other etiologies of viral encephalitis, such as herpes simplex virus, which typically have cortical involvement and high rates of postviral epilepsy.41 In contrast to adults with EEE, children in this study had higher rates of cortical involvement, and the majority (67%) required long-term management with AEDs.

This study is limited by its retrospective nature and reliance on electronic medical record for the collection of data throughout the disease course. Patients were not randomized to receive IVIG or steroids, and the factors that went into treatment decisions were not clear in the medical notes. The study is also limited by the small number of patients, which is driven by the rarity of EEE resulting in neurologic complications requiring hospitalization, typically considered to be approximately 5% of all people infected with EEEV. It is likely that as testing becomes more frequent, there will be a larger portion of mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic patients identified, similar to other arboviral infections including WNV.42 Of interest, the mortality rate in our study was low (12%) despite most patients being transferred to tertiary hospitals for advanced care, which typically occurs in more severe cases, and can constitute referral bias. Although a prospective study of EEE with larger samples sizes would reduce some of these limitations, the rarity of this disease makes prospective studies challenging to perform.

This study, despite the challenges with its retrospective nature, suggests that any immunomodulator trials will need to consider early intervention in trial designs and possibly be aided by biomarkers such as neuroimaging. Irrespective of intervention, there was minimal change from admission mRS to discharge mRS in immunocompetent adults, which suggests that preventive measures to reduce EEEV transmission will provide the most benefit in endemic areas in the absence of an effective vaccine or targeted antiviral therapy.

Study funding

S.S. Mukerji and S.I. Collens were funded by the National Institute of Mental Heath at the National Institutes of Health (grant No. K23MH115812).

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Appendix Authors

Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • ↵* These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

  • Received September 3, 2020.
  • Accepted in final form September 28, 2020.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Morens DM,
    2. Folkers GK,
    3. Fauci AS
    . Eastern equine encephalitis virus—another emergent arbovirus in the United States. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1989–1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fothergill LD,
    2. Dingle JH,
    3. Farber S,
    4. Connerley ML
    . Human encephalitis caused by the virus of the eastern variety of equine encephalomyelitis. N Engl J Med 1938;219:411.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Armstrong PM,
    2. Andreadis TG
    . Eastern equine encephalitis virus—old enemy, new threat. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1670–1673.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lindsey NP,
    2. Staples JE,
    3. Fischer M
    . Eastern equine encephalitis virus in the United States, 2003-2016. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018;98:1472–1477.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Monath TP
    . Arthropod-borne encephalitides in the Americas. Bull World Health Organ 1979;57:513–533.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Feemster RF
    . Equine encephalitis in Massachusetts. N Engl J Med 1957;257:701–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Goldfield M,
    2. Welsh JN,
    3. Taylor BF
    . The 1959 outbreak of eastern encephalitis in New Jersey: 5. The inapparent infection: disease ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1968;87:32–38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Deresiewicz RL,
    2. Thaler SJ,
    3. Hsu L,
    4. Zamani AA
    . Clinical and neuroradiographic manifestations of eastern equine encephalitis. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1867–1874.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Silverman MA,
    2. Misasi J,
    3. Smole S, et al
    . Eastern equine encephalitis in children, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, USA, 1970-2010. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19:194–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Getting VA
    . Equine encephalomyelitis in Massachusetts. N Engl J Med 1941;224:999–1006.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Winston DJ,
    2. Vikram HR,
    3. Rabe IB, et al
    . Donor-derived West Nile virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: report of four additional cases and review of clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic features. Transplantation 2014;97:881–889.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Rayamajhi A,
    2. Nightingale S,
    3. Bhatta NK, et al
    . A preliminary randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for Japanese encephalitis in Nepal. PLoS One 2015;10:e0122608.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hartmann CA,
    2. Vikram HR,
    3. Seville MT, et al
    . Neuroinvasive St. Louis encephalitis virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transpl 2017;17:2200–2206.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tunkel AR,
    2. Glaser CA,
    3. Bloch KC, et al
    . The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:303–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mukerji SS,
    2. Lam AD,
    3. Wilson MR
    . Eastern equine encephalitis treated with intravenous immunoglobulins. Neurohospitalist 2016;6:29–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Golomb MR,
    2. Durand M,
    3. Schaefer PW,
    4. McDonald CT,
    5. Maia M,
    6. Schwamm LH
    . A case of immunotherapy-responsive eastern equine encephalitis with diffusion-weighted imaging. Neurology 2001;56:420–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Wendell LC,
    2. Stevenson Potter N,
    3. Roth JL,
    4. Salloway SP,
    5. Thompson BB
    . Successful management of severe neuroinvasive eastern equine encephalitis. Neurocrit Care 2013;19:111–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Erkkinen M,
    2. Srikanth M,
    3. Lyons J,
    4. Vaitkevicius H
    . Successful treatment of eastern equine encephalitis with early, empiric initiation of intravenous immunoglobulin: a case report (P6.306). Neurology 2015;84:P6.306.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Makhoul B,
    2. Braun E,
    3. Herskovitz M,
    4. Ramadan R,
    5. Hadad S,
    6. Norberto K
    . Hyperimmune gammaglobulin for the treatment of West Nile virus encephalitis. Isr Med Assoc J 2009;11:151–153.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Haley M,
    2. Retter AS,
    3. Fowler D,
    4. Gea-Banacloche J,
    5. O'Grady NP
    . The role for intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of West Nile virus encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:e88–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. HEALTH DOP
    1. Smole SC
    . Manual of Laboratory Tests and Services. In: HEALTH DOP, ed, 7th ed.Boston, MA: Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences; 2018.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Johnson AJ,
    2. Martin DA,
    3. Karabatsos N,
    4. Roehrig JT
    . Detection of anti-arboviral immunoglobulin G by using a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1827–1831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. van Swieten JC,
    2. Koudstaal PJ,
    3. Visser MC,
    4. Schouten HJ,
    5. van Gijn J
    . Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–607.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Nakano A,
    2. Yamasaki R,
    3. Miyazaki S,
    4. Horiuchi N,
    5. Kunishige M,
    6. Mitsui T
    . Beneficial effect of steroid pulse therapy on acute viral encephalitis. Eur Neurol 2003;50:225–229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hoke CH Jr.,
    2. Vaughn DW,
    3. Nisalak A, et al
    . Effect of high-dose dexamethasone on the outcome of acute encephalitis due to Japanese encephalitis virus. J Infect Dis 1992;165:631–637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [computer program]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Solomon IH,
    2. Ciarlini PDSC,
    3. Santagata S, et al
    . Fatal eastern equine encephalitis in a patient on maintenance rituximab: a case report. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:ofx021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    Sciences MDoPHBoIDaL. 2019 Massachusetts Arbovirus Daily Update: Mosquito Samples Positive [online]. Available at: mosquitoresults.com/mosquitos-positive/. Accessed May 10, 2020.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Morgan IM
    . Influence of age on susceptibility and on immune response of mice to eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus. J Exp Med 1941;74:115–132.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Wilcox DR,
    2. Folmsbee SS,
    3. Muller WJ,
    4. Longnecker R
    . The type I interferon response determines differences in choroid plexus susceptibility between newborns and adults in herpes simplex virus encephalitis. MBio 2016;7:e00437–00416.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Wilcox DR,
    2. Wadhwani NR,
    3. Longnecker R,
    4. Muller WJ
    . Differential reliance on autophagy for protection from HSV encephalitis between newborns and adults. PLoS Pathog 2015;11:e1004580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Jaijakul S,
    2. Salazar L,
    3. Wootton SH,
    4. Aguilera E,
    5. Hasbun R
    . The clinical significance of neutrophilic pleocytosis in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with viral central nervous system infections. Int J Infect Dis 2017;59:77–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Przelomski MM,
    2. O'Rourke E,
    3. Grady GF,
    4. Berardi VP,
    5. Markley HG
    . Eastern equine encephalitis in Massachusetts: a report of 16 cases, 1970-1984. Neurology 1988;38:736–739.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Farber S,
    2. Hill A,
    3. Connerly ML,
    4. Dingle JH
    . Encephalitis in infants and children: caused by the virus of the eastern variety of equine encephalitis. J Am Med Assoc 1940;114:1725–1731.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Vogel P,
    2. Kell WM,
    3. Fritz DL,
    4. Parker MD,
    5. Schoepp RJ
    . Early events in the pathogenesis of eastern equine encephalitis virus in mice. Am J Pathol 2005;166:159–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lopez-Cortes LF,
    2. Cruz-Ruiz M,
    3. Gomez-Mateos J,
    4. Viciana-Fernandez P,
    5. Martinez-Marcos FJ,
    6. Pachon J
    . Interleukin-8 in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with meningitis of different etiologies: its possible role as neutrophil chemotactic factor. J Infect Dis 1995;172:581–584.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Richner JM,
    2. Gmyrek GB,
    3. Govero J, et al
    . Age-dependent cell trafficking defects in draining lymph nodes impair adaptive immunity and control of West Nile virus infection. PLoS Pathog 2013;11:e1005027.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Tyler KL
    . Acute viral encephalitis. N Engl J Med 2018;379:557–566.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Daniels BP,
    2. Jujjavarapu H,
    3. Durrant DM, et al
    . Regional astrocyte IFN signaling restricts pathogenesis during neurotropic viral infection. J Clin Invest 2017;127:843–856.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hartung HP
    . Advances in the understanding of the mechanism of action of IVIg. J Neurol 2008;255(suppl 3):3–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Sellner J,
    2. Trinka E
    . Seizures and epilepsy in herpes simplex virus encephalitis: current concepts and future directions of pathogenesis and management. J Neurol 2012;259:2019–2030.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Petersen LR
    . Epidemiology of West Nile virus in the United States: implications for arbovirology and public Health. J Med Entomol 2019;56:1456–1462.
    OpenUrl

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

Alert Me

Advertisement