Share

September 2021; 8 (5) ArticleOpen Access

Argonaute Autoantibodies as Biomarkers in Autoimmune Neurologic Diseases

Le-Duy Do, Christian P. Moritz, Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo, Anne-Laurie Pinto, Yannick Tholance, Sabine Brugiere, Yohann Couté, Oda Stoevesandt, Michael J. Taussig, Véronique Rogemond, Alberto Vogrig, Bastien Joubert, Karine Ferraud, Jean-Philippe Camdessanché, Jean-Christophe Antoine, Jérôme Honnorat
First published July 28, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001032
Full PDF
Citation
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1129

Share

Abstract

Objective To identify and characterize autoantibodies (Abs) as novel biomarkers for an autoimmune context in patients with central and peripheral neurologic diseases.

Methods Two distinct approaches (immunoprecipitation/mass spectrometry–based proteomics and protein microarrays) and patients' sera and CSF were used. The specificity of the identified target was confirmed by cell-based assay (CBA) in 856 control samples.

Results Using the 2 methods as well as sera and CSF of patients with central and peripheral neurologic involvement, we identified Abs against the family of Argonaute proteins (mainly AGO1 and AGO2), which were already reported in systemic autoimmunity. AGO-Abs were mostly of immunoglobulin G 1 subclass and conformation dependent. Using CBA, AGO-Abs were detected in 21 patients with a high suspicion of autoimmune neurologic diseases (71.4% were women; median age 57 years) and only in 4/856 (0.5%) controls analyzed by CBA (1 diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer and the other 3 with Sjögren syndrome). Among the 21 neurologic patients identified, the main clinical presentations were sensory neuronopathy (8/21, 38.1%) and limbic encephalitis (6/21, 28.6%). Fourteen patients (66.7%) had autoimmune comorbidities and/or co-occurring Abs, whereas AGO-Abs were the only autoimmune biomarker for the remaining 7/21 (33.3%). Thirteen (61.9%) patients were treated with immunotherapy; 8/13 (61.5%) improved, and 3/13 (23.1%) remained stable, suggesting an efficacy of these treatments.

Conclusions AGO-Abs might be potential biomarkers of autoimmunity in patients with central and peripheral nonparaneoplastic neurologic diseases. In 7 patients, AGO-Abs were the only biomarkers; thus, their identification may be useful to suspect the autoimmune character of the neurologic disorder.

Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that AGO-Abs are more frequent in patients with autoimmune neurologic diseases than controls.

Glossary

Ab=
autoantibody;
AE=
autoimmune encephalitis;
CBA=
cell-based assay;
IgG=
immunoglobulin G;
LE=
limbic encephalitis;
mRS=
modified Rankin Scale;
MS=
mass spectrometry;
PNS=
paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome;
SCLC=
small-cell lung cancer;
SNN=
sensory neuronopathy

The discovery of autoantibodies (Abs) against neuroglial antigens has revolutionized the diagnosis and understanding of autoimmune neurologic diseases and has led to the clinical description of different subtypes of autoimmune encephalitis (AE),1 paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS),2 and inflammatory peripheral neuropathies.3 On the one hand, some neuronal Abs can play a direct role in the pathophysiology, mainly when they are directed against surface antigens such as NMDA receptor,4 neurofascin 155,5 or contactin 1.6 On the other hand, some Abs are only indicative of an underlying cancer and can be useful to guide tumor screening in PNS,7 whereas others are biomarkers of autoimmunity, such as antibodies against fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in sensory neuronopathy (SNN).8,9 Nevertheless, there are still many patients and disorders clinically indistinguishable from well-characterized autoimmune neurologic diseases, but without reliable biomarkers. In these cases, it is always difficult to establish the autoimmune nature of the disease, which is only supported by occasional inflammatory abnormalities in the CSF.10,11 Hence, the discovery of new Abs is of major importance for the assertion of the autoimmune origin of these disorders and to propose an immunomodulator treatment that might lead to a better prognosis.12,13

In the present study, 2 different methods (immunoprecipitation coupled to mass spectrometry [MS]-based proteomics and protein microarrays) were used in parallel with the aim to identify novel Ab targets, leading to the discovery of antibodies against the Argonaute protein family (AGO-Abs), which have been already reported in systemic autoimmune disorders.

Methods

Two distinct approaches were used to identify the Abs and their antigens. In a first approach, we used the CSF of a patient with limbic encephalitis (LE; patient XI, see below), which showed an atypical staining on indirect immunofluorescence, to perform immunoprecipitation and MS-based analyses. In a simultaneous and independent approach, protein microarrays were used for Ab characterization in sera of patients with peripheral neuropathies. Finally, different sera and CSF samples of several patient cohorts were screened via cell-based assay (CBA) and the specificity of the identified target was confirmed by CBA and immunoadsorption; an assay to determine the binding region of the antigen was also performed. Detailed description of the methods is provided in the eMaterial (links.lww.com/NXI/A503).

Patient sera and CSFs were obtained from the NeuroBioTec biobanks (Hospices Civils de Lyon BRC, France, AC-2013-1867, NFS96-900; and CRB42 CHU Saint-Etienne, France, AC 2018-3372, NFS96-900). We selected for the study 250 CSF samples from patients with suspected AE/PNS and 42 sera of patients with peripheral neuropathies. As controls, we selected 312 CSF and 544 sera of various patients with or without neurologic involvement (Table 1). All samples were collected from October 2007 to December 2019.

View this table:
Table 1

Samples Tested for AGO Antibodies

Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents

The Institutional Review Board of the University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and Hospices Civils de Lyon and the CHU of Saint-Étienne approved the study (ANR-18-RHUS-0012), which has been carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Written consent was obtained from all patients.

Data Availability

Any data not published within the article are available and will be shared by request from any qualified investigator.

Results

Identification of Argonaute Proteins as Targets of Autoantibodies in Neurologic Diseases

Argonaute proteins were identified as targets of Abs using 2 different approaches. First, among a series of CSF from patients with suspected AE/PNS, one (from patient XI) showed an atypical immunostaining in the cytoplasm of neurons of the hippocampus (granular neurons of the dentate gyrus and CA1, CA3 pyramidal cells), cerebellum (granular cells, some cells in the molecular layer), and cerebral cortex (Figure 1A). Western blots using whole rat brain homogenates revealed with patient XI's CSF showed no signal (data not shown), suggesting that the antibodies were conformation dependent. Immunoprecipitation of whole rat brain homogenates with either patient XI or control CSF revealed the presence of patient XI-specific bands at 100 (Figure 1B, *) and 280 kDa (Figure 1B, **). Subsequent MS-based proteomic analyses identified AGO1, AGO2, AGO3, and AGO4 (theoretical MW∼100 kDa), as well as trinucleotide repeat containing 6A (TNRC6A), TNRC6B, and TNRC6C (theoretical MW∼200 kDa), as the most enriched proteins in patient XI's compared with control's immunoprecipitate.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Identification of AGO-Abs

(A) Immunostaining of the adult rat brain with CSF (1:10) of patient XI resulted in a strong reactivity with the stratum pyramidale of the hippocampus, granule cells of the cerebellum, and cerebral cortex. The scale bar is indicated for each magnification. (B) Immunoprecipitation of the antigens with patient XI's CSF. Note the specifically enriched band around 100 kDa (*) and the less intense band around 280 kDa (**) obtained after immunoprecipitation with patient XI's CSF (E+) compared with control CSF (E−). Protein bands were visualized via silver staining. (C) Quantified reactivities of 12 patients with SNN, 22 patients with ONPs, and 9 HCs with 7 AGO variants on protein microarrays. Red dots represent significantly positive samples (z-score > 4). AGO-Abs = antibodies against the Argonaute protein family; HC = healthy control; ONP = other peripheral neuropathy; SNN = sensory neuronopathy.

In parallel, the sera of 12 patients with SNN and of 34 controls were screened by protein microarrays, which revealed that AGO1 and AGO2 proteins were significantly targeted by 3 SNN patient sera; none of the control sera targeted any of the AGO proteins. A fourth SNN serum targeted AGO1, but not AGO2. Four and one of these patients with SNN significantly targeted AGO3 and AGO4 proteins, respectively, but with lower reactivities (Figure 1C).

Specificity of AGO-Abs

To validate the antigenic specificity of AGO-Abs, different CBAs were constructed, each with one of the AGO plasmids. Patient XI's CSF reacted with AGO1-4–transfected cells, whereas a control CSF showed no reactivity (Figure 2, lines 1–4), and no signal was observed with TNRC6 transfection (Figure 2, line 5) and nontransfected cells (line 6). Furthermore, after simultaneous AGO1- and AGO2-Ab depletion, the reactivity of patient XI's CSF in indirect immunofluorescence on rat brain sections was lost (eFigure 1, links.lww.com/NXI/A502), confirming that the atypical staining pattern previously observed was solely caused by antibodies targeting AGO proteins. In addition, 3 of 4 sera from patients with SNN that were positive by protein microarray specifically reacted with AGO1 and AGO2-HEK293–transfected cells (patients I, II, and III; data not shown).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Confirmation of AGO-Abs Using Cell-Based Assay

HEK293 cells were transfected with VP5-AGO1-4 or VP5-TNRC6B plasmid, for a transient overexpression. Fixed and permeabilized cells were then immunostained with anti-HA antibody (in green) and patient XI's CSF (1:10; in red). Only AGO-transfected cells (in green) reacted with patient XI's CSF. No reactivity was observed on TNRC6B-transfected cells or nontransfected cells. Scale bar = 50 μm. AGO-Abs = antibodies against the Argonaute protein family.

To validate the clinical specificity of AGO-Abs, a total of 856 control samples (312 CSF and 544 sera; Table 1) from patients with and without neurologic diseases (including 116 with systemic autoimmunity and no neurologic involvement and 50 from PNS with Hu-Abs and small-cell lung cancer [SCLC]) were screened by CBA. Among these controls, only 4 serum samples (4/544, 0.7%) and no CSF (0/312, 0.0%) were found positive for AGO-Abs. The 4 positive sera came from 1 patient with SCLC without neurologic symptoms and 3 patients with Sjögren syndrome.

To identify additional patients with AGO-Abs besides the index LE case and the 3 patients with SNN positive by CBA, the CSF of 250 patients with high suspicion of AE/PNS and the sera of 42 patients with peripheral neuropathies were screened by CBA. Among them, 12 (4.1%) new patients with AGO-Abs were identified; 8 of them had available CSF showing exactly the same aforementioned pattern by indirect immunofluorescence. In addition, 3,254 CSF sent to the reference center for suspicion of AE/PNS were prospectively screened for an AGO-Abs immunostaining pattern (between August 28, 2019 and February 25, 2020), and 5 (0.1%) new AGO-Abs cases were identified.

Clinical and Paraclinical Characteristics of AGO-Ab Neurologic Patients

A total of 21 patients with AGO-Abs and neurologic symptoms were identified, their median age was 57 years (range 25–85 years), and 15/21 (71.4%) were women (Table 2). The most common clinical presentation was SNN (8/21, 38.1%), followed by LE (6/21, 28.6%), cerebellar syndrome (2/21, 9.5%), other peripheral neuropathies (2/21, 9.5%), rhombencephalitis (1/21, 4.8%), and opsoclonus-myoclonus (1/21, 4.8%). One patient (1/21, 4.8%) presented with a transitory low level of consciousness that was not described in detail in the charts. The CSF was inflammatory (pleocytosis ≥ 5 cells) in 8/16 (50.0%) patients; oligoclonal bands were positive in 4/9 (44.4%) patients. All but one of the patients with CNS involvement had an abnormal MRI (Figure 3). Cancer was diagnosed in only 5/21 (23.8%) patients. Autoimmune comorbidities (Sjögren syndrome in 7/21 patients, 33.3%) and/or co-occurring Abs (mainly anti–Sjögren syndrome-related antigen A, detected in 8/21 patients, 38.1%) were present in 14/21 (66.7%) patients, whereas in the remaining 7 patients (7/21, 33.3%), AGO-Abs were the sole biomarker of autoimmunity. A total of 14/21 (66.7%) patients received immunotherapy, including steroids (n = 11), IV immunoglobulin (n = 9), cyclophosphamide (n = 3), rituximab (n = 3), plasma exchanges (n = 2), azathioprine (n = 2), and/or methotrexate (n = 2). The median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at onset was 3 (range 2–5) for the 19 patients with available information, the median mRS score at last follow-up for 16 patients was 2.5 (range 0–6), and follow-up was not available for 5 patients. Among the patients treated with immunotherapy for whom enough follow-up data were available (n = 13), 8/13 (61.5%) improved (lower mRS score at last follow-up compared with the one at clinical onset), 3/13 (23.1%) remained stable (unchanged mRS score), and for 2/13 (15.4%), their condition worsened. In total, 2 (2/21, 9.5%) patients died: patient XIV, due to progression of the SCLC, and patient XVI, because of several complications of hepatic cirrhosis of alcohol origin.

View this table:
Table 2

Clinical Characteristics of Patients With AGO Antibodies

Figure 3
Figure 3 Neuroimaging Findings in 2 Patients With AGO2-Abs

(A) Axial (top) and coronal (bottom) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) brain MRI of patient XII with limbic encephalitis, showing bilateral swelling and hyperintensity of medial temporal lobes, extending also to a lesser degree to the lateral temporal cortex. (B) Axial FLAIR (top) brain MRI of patient XVII presenting with cerebellar ataxia, showing vermis atrophy and left cerebellar hemisphere hyperintensity. Pancerebellar atrophy is better demonstrated on the sagittal T2 brain MRI (bottom) of the same patient.

Characteristics of AGO-Abs

Among all the samples tested herein so far, the ones that were positive for AGO-Abs reacted on CBA more strongly for AGO1 and AGO2 compared with AGO3 and AGO4. The median serum titer of AGO-Abs was 40,000 (range [200–2,560,000]) and was higher than the median CSF titers (400; range [10–512,000]). The median AGO1- and AGO2-Ab CSF and serum titers were higher than the median AGO3- and AGO4-Ab titers (data not shown). These results, together with those from the protein microarrays and the AGO1/AGO2 immunoadsorption, indicate that the antibodies in the studied patients targeted mainly AGO1 and AGO2 rather than AGO3 and AGO4. AGO1/2-Abs in the CSF were predominantly of immunoglobulin G (IgG)1 subclass in the 8 patients analyzed, although other subclasses were also present in 4 patients; in the sera, IgG1 was also the main subclass in 11/12 patients (the remaining one being exclusively IgG3), but other subclasses co-occurred in 6 patients.

It was not possible to identify the binding region of the AGO-Abs by CBA with the 4 different subdomains of AGO, as transfection with any of the truncated mutants abrogated reactivity, while the full-length AGO-positive control was reactive (data not shown).

Discussion

Using 2 complementary methods, we identified AGO proteins as the target of Abs in patients having autoimmune neurologic diseases of the peripheral and CNS, therefore suggesting that AGO-Abs might be potential biomarkers of autoimmunity.

AGO proteins constitute a highly conserved subfamily of 4 RNA-binding proteins (AGO 1–4) that plays a major role in RNA silencing pathways, repressing translation through the interaction with microRNAs and short interfering RNAs.14 AGO proteins are present in cytoplasmic structures known as glycine/tryptophan (GW-) or processing (P-) bodies, which are involved in mRNA degradation and also include other components such as the TNRC6 proteins.14,15 Of interest, several proteins implicated in RNA metabolism have been described as antigens of Abs detected in autoimmune systemic diseases, such as Sm or Ro proteins,16 and even in patients with PNS because Hu and Ri antigens are RNA-binding proteins as well.17,18 AGO-Abs, initially labeled as Su-Abs, were reported in the serum of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, Sjögren syndrome, and other rheumatologic autoimmune diseases.19,-,21 The Su antigen was later identified by immunoprecipitation as the 100-kDa RNA-binding protein AGO2 and localized in the cytoplasmic GW/P-bodies.22,23 More recent studies expanded the clinical associations of AGO-Abs to primary antiphospholipid syndrome and inflammatory myopathies,24,25 reinforcing the link between AGO-Abs and systemic autoimmunity.

We report herein a series describing in detail the presence of AGO-Abs in patients with neurologic diseases. In a study investigating the clinical correlation of antibodies against several antigens of the GW/P-bodies, 2 of 6 patients with serum AGO-Abs had peripheral neuropathies and 1 patient with Sjögren syndrome had a nonspecified ataxia.26 Nevertheless, only serum was analyzed, and no precise clinical descriptions were provided. In the present series, SNN and LE were the 2 most common clinical phenotypes, representing two-thirds of the cases, and of interest, Sjögren syndrome co-occurred more frequently in patients with SNN than in LE cases. AGO-Abs were also present in patients with other neurologic presentations (cerebellar syndrome, opsoclonus-myoclonus, and length-dependent polyneuropathies), resembling the varied clinical associations observed in patients with PNS and antibodies against intracellular neural antigens such as Hu.2 The presence of inflammatory CSF abnormalities and the frequent co-occurrence of other Abs or autoimmune diseases also support the autoimmune nature of the neurologic conditions associated herein with AGO-Abs. Besides, the fact that 3 of 4 positive controls were patients with Sjögren syndrome also supports the value of AGO-Abs as biomarkers of autoimmunity. Conversely, AGO-Abs seem not to be a paraneoplastic biomarker because only 5 of 21 patients had a cancer; moreover, there was a clear temporal relationship between the tumor and the neurologic disorder in only 3 of them, and in 1 case, AGO-Abs co-occurred with GABABR-Abs already described to be strongly associated with SCLC. Moreover, no AGO-Abs were identified in a cohort of well-defined PNS with SCLC and Hu-Abs.

The initial identification of the target of AGO-Abs led to the observation of 2 immunoprecipitated bands, a 100-kDa band attributed to AGO and a 250-kDa band.20,23 Likewise, we observed herein the same result and identified the 280-kDa band as TNRC6 proteins, whereas it was previously suggested to be the double-stranded RNA-specific endonuclease Dicer,23 which is necessary to form the small RNAs bound to AGO proteins.14 Furthermore, by developing a specific CBA, we showed that the Abs from the patients of the current series targeted only AGO proteins and not TNRC6. Moreover, AGO-Abs seem to be conformation specific21 because Western blots did not show any signal and CBA was only reactive when the full-length AGO was transfected. Although, as previously reported,23 AGO-Abs reacted against the 4 AGO proteins; AGO1 and AGO2 were the main targets based on the antibody titration, protein microarrays, and immunoadsorption results. This shared reactivity has been linked to the high homology among the 4 AGO proteins (reaching up to 80%), although an epitope spreading phenomenon might also explain this finding.23

To date, there are no available data on the potential effect of AGO-Abs on the pathogenesis of rheumatologic diseases.21 Of interest, AGO-Abs have also been described in association with hepatitis C virus,27 which has been shown to interact with AGO2 and inhibit RNA silencing processes.28 It has been proposed that AGO2 could be modified through its binding to viral proteins leading to a loss of self-tolerance and AGO-Ab production.21 In terms of pathogenic relevance in autoimmune neurologic diseases, it is unlikely that AGO-Abs play a major role, as is the case for other Abs against intracellular neural antigens.29

Overall, AGO-Ab prevalence among systemic autoimmune diseases is 10%–20% compared with less than 1% in an unselected population.30 Thus, though not tightly associated with a single disorder, AGO-Abs appear as reliable biomarkers of autoimmunity. Likewise, our results revealed only 1 sample of the 856 screened controls being positive without evidence of neurologic or systemic autoimmune disease. Nevertheless, AGO-Abs were not frequently found in the retrospective cohort of high suspicion of AE/PNS and inflammatory neuropathies or in the prospective sample. In addition, a considerable subset of neurologic patients with AGO-Abs described herein also presented well-characterized Abs or co-occurring autoimmune diseases; thus, the diagnostic value of AGO-Abs seems restricted to selected cases.

In conclusion, we report herein AGO-Abs as potential biomarkers of autoimmunity in neurologic diseases, especially in patients with associated systemic diseases. In few patients, AGO-Abs might be the only biomarkers of the autoimmune origin of the neurologic syndrome.

Study Funding

This work has been developed within the BETPSY project, which is supported by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR), as part of the second “Investissements d'Avenir” program (reference ANR-18-RHUS-0012) and by ANR-10-INBS-08-01 ProFi and FRM (Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale) DQ20170336751. Proteomic experiments were partly supported by the ProFI grant (ANR-10-INBS-08-01). C.P. Moritz was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, MO 3240/1-1:1).

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank NeuroBioTec Hospices Civils de Lyon BRC (France, AC-2013-1867, NFS96-900) for banking sera and CSF samples. They thank Professor Gunter Meister and Pascal Leblanc for sending them plasmids coding for AGOs and TNRC6s proteins and Evelyne Reynaud-Federspiel for technical assistance. They also thank Hélène Boyer for help in manuscript preparation (Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France). They express their grateful thanks to Drs. Giovanni Castelnovo (CHU Nîmes, France), Olivier Flabeau (CH de la Côte Basque, France), Antoine Pegat (CHU Lyon, France), Charles Behr (CHRU Strasbourg, France), Elisa Kaphan (CHU La Timone, France), Adrien Didelot (CH Saint Joseph-Saint Luc, France), Daniela Andriuta (CHU Amiens, France), Sébastien Boulogne (CHU Lyon, France), Leo Partouche (CHU Montpellier, France), Martial Mallaret (CHU Grenoble), Philip Evon (CH Bar-Le-Duc, France), Laurent Magy (CHU Limoges, France), François Oschner (CHUV Lausanne, Switzerland), Stéphane Paul (CHU Saint-Étienne, France), Guillaume Taieb (CHU Montpellier, France), Marcondes França (University of Campinas, Brazil), who sent them CSF and serum samples and clinical data for the study, as well as Dr. Stephane Paul (Laboratory of Immunology) and Dr. Killian Martin (Department of Internal Medicine), from University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, for sending sera from patients with Sjögren syndrome without neurologic disorder. Some authors are members of the ERN Euro-NMD.

Appendix Authors

Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • ↵* These authors contributed equally to this work as co–first authors.

  • ↵‡ These authors contributed equally to this work as co–senior authors.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by PIA/ANR.

  • Received January 5, 2021.
  • Accepted in final form April 26, 2021.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dalmau J,
    2. Geis C,
    3. Graus F
    . Autoantibodies to synaptic receptors and neuronal cell surface proteins in autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. Physiol Rev. 2017;97(2):839-887.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Graus F
    . Recommended diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(8):1135-1140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Querol L,
    2. Devaux J,
    3. Rojas-Garcia R,
    4. Illa I
    . Autoantibodies in chronic inflammatory neuropathies: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(9):533-547.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dalmau J,
    2. Gleichman AJ,
    3. Hughes EG, et al
    . Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(12):1091-1098.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Manso C,
    2. Querol L,
    3. Lleixà C, et al
    . Anti-Neurofascin-155 IgG4 antibodies prevent paranodal complex formation in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(6):2222-2236.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Manso C,
    2. Querol L,
    3. Mekaouche M,
    4. Illa I,
    5. Devaux JJ
    . Contactin-1 IgG4 antibodies cause paranode dismantling and conduction defects. Brain. 2016;139(pt 6):1700-1712.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Titulaer MJ,
    2. Soffietti R,
    3. Dalmau J, et al
    . Screening for tumours in paraneoplastic syndromes: report of an EFNS Task Force: screening for tumours in PNS. Eur J Neurol. 2011(1);18:19-e3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Antoine J-C,
    2. Boutahar N,
    3. Lassablière F, et al
    . Antifibroblast growth factor receptor 3 antibodies identify a subgroup of patients with sensory neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(12):1347-1355.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tholance Y,
    2. Moritz CP,
    3. Rosier C, et al
    . Clinical characterisation of sensory neuropathy with anti-FGFR3 autoantibodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(1):49-57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ducray F,
    2. Demarquay G,
    3. Graus F, et al
    . Seronegative paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration: the PNS Euronetwork experience. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(5):731-735.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Graus F,
    2. Escudero D,
    3. Oleaga L, et al
    . Syndrome and outcome of antibody-negative limbic encephalitis. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(8):1011-1016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Graus F,
    2. Titulaer MJ,
    3. Balu R, et al
    . A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(14):391-404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Viaccoz A,
    2. Honnorat J
    . Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: general treatment overview. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2013;15(2):150-168.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Peters L,
    2. Meister G
    . Argonaute proteins: mediators of RNA silencing. Mol Cell. 2007;26(5):611-623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Meister G,
    2. Landthaler M,
    3. Peters L, et al
    . Identification of novel argonaute-associated proteins. Curr Biol. 2005;15(23):2149-2155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Pruijn GJ
    . The RNA interference pathway: a new target for autoimmunity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(4):110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Szabo A,
    2. Dalmau J,
    3. Manley G, et al
    . HuD, a paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis antigen, contains RNA-binding domains and is homologous to Elav and Sex-lethal. Cell. 1991;67(2):325-333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Buckanovich RJ,
    2. Posner JB,
    3. Darnell RB
    . Nova, the paraneoplastic Ri antigen, is homologous to an RNA-binding protein and is specifically expressed in the developing motor system. Neuron. 1993;11(4):657-672.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Treadwell EL,
    2. Alspaugh MA,
    3. Sharp GC
    . Characterization of a new antigen-antibody system (Su) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(11):1263-1271.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Satoh M,
    2. Langdon JJ,
    3. Chou CH, et al
    . Characterization of the Su antigen, a macromolecular complex of 100/102 and 200-kDa proteins recognized by autoantibodies in systemic rheumatic diseases. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994;73(1):132-141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Satoh M,
    2. Chan JYF,
    3. Ceribelli A,
    4. Vazquez del-Mercado M,
    5. Chan EKL
    . Autoantibodies to argonaute 2 (Su antigen). Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;768:45-59.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jakymiw A,
    2. Lian S,
    3. Eystathioy T, et al
    . Disruption of GW bodies impairs mammalian RNA interference. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7(12):1267-1274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Jakymiw A,
    2. Ikeda K,
    3. Fritzler MJ,
    4. Reeves WH,
    5. Satoh M,
    6. Chan EKL
    . Autoimmune targeting of key components of RNA interference. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(4):R87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ceribelli A,
    2. Tincani A,
    3. Cavazzana I, et al
    . Anti-argonaute2 (Ago2/Su) and -Ro antibodies identified by immunoprecipitation in primary anti-phospholipid syndrome (PAPS). Autoimmunity. 2011;44(2):90-97.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ogawa-Momohara M,
    2. Muro Y,
    3. Satoh M,
    4. Akiyama M
    . Autoantibodies to Su/Argonaute 2 in Japanese patients with inflammatory myopathy. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;471:304-307.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bhanji RA,
    2. Eystathioy T,
    3. Chan EKL,
    4. Bloch DB,
    5. Fritzler MJ
    . Clinical and serological features of patients with autoantibodies to GW/P bodies. Clin Immunol. 2007;125(3):247-256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Vázquez-Del Mercado M,
    2. Sánchez-Orozco LV,
    3. Pauley BA, et al
    . Autoantibodies to a miRNA-binding protein Argonaute2 (Su antigen) in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(6):842-848.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ji J,
    2. Glaser A,
    3. Wernli M,
    4. Berke JM,
    5. Moradpour D,
    6. Erb P
    . Suppression of short interfering RNA-mediated gene silencing by the structural proteins of hepatitis C virus. J Gen Virol. 2008;89(pt 11):2761-2766.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Graus F,
    2. Dalmau J
    . Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes in the era of immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(9):535-548.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Satoh M,
    2. Chan EKL,
    3. Ho LA, et al
    . Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of antinuclear antibodies in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(7):2319-2327.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.
    1. Camdessanche J-P,
    2. Jousserand G,
    3. Ferraud K, et al
    . The pattern and diagnostic criteria of sensory neuronopathy: a case-control study. Brain. 2009;132(pt 7):1723-1733.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

Alert Me

Recommended articles