Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation COVID-19 Article Hub
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • COVID-19 Article Hub
  • Infographics & Video Summaries

Share

January 2021; 8 (1) ArticleOpen Access

Interleukin-15 enhances proinflammatory T-cell responses in patients with MS and EAE

Cyril Laurent, Gabrielle Deblois, Marie-Laure Clénet, Ana Carmena Moratalla, Negar Farzam-kia, Marc Girard, Pierre Duquette, View ORCID ProfileAlexandre Prat, Catherine Larochelle, View ORCID ProfileNathalie Arbour
First published December 15, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000931
Cyril Laurent
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cyri.laurent@icloud.com
Gabrielle Deblois
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: g.deblois92@live.ca
Marie-Laure Clénet
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: marie-laure.clenet@outlook.fr
Ana Carmena Moratalla
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anacarmena3@gmail.com
Negar Farzam-kia
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: negarf.16@gmail.com
Marc Girard
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m_girard@videotron.ca
Pierre Duquette
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pierre.duquette.1@umontreal.ca
Alexandre Prat
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexandre Prat
  • For correspondence: a.prat@umontreal.ca
Catherine Larochelle
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cath_larochelle@yahoo.com
Nathalie Arbour
From the Department of Neurosciences (C. Laurent, G.D., M.-L.C., A.C.M., N.F.-k., M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle, N.A.), Université de Montréal and CRCHUM; and MS-CHUM Clinic (M.G., P.D., A.P., C. Larochelle), Québec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nathalie Arbour
Full PDF
Citation
Interleukin-15 enhances proinflammatory T-cell responses in patients with MS and EAE
Cyril Laurent, Gabrielle Deblois, Marie-Laure Clénet, Ana Carmena Moratalla, Negar Farzam-kia, Marc Girard, Pierre Duquette, Alexandre Prat, Catherine Larochelle, Nathalie Arbour
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Jan 2021, 8 (1) e931; DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000931

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
827

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective We posit that interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a relevant contributor to MS pathobiology as this cytokine is elevated in the CNS and periphery of patients with MS. We aim to investigate (1) the impact of IL-15 on T lymphocytes from patients with MS and (2) the in vivo role of IL-15 using the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mouse model.

Methods We compared the impact of IL-15 on T lymphocytes obtained from untreated patients with MS (relapsing-remitting, secondary progressive, and primary progressive) to cells from age/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) using multiparametric flow cytometry and in vitro assays. We tested the effects of peripheral IL-15 administration after EAE disease onset in C57BL/6 mice.

Results IL-15 triggered STAT5 signaling in an elevated proportion of T cells from patients with MS compared with HCs. This cytokine also enhanced the production of key proinflammatory cytokines (interferon γ, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF], IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor) by T cells from both MS and controls, but these effects were more robust for the production of IL-17 and GM-CSF in T-cell subsets from patients with MS. At the peak of EAE disease, the proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing CD122+, the key signaling IL-15 receptor chain, was enriched in the CNS compared with the spleen. Finally, peripheral administration of IL-15 into EAE mice after disease onset significantly aggravated clinical scores and increased the number of inflammatory CNS-infiltrating T cells long term after stopping IL-15 administration.

Conclusions Our results underscore that IL-15 contributes to the amplification of T-cell inflammatory properties after disease onset in both MS and EAE.

Glossary

EAE=
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis;
GM-CSF=
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor;
HC=
healthy control;
IFN=
interferon;
IL=
interleukin;
PBMC=
peripheral blood mononuclear cell;
PMS=
progressive MS;
PPMS=
primary progressive MS;
RRMS=
relapsing-remitting MS;
SPMS=
secondary progressive MS;
TNF=
tumor necrosis factor

Interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a potential contributing factor to the pathobiology of MS.1,–,3 CNS cells (astrocytes and microglia) and peripheral blood cells (monocytes and B lymphocytes) from subjects with MS express elevated levels of IL-15 compared with controls.1,–,4 We demonstrated that human CD8+ T lymphocytes pre-exposed to IL-15 exhibit an increased ability to kill oligodendrocytes in vitro and to migrate across an in vitro human model of the blood-brain barrier.2 Although IL-15 and IL-2 share the same receptor signaling chains, IL-15 displays unique properties and targets a broader range of cells.5,6

The effects of IL-15 on disease induction have been previously examined in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).7,–,9 Although aggravated EAE was reported for IL-15−/− mice compared with controls,8,–,10 definitive conclusions are hindered by the abnormal immune system in IL-15−/− mice11,12 (i.e., reduced numbers of several immune cell subsets). Therefore, this model does not closely reflect human MS pathobiology.

We sought to investigate whether IL-15 shapes T-cell responses in patients with MS and the underlying mechanisms of such IL-15–mediated effects. We herein report that in both patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS), IL-15 induces signaling in a greater proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes compared with age/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). We also show that IL-15 more potently increases proinflammatory properties (e.g., IL-17 production) by MS T lymphocytes. Moreover, we establish using the EAE model that elevated peripheral IL-15 levels contribute to disease progression after the onset of symptoms. Thus, IL-15 represents a novel, relevant therapeutic target in MS.

Methods

Ethics

Written informed consent was obtained from every donor before sample collection, in accordance with institutional guidelines; these studies were approved by the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal research ethics committee (approval numbers BH 07.001 and HD 07.002). Untreated patients with MS were recruited from the MS-CHUM Clinic between 2016 and 2019. Each untreated patient was diagnosed according to the 2010 and 2017 revised McDonald criteria13 and classified as RRMS, secondary progressive (SPMS), or primary progressive (PPMS) at the time of blood collection by a highly trained MS neurologist. Untreated patients with MS were separated into 2 groups: RRMS and PMS, the latter including patients with SPMS and PPMS. T lymphocytes from patients with SPMS and PPMS exhibited similar properties and responses in our assays. Age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were used as controls. To account for the differences in age and sex between the 2 MS cohorts, each untreated MS group was compared with a different group of age/sex-matched HCs.

All mice were treated in strict adherence with approved protocols (N13043NAs and N17031NAs) from the CRCHUM Institutional Committee for the Protection of Animals and the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Data availability

Data not provided in the article because of space limitations can be shared at the request of other investigators for purposes of replicating procedures and results.

Results

CD122 is similarly expressed by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from patients with MS and HCs

CD8+ T lymphocytes from patients with MS are more responsive to IL-15 than their counterparts from HC.2 However, the underlying mechanisms that control IL-15's impact on MS T lymphocytes have not been identified. We sought to determine whether this is due to elevated expression of the cognate receptor. The IL-15 signaling receptor is composed of 2 chains: CD132 and CD122. CD132 (also known as common γ chain, γc) is shared by many cytokines and expressed by most lymphocytes.14 In contrast, CD122 is specific to IL-15 and IL-2.5 We assessed the expression of CD122 (IL-2/IL-15Rβ) on ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from untreated patients with MS and age/sex-matched HCs (figure 1A). The percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets (naive, central memory, and effector memory) expressing CD122 were similar or slightly higher, without reaching significance, in patients with RRMS and PMS compared with their respective age/sex-matched HCs (figure 1B). As CD122 is shared by IL-15 and IL-2, we also measured the expression of CD25 (IL-2Rα), the high-affinity IL-2 receptor chain (figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A356). CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes from patients with RRMS and PMS contained similar or slightly elevated proportions of CD25+ cells compared with matched HCs without reaching statistical significance (figure e-1, A and B). Overall, our results show that the proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing CD122 or CD25 are not significantly different in patients with MS compared with age/sex-matched HCs. Our results corroborate our previous report on the expression of CD122 by global CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.2 Therefore, factors other than CD122 expression contribute to the altered IL-15 responsiveness in T lymphocytes from patients with MS.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 CD122 is similarly expressed by T lymphocytes from patients with MS and healthy controls

Ex vivo PBMCs obtained from untreated patients with MS and age/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were analyzed by flow cytometry for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO, CCR7, CD25, and CD122. The expression of CD122 (IL-2/IL-15β chain) was determined on naive, central memory (CM), and effector memory (EM) subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Gating strategy was performed as previously described.15 (A) Representative contour plots (black FMO/isotype, red CD122) on CM CD4+ T cells from 1 RRMS donor. (B) Percentages of cells expressing CD122 are shown for each subset of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and compared between untreated patients with MS and HCs; each dot represents 1 donor. Patients with RRMS and PMS (including SPMS and PPMS) were analyzed separately and compared with respective age/sex-matched HCs (RRMS: n = 13, PMS: n = 9–10). Naive T lymphocytes are shown in green, CM T lymphocytes in red, and EM T lymphocytes in blue. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. IL = interleukin; PBMC = peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PMS = progressive MS; PPMS = primary progressive MS; RRMS = relapsing-remitting MS.

IL-15 triggers pSTAT5 in a greater proportion of T lymphocytes from patients with MS than HCs

We next inquired whether a more robust signaling could contribute to the enhanced IL-15 responsiveness of T lymphocytes from patients with MS.2 As IL-15 primarily triggers STAT5 in T lymphocytes,5 we compared the IL-15–induced STAT5 phosphorylation (pSTAT5) in patients with RRMS and PMS with age/sex-matched HCs. Ex vivo PBMCs were incubated with increasing concentrations of IL-15 for 15 minutes (peak response to IL-1515) before being analyzed by flow cytometry (figure 2A). The proportions of central memory CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes expressing pSTAT5 on IL-15 stimulation were significantly greater in RRMS compared with age/sex-matched HCs (figure 2, B and C); similar results were obtained for naive counterparts, almost reaching significance. Moreover, all CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets from patients with PMS exhibited significantly elevated proportions of pSTAT5 on IL-15 stimulation compared with matched HCs (figure 2, B and C). In contrast, IL-2 induced pSTAT5 in similar proportions of T lymphocytes from patients with RRMS and PMS compared with their respective age/sex-matched HCs (figure e-1C, links.lww.com/NXI/A356). Although IL-2 and IL-15 share common signaling receptor chains, only the IL-15–triggered pSTAT5 was increased in T lymphocytes from patients with MS compared with HCs, particularly in patients with PMS.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2 IL-15 triggers pSTAT5 in greater percentages of T lymphocytes from patients with MS compared with controls

(A) Ex vivo PBMCs incubated in the presence of increasing concentrations of IL-15 were stained for CD3, CD4, CD8, CCR7, CD45RA, CD45RO, and pSTAT5 and analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative contour plots of typical pSTAT5 expression in CM CD4+ T cells, untreated or stimulated with 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 ng/mL of IL-15 for 15 minutes, are shown. (B) Dose-response of IL-15 triggering pSTAT5 for each T-cell subset of CD4+ and CD8+ (naive, CM, and EM) in HCs and patients with MS (RRMS n = 9 and PMS n = 10). (C) For the 1.0 ng/mL IL-15 dose, the percentage of pSTAT5 expressing cells is illustrated for each T-cell subset and donor group. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance followed by the Fisher least significant difference post hoc test comparing pSTAT5 expression by each T-cell subset from patients with MS vs HCs #0.05 < p < 0.1, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. CM = central memory; EM = effector memory; IL = interleukin; PBMC = peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PMS = progressive MS; RRMS = relapsing-remitting MS.

IL-15 favors the production of key proinflammatory cytokines

It is well established that T lymphocytes contribute to the pathobiology of MS by multiple mechanisms including the release of key inflammatory cytokines such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-17, and interferon (IFN) γ.16 IL-15 increases the production of IL-17,17 tumor necrosis factor (TNF),18 and IFNγ2 by human T cells. Moreover, STAT5 signaling has been shown to promote GM-CSF production by mouse and human T cells.19,20 We therefore investigated whether the enhanced IL-15 responsiveness of T lymphocytes from patients with MS augments the production of these inflammatory cytokines by unpolarized or Th1/Tc1 or Th17/Tc17 polarized CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (representative IFNγ and IL-17 production detected after polarization shown in figure e-2A, links.lww.com/NXI/A357). To determine the direct effects of IL-15 on T lymphocytes, we activated purified naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with α-CD3/α-CD28 in the absence of antigen-presenting cells. We observed elevated percentages of Th1/Tc1 cells producing IFNγ in the presence of IL-15 (figure 3A); however, we did not detect differences between patients with MS and HCs (figure 4A). In contrast, IL-15 significantly increased the proportion of IL-17+ cells in Th0 and Th17 conditions in patients with RRMS, but not in HCs (figures 3B and 4B). IL-15 also significantly enhanced the proportion of IL-17+ cells in the Th17 condition for patients with PMS. The IL-15–mediated increase, illustrated as Δ percentage of cytokine+ cells (percentage cytokine+ cells in the presence of IL-15 minus percentage cytokine+ cells without IL-15) (figure 4B, right panel), shows that Th0 from RRMS and Th17 from PMS exhibited the greatest IL-15–mediated increase in IL17 production. The percentage of IL-17–producing CD8 T lymphocytes starting from naive cells was too low for most donors to investigate the impact of IL-15.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3 IL-15 stimulation increases the production of cytokines by T lymphocytes under polarizing conditions

Naive CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were cultured under polarizing conditions or not in the presence or absence of IL-15 and subsequently treated with phorbol myristate acetate + ionomycin + brefeldin A for 5 hours before being stained for CD4, CD8, IFNγ, IL-17, GM-CSF, and TNF. (A–D) Representative contour plots of T cells expressing the cytokine in the absence/presence of IL-15–producing IFNγ (A), IL-17 (B), GM-CSF (C), or TNF (D). GM-CSF = granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; HC = healthy control; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4 IL-15–mediated increase in the production of cytokines by T lymphocytes is enhanced in MS

Naive CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes were cultured under polarizing conditions or not in the presence or absence of IL-15 and subsequently treated with phorbol myristate acetate + ionomycin + brefeldin A for 5 hours before being stained for CD4, CD8, IFNγ, IL-17, GM-CSF, and TNF. (A–D) Percentages of Th0, Th1, Th17, Tc0, Tc1, or Tc17 cells (as indicated on each graph) producing IFNγ (A), IL-17 (B), GM-CSF (C), or TNF (D) in untreated patients with MS (RRMS n = 7–9 and PMS n = 6–8) compared with respective age/sex-matched HCs. Graphs on the left show percentage of cytokine producing cells by subset and donor groups and graphs on right-hand side show IL-15–induced effects (percentage of cytokine + cells in the presence of IL-15 minus percentage cytokine + cells in the absence of IL-15) for each condition and donor group. Each dot represents 1 donor. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Student 2-tailed paired t test or Wilcoxon test comparing IL-15− vs IL-15+ stimulation for each cell subset and donor subset p values are shown in color; 1-way analysis of variance followed by the uncorrected Fisher least significant difference test or Friedman test for comparison of MS vs HC p values shown in black. #0.05 < p < 0.1; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. GM-CSF = granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; HC = healthy control; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; PMS = progressive MS; RRMS = relapsing-remitting MS; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.

We observed that IL-15 significantly increased the proportions of GM-CSF+ and TNF+ cells in Th17/Tc17-polarized T cells from all donors (figures 3, C and D and 4, C and D). Notably, the impact of IL-15 on GM-CSF was more significant on Tc17 cells (mean Δ percentage: 19.1%) from patients with PMS compared with age/sex-matched HCs (mean Δ percentage: 8.5%) (figure 4C, right panel). We observed that IL-15 boosted the amount of secreted GM-CSF and TNF in the supernatants of several T-cell populations from both healthy and MS donor groups (figure e-2B, links.lww.com/NXI/A357). Notably, Tc17 cells from RRMS produced greater amounts of GM-CSF and TNF than cells from HCs, regardless of IL-15 addition (figure e-2B). IL-15 increased the expression of GM-CSF in Th0/Tc0 and TNF in most Th0/Tc0 and Th1/Tc1 to similar levels in all donors (figure e-2, C and D). Overall, we showed that IL-15 significantly augments the expression of key mediators of the Th1/Tc1 and Th17/Tc17 signature. Such IL-15–mediated effects are more robust in specific T-cell subsets and conditions in patients with MS compared with age/sex-matched HCs (IL-17 production by RRMS Th0 and PMS Th17 and GM-CSF production by PMS Tc17).

CD122+ T cells from EAE mice display proinflammatory properties

We have previously shown that T cells from patients with MS are exposed to elevated levels of IL-15 both in the periphery and CNS.1,2 Moreover, IL-15 significantly boosts key inflammatory cytokines produced by human CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes (figures 3 and 4). These T-cell subsets and cytokines play central roles in the pathobiology of the EAE mouse model.16,21 Therefore, we sought to evaluate the presence of potential IL-15 responder T lymphocytes, which express the CD122 receptor, at the peak of EAE (EAE score 3.0–4.0). Using cell surface markers CD45 and CD11b, we identified microglia (CD45lowCD11b+), macrophages (CD45hiCD11b+), and nonmyeloid leukocytes (CD45hiCD11b−) in the CNS of these mice. Then, we identified CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes by gating on nonmyeloid leukocytes (CD45hiCD11b−) as illustrated in figure 5A. At the peak of disease (EAE score 3.0–4.0; day 14–19 postimmunization), the majority of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes that have infiltrated the CNS (pooled brain + spinal cord for each mouse) of EAE mice expressed CD122, and these proportions were significantly greater compared with their splenocyte counterparts (figure 5B). As the broadly used short phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycin/brefeldin A in vitro stimulation downregulated the CD122 surface expression, we characterized T lymphocytes from mice that received an intraperitoneal injection of brefeldin A 5 hours before being killed for organ collection and flow cytometry assessment. The in vivo production of the proinflammatory cytokines IFNγ and GM-CSF was compared in CD122+ vs CD122− T lymphocytes obtained from the CNS and spleen from EAE mice at disease peak (figure 5, C and D). Among CNS-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, significantly higher proportions of CD122+ cells produced IFNγ and GM-CSF compared with their CD122− counterparts (figure 5, C and D). Finally, a higher proportion of splenic CD122+ CD4+ T lymphocytes produced IFNγ or GM-CSF compared with CD122− counterparts, whereas only the percentage of splenic CD122+ CD8+ T lymphocytes producing GM-CSF was elevated compared with CD122− counterparts (figure 5, C and D). Overall, our results highlight that at the peak of EAE disease, within CNS-infiltrating T lymphocytes, proinflammatory CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes are enriched among those carrying CD122 and are thus susceptible to IL-15.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5 Enrichment of CD122+ T cells in the CNS of EAE mice

Splenocytes and CNS-infiltrated leukocytes were collected from EAE mice at disease peak and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A and B) Cells were stained for CD45, CD11b, CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD122. Representative contour plots of CNS cells illustrating the detection of microglia (CD45lowCD11b+), macrophages (CD45hiCD11b+), and nonmyeloid leukocytes (CD45hiCD11b−) and gating for CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes within CD45hiCD11b− cells. (B) Assessment of CD122 expression by T lymphocytes from EAE mice at disease peak. Representative contour plots illustrating CD122 expression on CNS-infiltrating CD4+ T lymphocytes in EAE. Percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes expressing CD122 in the CNS (white bars) and the spleen (black bars) n = 20. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by the Sidak multiple comparison test comparing percentage of CD122+ CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes CNS vs spleen **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. (C and D) Cells were collected from EAE mice at disease peak 5 hours after the in vivo injection of brefeldin A and stained with CD45, CD11b, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD122, IFNγ, and GM-CSF. Representative contour plots gated on CD4+CD122− or CD4+CD122+ T lymphocytes illustrating the expression of GM-CSF (C) or IFNγ (D) in the CNS. Percentage of CD122− (white bars) and CD122+ (gray bars) CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes expressing GM-CSF (C) or IFNγ (D) in the CNS and the spleen, n = 9–13. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by the Sidak multiple comparison test comparing percentage of CNS or splenic GM-CSF+ in CD122− vs CD122+ CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes. Friedman test followed by the Dunn test comparing percentage of CNS or splenic IFNγ+ in CD122− vs CD122+ CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. ANOVA = analysis of variance; EAE = experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; GM-CSF = granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.

Peripheral administration of the active form of IL-15 increases EAE severity

To definitively establish the role of IL-15 in EAE and to mimic the elevated IL-15 levels we and others detected in the blood of patients with MS,2,22 we investigated the impact of increasing peripheral levels of IL-15 after disease onset. We used the same approach as published by others and injected the biologically active form of IL-15 precomplexed with IL-15Rα.23,24 We used a physiologic approach to increase IL-15 levels in vivo using the IL-15/IL-15Rα complex.25 This complex is the biologically active form of the cytokine25 and mimics what is found in mouse and human biological fluids.26 At disease onset (EAE score 1.0–1.5), mice were randomized into 2 groups and received a daily injection of the IL-15/IL-15Rα complex or the control IL-15Rα for 8 consecutive days. EAE clinical scores from 3 pooled experiments are represented (figure 6A). IL-15/IL-15Rα–treated mice exhibited a clear and significant worsening of disease severity compared with control mice from day 9 posttreatment up to the end of the monitoring period (up to 20 days after treatment); mice injected with PBS only had similar clinical scores to IL-15Rα only (data not shown). Increasing peripheral IL-15 levels thus triggered long-lasting effects beyond the treatment period.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6 Peripheral administration of the active form of IL-15 increases EAE severity

From disease onset and for 8 days, EAE mice were injected IP with either the IL-15/IL-15Rα complex or IL-15Rα alone (used as a control) and followed for clinical score over numerous days. A subset of mice (not included in the clinical scoring) were killed 9 or 14–15 days after treatment initiation for flow cytometry analysis of the CNS and spleen. (A) Clinical scores are shown as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test IL-15/IL-15Rα complex vs IL-15Rα alone day 8–26. * to ****p values: *p < 0.05 (days 8, 18, 19, and 22–26), **p < 0.01 (days 20 and 21), ***p < 0.001 (days 15–17), ****p < 0.0001 (days 9–14), n = 18–22 per group. (B) Number of splenocytes (upper graph) and percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes among splenocytes (lower graph) at day 9 (D9) and 15 (D15) posttreatment initiation. Unpaired t test D9-number of splenocytes IL-15/IL-15Rα complex vs IL-15Rα **p < 0.01. One-way ANOVA followed by the Fisher LSD post hoc test comparing percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes IL-15/IL-15Rα complex vs IL-15Rα **p < 0.01. (C) Percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes within CNS-infiltrating CD45hiCD11b− cells in each group, day 15 (upper graph). Relative number of CNS cells per mouse for each group, day 15 (lower graph). One-way ANOVA followed by the Fisher LSD post hoc test comparing IL-15/IL-15Rα complex vs IL-15Rα *p < 0.05. (D) Relative numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes within the CNS producing IFNγ, IL-17, GM-CSF, or granzyme B for each group, day 15. One-way ANOVA followed by the Fisher LSD post hoc test number of mediator-producing CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes IL-15/IL-15Rα complex vs IL-15Rα #p = 0.0686, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM n = 3–8 for (B and D). ANOVA = analysis of variance; EAE = experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; GM-CSF = granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; LSD = least significant difference; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.

To uncover the impact of IL-15 on immune cells, we performed flow cytometry analysis on spleen and CNS (pooled spinal cord and brain) cells. The number of splenocytes was significantly increased on day 9 (1 day after the last injection) in the IL-15/IL-15Rα–treated mice compared with controls, but came back to similar levels at day 15 (figure 6B). The proportion of CD8+ T lymphocytes within splenocytes was significantly greater in the IL-15/IL-15Rα compared with the control group at day 9 (figure 6B). Our results correlate with a previous report showing induced proliferation of CD8+ T lymphocytes on IP injection of the IL-15/IL-15Rα complex.24 We compared CNS-infiltrating T lymphocytes in both groups at day 15 posttreatment initiation, which was 1 week after the treatment regimen was stopped (figure 6C). We observed that the percentage within nonmyeloid CNS leukocytes and the relative number of CD4+ T lymphocytes per CNS were significantly increased in the IL-15/IL-15-Rα–treated group compared with the controls (figure 6C).

We evaluated the percentages of mediator-producing T lymphocytes in the spleen and CNS of EAE mice at day 15 posttreatment initiation. We observed that the percentage of splenic CD8+ T lymphocytes producing IFNγ was significantly increased in the IL-15/IL-15-Rα group compared with the controls, whereas the proportions of CD4+ T lymphocytes producing this cytokine were similar in both groups (figure e-3A, links.lww.com/NXI/A358). The percentages of splenic CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes producing IL-17, GM-CSF, or granzyme B were similar in both groups (figure e-3A). Among the CNS-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, the percentages of IFNγ, GM-CSF, or granzyme B were similar between both groups (figure e-3B). Furthermore, the percentage of IL-17–producing CD4+ T lymphocytes was elevated in the IL-15/IL-15-Rα group compared with the control group, without reaching significance. However, we observed a significantly higher number of CNS-infiltrating CD4+ T lymphocytes producing IL-17, GM-CSF, or granzyme B in IL-15/IL-15-Rα–treated mice compared with controls (figure 6D). The transitory increase of IL-15 levels (8 days) was sufficient to cause a long-term effect on EAE disease pathobiology (figure 6A) and an increased number of CNS-infiltrating inflammatory CD4+ T lymphocytes (figure 6D). Overall, our results highlight that a transient increase of peripheral IL-15 levels has a long-term impact on EAE pathobiology.

Discussion

Accumulating evidence supports a key role for IL-15 in chronic inflammatory diseases including MS.2,27,–,30 In the present study, we establish that IL-15 contributes to the amplification of inflammatory T-cell responses after disease onset in both patients with MS and EAE mice. We demonstrate that despite similar expression of the CD122/IL-15Rβ chain (figure 1), CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets from both patients with RRMS and PMS exhibit an enhanced response to IL-15, but not IL-2, compared with age/sex-matched HCs as documented by the STAT5p response (figure 2 and figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A356). IL-15 enhances more strongly the production of IL-17 by CD4+ T lymphocytes and the production of GM-CSF by CD8+ T lymphocytes from patients with MS compared with HCs (figures 3 and 4). Finally, we establish that a transient boost of peripheral IL-15 levels after symptom onset causes a sustained increase in EAE disease severity and an elevated number of IL-17, GM-CSF, or granzyme B–producing CD4+ T lymphocytes in the CNS (figure 6).

Our results demonstrate that expression of CD122 does not contribute to the altered responses of T lymphocytes from patients with MS (figure 1). Others reported an enhanced expression of IL-15R by CD4+ T cells from patients with RRMS and SPMS compared with HCs, but they did not specify which receptor chain was assessed.4 We observed similar or elevated proportions of CD25+ T lymphocytes in MS compared with HC (figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A356). This is in line with other reports showing either enhanced proportions of CD25+CD4+ and CD25+CD8+ effectors T lymphocytes in patients with RRMS or no change of CD25 expression in CD4+ T lymphocytes obtained from patients with RRMS and SPMS.31,32 We did not assess regulatory T lymphocytes among the CD25+CD4+ T lymphocyte population, which would require additional identifying markers (FoxP3+ CD127low). However, we do not believe that this population significantly contributes to the greater proportions of CD25+CD4+ T lymphocytes we observed in patients with PMS compared with HCs (figure e-1) since several groups demonstrated that patients with MS have an unaltered number of regulatory T cells compared with controls.33

We show that the IL-15–induced STAT5 signaling is enhanced in most T-cell subsets from both patients with RRMS and PMS compared with HCs (figure 2). Total unphosphorylated STAT5 and baseline pSTAT5 have been shown to be similar in T lymphocytes from MS and HC34; notably, we did not detect differences in baseline pSTAT5 between donor groups (data not shown). Therefore, we can rule out that elevated availability of STAT5 contributes to the enhanced STAT5p triggered by IL-15 in patients with MS. Notwithstanding upregulated CD25 expression in some MS T-cell subsets (figure e-1B, links.lww.com/NXI/A356), IL-2–induced pSTAT5 signaling was similar in all T-cell subsets from patients with MS and controls (figure e-1C). Thus, IL-15 and IL-2, despite their shared receptor chains, have distinct biological impacts.5 Notably, another cytokine using CD132 as a coreceptor, IL-7, triggered pSTAT5 in higher proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ memory T lymphocytes from patients with RRMS compared with controls.34 Moreover, increased pSTAT5 levels in autoreactive CD4+ T lymphocytes have been associated with a more aggressive disease course in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.35

The mechanisms contributing to the enhanced IL-15–triggered STAT5 phosphorylation we observed in T lymphocytes from patients with MS remain unknown. Signaling responses of T lymphocytes are shaped by the composition and abundance of lipid rafts.36 Notably, T lymphocytes from patients with autoimmune disease (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus) contain more cholesterol and GM1 (lipid raft maker) than cells from healthy donors.36 Moreover, higher expression of lipid rafts on murine CD8 T lymphocytes has been shown to correlate with greater responses to IL-2 and IL-15, including pSTAT5.37 Additional studies will be necessary to investigate whether the composition and abundance of lipid rafts in T lymphocytes of patients with MS is altered compared with HCs and how such alterations affect their responses to cytokines. Overall, these studies and our work underscore the potential central role of altered STAT5 signaling in response to multiple cytokines in T lymphocytes from patients with autoimmune diseases.

Several reports suggest that STAT5 contributes to T cell–mediated neuroinflammation. Mice carrying stat5-deficient CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes developed EAE with a lower incidence and disease severity due to impaired production of GM-CSF by autoreactive CD4+ T lymphocytes and reduced expansion of pathogenic Th17 cells.20 Moreover, the interplay between Th17 cells and IL-15 has been suggested in human inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis.17,38,–,40 IL-15 increased the percentage of IL-17–producing CD4+ T lymphocytes from patients with MS, but it had no impact on such production by T lymphocytes from HCs in our conditions (figure 4B). The boosting impact of IL-15 on the proportion of TNF or IFNγ-producing T lymphocytes was similar in MS and HC. Remarkably, IL-15's capacity to enhance GM-CSF production by T lymphocytes was more prominent in patients with PMS than in cells from HCs (figure 4C). Further studies will be necessary to delineate the relationship between the elevated STAT5 signaling and the upregulation of inflammatory cytokines by T lymphocytes in patients with MS.

Others have postulated that IL-15 is beneficial to EAE based on the aggravated disease in IL-15–deficient mice compared with wild-type controls.7,–,9 However, the immune system of IL-15–deficient mice exhibits multiple impairments such as reduced numbers of several immune cell subsets (e.g., natural killer cells and CD8 T lymphocytes),11,12 some of which are comprised of potential regulatory immune cell subsets. Therefore, the worse disease observed in IL-15–deficient mice could be due to multiple factors beyond the sole absence of IL-15. One group found that injection of IL-15 alone before EAE symptom onset tends to alleviate disease severity, albeit very modestly.10 This discrepancy with our results may be due to several methodological differences such as mouse strain (SJL/J), dose, and form of IL-15 (IL-15 alone). We recognize these differences; nevertheless, we believe that our experimental approach more closely models the human disease and provides solid evidence that IL-15 enhances the severity of the ongoing disease.

Collectively, our results point to the deleterious role of IL-15 in MS and its animal model EAE. Our in vivo data support IL-15 as an appealing therapeutic target given its impact after disease onset. Finally, the universality of the enhanced IL-15–triggered responses in T lymphocytes from all kinds of patients with MS (RRMS and PMS) underlines that this cytokine represents a common deleterious factor that could potentially be targeted in most patients with MS.

Study funding

This study was supported by an Operating Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, MOP-324604). N. Arbour has held a New Investigator Salary Award from the CIHR. C. Laurent obtained postdoctoral awards from Fondation d'Aide pour la Recherche sur la Sclérose en Plaques (ARSEP), Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS), and CIHR. M.-L. Clénet obtained studentships from the Neuroinflammation-CIHR training program and the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (MSSC). A. Carmena Moratalla obtained a joint studentship from the FRQS-MSSC. N. Farzam-kia obtained studentships from the Neuroinflammation-CIHR training program and FRQS. C. Larochelle holds a Chercheur-Boursier Junior 1 salary award from FRQS and A. Prat holds a Canadian Research Chair Tier I in Multiple Sclerosis.

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful for the excellent assistance of nurses Josée Poirier and Boaz Lahav. They thank the flow cytometry core facility of the CRCHUM. They are grateful to the members of the Arbour team (Florent Lemaitre and Yves Carpentier Solorio) for their comments on the article.

Appendix Authors

Table
Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

  • Received July 17, 2020.
  • Accepted in final form October 26, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Saikali P,
    2. Antel JP,
    3. Pittet CL,
    4. Newcombe J,
    5. Arbour N
    . Contribution of astrocyte-derived IL-15 to CD8 T cell effector functions in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol 2010;185:5693–5703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Schneider R,
    2. Mohebiany AN,
    3. Ifergan I, et al
    . B cell-derived IL-15 enhances CD8 T cell cytotoxicity and is increased in multiple sclerosis patients. J Immunol 2011;187:4119–4128.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Broux B,
    2. Mizee MR,
    3. Vanheusden M, et al
    . IL-15 amplifies the pathogenic properties of CD4+CD28- T cells in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol 2015;194:2099–2109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vaknin-Dembinsky A,
    2. Brass SD,
    3. Gandhi R,
    4. Weiner HL
    . Membrane bound IL-15 is increased on CD14 monocytes in early stages of MS. J Neuroimmunol 2008;195:135–139.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Leonard WJ,
    2. Lin JX,
    3. O'Shea JJ
    . The gammac family of cytokines: basic biology to therapeutic ramifications. Immunity 2019;50:832–850.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Richer MJ,
    2. Pewe LL,
    3. Hancox LS,
    4. Hartwig SM,
    5. Varga SM,
    6. Harty JT
    . Inflammatory IL-15 is required for optimal memory T cell responses. J Clin Invest 2015;125:3477–3490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yu P,
    2. Bamford RN,
    3. Waldmann TA
    . IL-15-dependent CD8+ CD122+ T cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by modulating IL-17 production by CD4+ T cells. Eur J Immunol 2014;44:3330–3341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Pandiyan P,
    2. Yang XP,
    3. Saravanamuthu SS, et al
    . The role of IL-15 in activating STAT5 and fine-tuning IL-17A production in CD4 T lymphocytes. J Immunol 2012;189:4237–4246.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gomez-Nicola D,
    2. Spagnolo A,
    3. Guaza C,
    4. Nieto-Sampedro M
    . Aggravated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in IL-15 knockout mice. Exp Neurol 2010;222:235–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. Pan W,
    3. He Y,
    4. Hsuchou H,
    5. Kastin AJ
    . Cerebral interleukin-15 shows upregulation and beneficial effects in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol 2010;223:65–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kennedy MK,
    2. Glaccum M,
    3. Brown SN, et al
    . Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J Exp Med 2000;191:771–780.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pagliari D,
    2. Cianci R,
    3. Frosali S, et al
    . The role of IL-15 in gastrointestinal diseases: a bridge between innate and adaptive immune response. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2013;24:455–466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Thompson AJ,
    2. Banwell BL,
    3. Barkhof F, et al
    . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kuijpers TW,
    2. van Leeuwen EM,
    3. Barendregt BH, et al
    . A reversion of an IL2RG mutation in combined immunodeficiency providing competitive advantage to the majority of CD8+ T cells. Haematologica 2013;98:1030–1038.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Clenet ML,
    2. Gagnon F,
    3. Moratalla AC,
    4. Viel EC,
    5. Arbour N
    . Peripheral human CD4(+)CD8(+) T lymphocytes exhibit a memory phenotype and enhanced responses to IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15. Sci Rep 2017;7:11612.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Legroux L,
    2. Arbour N
    . Multiple sclerosis and T lymphocytes: an entangled story. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2015;10:528–546.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ziolkowska M,
    2. Koc A,
    3. Luszczykiewicz G, et al
    . High levels of IL-17 in rheumatoid arthritis patients: IL-15 triggers in vitro IL-17 production via cyclosporin A-sensitive mechanism. J Immunol 2000;164:2832–2838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. McInnes IB,
    2. Leung BP,
    3. Sturrock RD,
    4. Field M,
    5. Liew FY
    . Interleukin-15 mediates T cell-dependent regulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Med 1997;3:189–195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Noster R,
    2. Riedel R,
    3. Mashreghi MF, et al
    . IL-17 and GM-CSF expression are antagonistically regulated by human T helper cells. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:241ra280.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sheng W,
    2. Yang F,
    3. Zhou Y, et al
    . STAT5 programs a distinct subset of GM-CSF-producing T helper cells that is essential for autoimmune neuroinflammation. Cell Res 2014;24:1387–1402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wagner CA,
    2. Roque PJ,
    3. Goverman JM
    . Pathogenic T cell cytokines in multiple sclerosis. J Exp Med 2020;217:e20190460.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bai Z,
    2. Chen D,
    3. Wang L, et al
    . Cerebrospinal fluid and blood cytokines as biomarkers for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 226 studies with 13,526 multiple sclerosis patients. Front Neurosci 2019;13:1026.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Elpek KG,
    2. Rubinstein MP,
    3. Bellemare-Pelletier A,
    4. Goldrath AW,
    5. Turley SJ
    . Mature natural killer cells with phenotypic and functional alterations accumulate upon sustained stimulation with IL-15/IL-15Ralpha complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:21647–21652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Stoklasek TA,
    2. Colpitts SL,
    3. Smilowitz HM,
    4. Lefrancois L
    . MHC class I and TCR avidity control the CD8 T cell response to IL-15/IL-15Ralpha complex. J Immunol 2010;185:6857–6865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Stoklasek TA,
    2. Schluns KS,
    3. Lefrancois L
    . Combined IL-15/IL-15Ralpha immunotherapy maximizes IL-15 activity in vivo. J Immunol 2006;177:6072–6080.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bergamaschi C,
    2. Bear J,
    3. Rosati M, et al
    . Circulating IL-15 exists as heterodimeric complex with soluble IL-15Ralpha in human and mouse serum. Blood 2012;120:e1–e8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bouchaud G,
    2. Gehrke S,
    3. Krieg C, et al
    . Epidermal IL-15Ralpha acts as an endogenous antagonist of psoriasiform inflammation in mouse and man. J Exp Med 2013;210:2105–2117.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Feigenbaum L,
    3. Awasthi P, et al
    . Insulin-dependent diabetes induced by pancreatic beta cell expression of IL-15 and IL-15Ralpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:13534–13539.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. McInnes IB,
    2. al-Mughales J,
    3. Field M, et al
    . The role of interleukin-15 in T-cell migration and activation in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Med 1996;2:175–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Vainer B,
    2. Nielsen OH,
    3. Hendel J,
    4. Horn T,
    5. Kirman I
    . Colonic expression and synthesis of interleukin 13 and interleukin 15 in inflammatory bowel disease. Cytokine 2000;12:1531–1536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Fransson M,
    2. Burman J,
    3. Lindqvist C,
    4. Atterby C,
    5. Fagius J,
    6. Loskog A
    . T regulatory cells lacking CD25 are increased in MS during relapse. Autoimmunity 2010;43:590–597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Venken K,
    2. Hellings N,
    3. Hensen K, et al
    . Secondary progressive in contrast to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients show a normal CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell function and FOXP3 expression. J Neurosci Res 2006;83:1432–1446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Noori-Zadeh A,
    2. Mesbah-Namin SA,
    3. Bistoon-Beigloo S, et al
    . Regulatory T cell number in multiple sclerosis patients: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016;5:73–76.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kreft KL,
    2. Verbraak E,
    3. Wierenga-Wolf AF, et al
    . The IL-7Ralpha pathway is quantitatively and functionally altered in CD8 T cells in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol 2012;188:1874–1883.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Goropevsek A,
    2. Gorenjak M,
    3. Gradisnik S, et al
    . STAT5 phosphorylation in CD4 T cells from patients with SLE is related to changes in their subsets and follow-up disease severity. J Leukoc Biol 2017;101:1405–1418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Varshney P,
    2. Yadav V,
    3. Saini N
    . Lipid rafts in immune signalling: current progress and future perspective. Immunology 2016;149:13–24.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Cho JH,
    2. Kim HO,
    3. Surh CD,
    4. Sprent J
    . T cell receptor-dependent regulation of lipid rafts controls naive CD8+ T cell homeostasis. Immunity 2010;32:214–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Elder JT
    . IL-15 and psoriasis: another genetic link to Th17? J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:2495–2497.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kuca-Warnawin E,
    2. Kurowska W,
    3. Prochorec-Sobieszek M, et al
    . Rheumatoid arthritis bone marrow environment supports Th17 response. Arthritis Res Ther 2017;19:274.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Chauhan SK,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Dana R
    . Interleukin-7 and -15 maintain pathogenic memory Th17 cells in autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 2017;77:96–103.
    OpenUrl

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Acknowledgment
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Patients With Tandem Lesion Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials

Dr. Nicole Sur and Dr. Mausaminben Hathidara

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Immunology
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Multiple sclerosis

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Article
    Dimethyl fumarate treatment alters circulating T helper cell subsets in multiple sclerosis
    Catharina C. Gross, Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Svenja Klinsing et al.
    Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation, December 10, 2015
  • Article
    Dimethyl fumarate suppresses granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor–producing Th1 cells in CNS neuroinflammation
    Farinaz Safavi, Rodolfo Thome, Zichen Li et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, May 05, 2020
  • Article
    Interleukin-26, preferentially produced by TH17 lymphocytes, regulates CNS barrier function
    Bieke Broux, Stephanie Zandee, Elizabeth Gowing et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, August 11, 2020
  • Article
    Transcriptome and Function of Novel Immunosuppressive Autoreactive Invariant Natural Killer T Cells That Are Absent in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
    Belinda Carrión, Yawei Liu, Mahdieh Hadi et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, August 12, 2021
Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation: 10 (4)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Online ISSN: 2332-7812

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise